Powell admitted no such thing ....
Majik » 03 Aug 2023, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Powell admitted no such thing ....
and even if she did .....explain how she could know something that was never investigated formally to be a lie?
and what do you mean "why should they"?
are you saying the federal government should not have to prove that the election was not rigged ?
his actions were reasonable considering the circumstances .....Bruce » 03 Aug 2023, 6:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Wait.
That’s the Fox News fairy tale.
Trump is not being charged with incitement.
He’s being charged with actions he took before Jan 6.
He conspired with six others to peacefully overturn an election.
Yeah, that is quite apparent....
funny you believed her when she said they were rigged, you did not ask that thenMajik » 03 Aug 2023, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Powell admitted no such thing ....
and even if she did .....explain how she could know something that was never investigated formally to be a lie?
and what do you mean "why should they"?
are you saying the federal government should not have to prove that the election was not rigged ?
he had months of asking courts to investigate it, and for officials to recount ballots yada yada yada ... he lost everywhere.Majik » 03 Aug 2023, 8:06 pm » wrote: ↑ his actions were reasonable considering the circumstances .....
and he did not try and overturn anything he wanted it investigated just like most reasonable people did ....
I knew the election was rigged the morning after..... way before powell made her first public statement ......jerrab » 03 Aug 2023, 8:14 pm » wrote: ↑ funny you believed her when she said they were rigged, you did not ask that then
No, what Trump did was ignore the pleas of all his family and his inner circle to step down, and instead pursued a conspiracy to have seven state Republican Party meetings of fake electors. They then tried to get Mike Pence to count the fake votes instead of real votes.Majik » 03 Aug 2023, 8:06 pm » wrote: ↑ his actions were reasonable considering the circumstances .....
and he did not try and overturn anything he wanted it investigated just like most reasonable people did ....
J Turley is very well versed when it comes to constitutional law and is one of the highest regarded experts...and the irony here is he's a democrat and never voted for Trump...
Bruce » 03 Aug 2023, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ The realty is this is the most important criminal case in all the history of the world.
A United States President tried as hard as he could to steal a constitutional election.
He even tried stealing 5 electoral votes from solid blue New Mexico,
He’s going to go to prison if he doesn’t take a deal,
yeah but, he didn't go to the Demonrat Law School!ROG62 » 03 Aug 2023, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑ J Turley is very well versed when it comes to constitutional law and is one of the highest regarded experts...and the irony here is he's a democrat and never voted for Trump...
WITH THE FIRST AMENDMENT?Bruce » 03 Aug 2023, 6:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Wait.
That’s the Fox News fairy tale.
Trump is not being charged with incitement.
He’s being charged with actions he took before Jan 6.
He conspired with six others to peacefully overturn an election.
AMAZING HOW THEY ATTEMPT TO TURN INNOCENCE INTO A CRIME IN FRONT OF A LEFTIST JURY
righteous » 03 Aug 2023, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑ AMAZING HOW THEY ATTEMPT TO TURN INNOCENCE INTO A CRIME IN FRONT OF A LEFTIST JURY
WHAT A GREAT JUDICIAL SYSTEM WE HAVE.
BANANA REPUBLIC
COMMUNIST CONTROL
It's why he's good...