Liberal Forum

razoo » 05 Aug 2023, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2023, 3:01 pm

Phasing out coal and nuke and cut way back on Natural Gas

 Put These Five major renewable energy sources as the priority:

• Solar energy from the sun.
• Geothermal energy from heat inside the earth.
• Wind energy.
• Biomass from plants.
• Hydropower from flowing water.

https://www.eia.gov › energyexplained › sources-of-ener...

Do you volunteer to go to China and India and convince them too to agree to such stupidity that would destroy their economies?
Or is it simply that you can't find anyone in those countries who are as gullible as you?
 

jack » 05 Aug 2023, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2023, 4:14 pm

For all I know online there aren't any with reviews attached. What of it? We both know the science is out there,  been accumulating for years, accepted by every or almost every science academy in the world. So, not playing the game.

Enjoy the limb, and your dick.

So tell us, genius.  
Which of them have admitted that NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THEIR DOOM AND GLOOM PREDICTIONS OVER THE LAST 50 YEARS HAS COME TRUE?

Why do you insist on doubling down on such gullible stupidity when you can't even explain why a single one of them has not come to pass?
 

NA

Zeets2 » 05 Aug 2023, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2023, 5:22 pm

So tell us, genius.  
Which of them have admitted that NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THEIR DOOM AND GLOOM PREDICTIONS OVER THE LAST 50 YEARS HAS COME TRUE?

Why do you insist on doubling down on such gullible stupidity when you can't even explain why a single one of them has not come to pass?

The gullibility is people lucky if they made it through high school chemistry presuming to debate climate change. Grow up and forget it.

jack » 05 Aug 2023, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2023, 5:44 pm

The gullibility is people lucky if they made it through high school chemistry presuming to debate climate change. Grow up and forget it.

So, then it should be very simple to answer my question, and yet you avoid it like the plague!

Here, let me give you ANOTHER chance, which I guarantee you will ALSO immediately ignore:
Which of them have admitted that NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THEIR DOOM AND GLOOM PREDICTIONS OVER THE LAST 50 YEARS HAS COME TRUE?
 

Beekeeper » 04 Aug 2023, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2023, 7:11 am

What gets me is that these "science writers" inject the MOST HYPERBOLIC claims in their writing and NONE OF IT is backed up by the actual SCIENCE.

MODELS are not reality, but PROJECTIONS and TO DATE, none of them have been accurate OR ANYWHERE CLOSE to reality.

But these LWNJs fully believe EVERY WORD THEY WRITE, no matter HOW MUCH YOU PROVE THEM DEAD *** WRONG!!

An interesting part of this is that they push "projections" as truth and believable info.

Yet they damn writers for recounting the past which is ACTUAL data
showing cycles that continue right up to yesterday.

A case in point:
"Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 years."

Lefties hate this heavily cited book. No projections, just a look back at what happened.  
 
 

razoo » 05 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm

THAT is why 5 are suggested  ............. all of them are in place here and there as we speak ............. 

Radioactive waste sucks and can live thousands of years all RadioActive fly ash from coal ie quite dangerous ......... so we keep HYDRO POWER plus 4 other sources.

And ALL 4 COMBINED are unable to produce a RELIABLE electricity source COMBINED with the ONE HYDRO exception, assuming the LAKE behind the DAM doesn't get so low it can't generate, which HAS happened.

Coal and Nat Gas, are 100% reliable and will be for CENTURIES TO COME, ****!!

Yet, NONE of your **** sources are capable of generating MORE than 25% of PROMISED output!!

Zeets2 » 05 Aug 2023, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2023, 5:50 pm

So, then it should be very simple to answer my question, and yet you avoid it like the plague!

Here, let me give you ANOTHER chance, which I guarantee you will ALSO immediately ignore:
Which of them have admitted that NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THEIR DOOM AND GLOOM PREDICTIONS OVER THE LAST 50 YEARS HAS COME TRUE?

You're not a plague, just another dummy on the Right who doesn't get things the first time.

jack » 05 Aug 2023, 7:48 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2023, 7:48 pm

You're not a plague, just another dummy on the Right who doesn't get things the first time.

So you can't produce a SINGLE PREDICTION that has actually occurred AS PREDICTED from your so called "climate scientists" or their handlers.

After 50+ years of FAILED PREDICTIONS, then one would imagine you would be "smart" enough to realize that they are nothing more than FALSE PROPHETS and PSEUDO-SCIENTISTS without any real science produced. BUT, you still believe the sack of **** in SPITE of the failures of ALL of your "globull warmers".
 

jack » 05 Aug 2023, 7:48 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2023, 7:48 pm

You're not a plague, just another dummy on the Right who doesn't get things the first time.

So you basically admit that EVERY CLIMATE CHANGE PREDICTION IN THE PAST 50 YEARS HAS BEEN WRONG, and yet you're still dumb enough to try to claim that I'M the one who "doesn't get things the first time", huh?

Tell me, fool.  How many failures DOES it take to get through that thick gullible head of yours?
 

Zeets2 » 06 Aug 2023, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 7:15 am

So you basically admit that EVERY CLIMATE CHANGE PREDICTION IN THE PAST 50 YEARS HAS BEEN WRONG, and yet you're still dumb enough to try to claim that I'M the one who "doesn't get things the first time", huh?

Tell me, fool.  How many failures DOES it take to get through that thick gullible head of yours?

"basically admit": he didn't say what I wanted to hear so I'll say it for him. The Asshole's Dictionary.

 

Beekeeper » 04 Aug 2023, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2023, 7:11 am

What gets me is that these "science writers" inject the MOST HYPERBOLIC claims in their writing and NONE OF IT is backed up by the actual SCIENCE.

MODELS are not reality, but PROJECTIONS and TO DATE, none of them have been accurate OR ANYWHERE CLOSE to reality.

But these LWNJs fully believe EVERY WORD THEY WRITE, no matter HOW MUCH YOU PROVE THEM DEAD *** WRONG!!

I was going to start a thread on this OMG video so it wouldn't get buried but I didn't want to step on yer thread so here it is...

https://okeefemediagroup.com/the-climat ... en-camera/
 
 

jack » 06 Aug 2023, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 8:59 am

"basically admit": he didn't say what I wanted to hear so I'll say it for him. The Asshole's Dictionary.

Well, when you continue to deny FACTS like the 50 year history of wrongful predictions that have come from the left, and you refuse to respond to a very simple question repeatedly, there's no other conclusion that could possibly be drawn.

Want another shot at it?  No problem!:
EVERY CLIMATE CHANGE PREDICTION IN THE PAST 50 YEARS HAS BEEN WRONG
True or False?
Do you need the list of wrong predictions?
  
Or will you run away from that fact as you did twice before?

And when you're incapable of answering it honestly once again, then yes, you're "basically admitting" that statement is 100% true!


 

Zeets2 » 06 Aug 2023, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 9:09 am

Well, when you continue to deny FACTS like the 50 year history of wrongful predictions that have come from the left, and you refuse to respond to a very simple question repeatedly, there's no other conclusion that could possibly be drawn.

Want another shot at it?  No problem!:
EVERY CLIMATE CHANGE PREDICTION IN THE PAST 50 YEARS HAS BEEN WRONG
True or False?
Do you need the list of wrong predictions?
  
Or will you run away from that fact as you did twice before?

And when you're incapable of answering it honestly once again, then yes, you're "basically admitting" that statement is 100% true!

Leftists don't want the truth to get in the way of the lies they consume. 

jack » 05 Aug 2023, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2023, 9:35 am

Right wingers are anti-common language.

They sate themselves on insult lingo. They sate themselves on ideological group-think that goes with their dumbed down language.

Actual science is not available to them. They haven't the interest or the discipline to go near it, being sated on what is group-fed to them.

Accordingly, most haven't a clue how to find it, couldn't find it if they tried, and would fear to learn it if it came to them.

EXACTLY = they demonstrate your points daily

roadkill » 06 Aug 2023, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 9:15 am

Leftists don't want the truth to get in the way of the lies they consume.

You know, that's what amazes me the most!

Libs like him are never concerned about how dumb they look when they can't respond honestly to those same simple questions.  And the entire DNC party and the leftist media are all too happy to watch them expose their ignorance because they know how malleable puppets like him are!
 

Zeets2 » 06 Aug 2023, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 9:21 am

You know, that's what amazes me the most!

Libs like him are never concerned about how dumb they look when they can't respond honestly to those same simple questions.  And the entire DNC party and the leftist media are all too happy to watch them expose their ignorance because they know how malleable puppets like him are!

It's funny watching videos where leftists make certain accusations about things like racism and when someone asks them for some evidence/facts on their claims they either can't cite anything or they say "I have to go now" and they walk away.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJe6-afGz0Q
 
 
 

razoo » 06 Aug 2023, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 9:20 am

EXACTLY = they demonstrate your points daily

If all that were true, it ought to be a simple thing for you idiots to prove how those dozens of ridiculous "predictions" have come to pass!

So why can't you answer to the fact that you STILL believe in the hoax DESPITE the evidence of all those phony predictions failing to be accurate?

Want to try again for the gold ring?
Great!  This should be an easy one for any who believe in the hoax. 
Explain these photos for us, will you?:

  
 
Why are those such tough questions?  
How is it that we see your tail lights running away from such simple questions you can't answer every time you're faced with them at breakneck speed?

razoo » 06 Aug 2023, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 9:20 am

EXACTLY = they demonstrate your points daily

Hate to tell you ****, your only "thought" is what you PARROT from the PROPAGANDA your handlers have BLOWN UP THAT NASTY FILTHY NAZI *** of yours.

Totally complete with ZERO FACTS in their agitprop.

What Is Global Warming?

Global warming is the long-term heating of Earth’s surface observed since the pre-industrial period (between 1850 and 1900) due to human activities, primarily fossil fuel burning, which increases heat-trapping greenhouse gas levels in Earth’s atmosphere.


This term is not interchangeable with the term "climate change."


Since the pre-industrial period, human activities are estimated to have increased Earth’s global average temperature by about 1 degree Celsius (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit), a number that is currently increasing by more than 0.2 degrees Celsius (0.36 degrees Fahrenheit) per decade.


The current warming trend is unequivocally the result of human activity since the 1950s and is proceeding at an unprecedented rate over millennia.


================================================================
What Is Climate Change?

Climate change is a long-term change in the average weather patterns that have come to define Earth’s local, regional and global climates. These changes have a broad range of observed effects that are synonymous with the term.

Changes observed in Earth’s climate since the mid-20th century are driven by human activities, particularly fossil fuel burning, which increases heat-trapping greenhouse gas levels in Earth’s atmosphere, raising Earth’s average surface temperature.


Natural processes, which have been overwhelmed by human activities, can also contribute to climate change, including internal variability (e.g., cyclical ocean patterns like El Niño, La Niña and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation) and external forcings (e.g., volcanic activity, changes in the Sun’s energy output, variations in Earth’s orbit).


Scientists use observations from the ground, air, and space, along with computer models, to monitor and study past, present, and future climate change.


Climate data records provide evidence of climate change key indicators, such as global land and ocean temperature increases; rising sea levels; ice loss at Earth’s poles and in mountain glaciers; frequency and severity changes in extreme weather such as hurricanes, heatwaves, wildfires, droughts, floods, and precipitation; and cloud and vegetation cover changes.


===============================================================
Find Out More: A Guide to NASA’s Global Climate Change Website
This website provides a high-level overview of some of the known causes, effects and indications of global climate change:

Evidence. Brief descriptions of some of the key scientific observations that our planet is undergoing abrupt climate change.