Yes, it was illegal because his intent was to hinder an investigation.FredH » 02 Aug 2023, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑ So somehow deleting security footage in his own home is against the law? You are one dumb son of a bitch. You can't see how easily all these charges are seen through? The ONLY chance any of this has to work against Trump is if you have a corrupt leftist judge. Lucky you.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023 ... ns-tenure/
https://twitchy.com/dougp/2023/08/02/su ... n-n2385912
Do orders come in the form of a question? when does social order match natural order? Random details or specific results equally timed apart in this evolving process going on now?Bruce » 02 Aug 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, it was illegal because his intent was to hinder an investigation.
If you are served notice the police want your video you cannot order it destroyed.
how bout a cell phone? Can someone smash them if they have been Supened?Bruce » 02 Aug 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, it was illegal because his intent was to hinder an investigation.
If you are served notice the police want your video you cannot order it destroyed.
That was not the truth for Hillary was it? Can you prove his intent? So that a jury would believe what was in his mind? Were he and Melania having sex in the hall? Was he served notice? Got a legitimate link?Bruce » 02 Aug 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, it was illegal because his intent was to hinder an investigation.
If you are served notice the police want your video you cannot order it destroyed.
What is a brain and where did it come from? Genetic compounding as ancestrally displacedFredH » 03 Aug 2023, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑ That was not the truth for Hillary was it? Can you prove his intent? So that a jury would believe what was in his mind? Were he and Melania having sex in the hall? Was he served notice? Got a legitimate link?