Liberal Forum

Zeets2 » 06 Aug 2023, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 9:29 am

If all that were true, it ought to be a simple thing for you idiots to prove how those dozens of ridiculous "predictions" have come to pass!

So why can't you answer to the fact that you STILL believe in the hoax DESPITE the evidence of all those phony predictions failing to be accurate?

Want to try again for the gold ring?
Great!  This should be an easy one for any who believe in the hoax. 
Explain these photos for us, will you?:

  
 
Why are those such tough questions?  
How is it that we see your tail lights running away from such simple questions you can't answer every time you're faced with them at breakneck speed?

Yer racist.     

roadkill » 06 Aug 2023, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 9:49 am

Yer racist.   

I'm sure they believe that Plymouth Rock and the Statue of Liberty are racist, since they refuse to conform to believing in the hoax, and the rest of us who are actually using their God-given intelligence are ALSO racist because we refuse to swallow their ridiculous ****!

But what should we expect when THEY'RE happy to rely on the admonition coming from a retarded teenager instead of a proven authority on the subject?
 
 lies as they do!
 

Zeets2 » 06 Aug 2023, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 9:59 am

I'm sure they believe that Plymouth Rock and the Statue of Liberty are racist, since they refuse to conform to believing in the hoax, and the rest of us who are actually using their God-given intelligence are ALSO racist because we refuse to swallow their ridiculous ****!

But what should we expect when THEY'RE happy to rely on the admonition coming from a retarded teenager instead of a proven authority on the subject?
 
 lies as they do!

Greta is definitely clueless and is being used and she loves the attention.

Greta testified in Congress, sort of. When she was asked specifics questions by a member of Congress she told him to see a climate document that she cited and she would NOT answer the questions herself.  I've also seen videos where she was asked certain questions at different events and she wouldn't respond and her handlers provide her with cover.
 

roadkill » 06 Aug 2023, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 10:08 am

Greta is definitely clueless and is being used and she loves the attention.

Greta testified in Congress, sort of. When she was asked specifics questions by a member of Congress she told him to see a climate document that she cited and she would NOT answer the questions herself.  I've also seen videos where she was asked certain questions at different events and she wouldn't respond and her handlers provide her with cover.

All in the attempt by the lying scumbag media to push their phony climate agenda and try to make us feel guilty about our modernity.

Isn't funny that Greta doesn't go to China and India to push her **** and demand THEY stop using fossil fuels when they're by far the biggest polluters on earth?
 

jack » 05 Aug 2023, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2023, 4:14 pm

For all I know online there aren't any with reviews attached. What of it? 

That's what I thought.

You get your "science" from MSM priests - not from scientists.

Sorry, fruitcake. I'm not teaching a dick sucker how to find and read peer reviewed science. Google it for yourself.

Cannonpointer » 06 Aug 2023, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 12:49 pm

That's what I thought.

You get your "science" from MSM priests - not from scientists.

Sorry, fruitcake. I'm not teaching a dick sucker how to find and read peer reviewed science. Google it for yourself.

That's the thing about LWNJs.

When it comes to actually having REAL scientific anything they can refer to, they have NOTHING. But when you shove it up their ASSES, they start with the "climate denier" ****. Fact is, NO  ONE denies that there isn't a climate. What THEY want is a "static" climate, fully predictable and with a belief that THEY can control it.

The REALITY is far different. Our climate is DYNAMIC, ever changing from NATURAL causes with a wide variability, and UNCONTROLLABLE no matter how much anyone thinks they can. The REALITY of this planet is that it's been UNDER ICE far more recently than they realize- as in a little over 15,000 years ago. Funny how they REFUSE to reference that one in that we are STILL in an inter-glacial period and NOT totally out of that era. There are proxy records that PROVE that this planet has experienced periods of ZERO ICE on the poles and the land masses. There was NO climate emergency then, and plants and animals PROSPERED. Add to that the CO2 levels were MUCH LOWER during that time as well. Which kicks their little CO2 theory up the asshole.

Cannonpointer » 06 Aug 2023, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 12:49 pm

That's what I thought.

You get your "science" from MSM priests - not from scientists.

Sorry, fruitcake. I'm not teaching a dick sucker how to find and read peer reviewed science. Google it for yourself.

"My science". Says it in a nutshell. Let's hear about your science. What is your view of quantum mechanics? If not that, something more talked about, is the universe expanding? How about germ theory? Do you accept germ theory, ever seen a germ or if you have how did you know it was a germ or what germs do? The anti climate change crowd doesn't know any more about any of that than it does about climate science.

This pseudo debate on climate change isn't about science at all. It's about social policies the Right is afraid of and this spurs a clamoring of dumbbells not against what they don't like, the social policies, but against the science that threatens to cause them. It's a farce. And, as it happens, a farce is what ignoramuses on the Right are well made for.
 

jack » 06 Aug 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 1:49 pm

"My science". Says in a nutshell. Let's hear about your science.

Let's not, ***. 

You ran your dick kisser about right wingers and science. 

I established you have zero familiarity with actual science. 

That was my entire intention. I do not consider you educable or dignified or worthy, Request denied. 

roadkill » 06 Aug 2023, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 10:08 am

Greta is definitely clueless and is being used and she loves the attention.

Greta testified in Congress, sort of. When she was asked specifics questions by a member of Congress she told him to see a climate document that she cited and she would NOT answer the questions herself.  I've also seen videos where she was asked certain questions at different events and she wouldn't respond and her handlers provide her with cover.

FYI   Greta is one brilliant young woman ......... damn right!!!!!!!!!

Beekeeper » 04 Aug 2023, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2023, 6:51 am

It's more like MANIPULATION OF THE LWNJ LEMMINGS!!!

Via The Australian:

Cliff Mass, professor of Atmospheric Sciences at University of Washington, said the public was being “misinformed on a massive scale”: “It‘s terrible. I think it’s a disaster. There’s a stunning amount of exaggeration and hype of extreme weather and heatwaves, and it’s very counter-productive,” he told The Australian in an interview. “I’m not a contrarian. I‘m pretty mainstream in a very large [academic] department, and I think most of these claims are unfounded and problematic”. …

 Professor Mass said the climate was “radically warmer” around 1000 years ago during what’s known as the Medieval Warm Period, when agriculture thrived in parts of now ice-covered Greenland. “If you really go back far enough there were swamps near the North Pole, and the other thing to keep in mind is that we‘re coming out of a cold period, a Little Ice Age from roughly 1600 to 1850”.

 #

 John Christy, a professor of Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Alabama at Huntsville, said heatwaves in the first half of the 20th century were at least as intense as those of more recent decades based on consistent, long-term weather stations going back over a century. “I haven‘t seen anything yet this summer that’s an all-time record for these long-term stations, 1936 still holds by far the record for the most number of stations with the hottest-ever temperatures,” he told The Australian, referring to the year of a great heatwave in North America that killed thousands. 

 Professor Christy said an explosion of the number of weather stations in the US and around the world had made historical comparisons difficult because some stations only went back a few years; meanwhile, creeping urbanization had subjected existing weather stations to additional heat. “In Houston, for example, in the centre it is now between 6 and 9 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than the surrounding countryside,” he explained in an interview with The Australian.

 Professor Christy, conceding a slight warming trend over the last 45 years, said July could be the warmest month on record based on global temperatures measured by satellites – “just edging out 1998” – but such measures only went back to 1979.

Well, we know this guy we be getting cancelled and labeled a fraud by the left in no time. 

razoo » 06 Aug 2023, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 2:08 pm

FYI   Greta is one brilliant young woman ......... damn right!!!!!!!!!

         

My new siggy. 
 

Cannonpointer » 06 Aug 2023, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 2:08 pm

Let's not, ***. 

You ran your dick kisser about right wingers and science. 

I established you have zero familiarity with actual science. 

That was my entire intention. I do not consider you educable or dignified or worthy, Request denied.

You established nothing. You came off as you always do, an insecure guy living day in, day out on a website, showing a need to mouth his prowess.

jack » 06 Aug 2023, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 2:18 pm

You established nothing. You came off as you always do, an insecure guy living day in, day out on a website, showing a need to mouth his prowess.

p.s. remove that caption under my screen name, you **** coward.

razoo » 04 Aug 2023, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2023, 1:37 pm

You deniers just keep denying then grab your wallets as inflation will go beyond reality then keep a box of facial tissue nearby as you become the cry baby whiners about global warming climate change .

The left should hope it isn’t true as it would be an indictment on the failure of climate change efforts to so much as slow warming. 

jack » 06 Aug 2023, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 2:18 pm

Cannonpointer » 06 Aug 2023, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 2:08 pm

You ran your dick kisser about right wingers and science. 

I established you have zero familiarity with actual science. 

That was my entire intention. I do not consider you educable or dignified or worthy.

You established nothing.

Oh, but I DID, little gay boi - for all to see. You spewed this from your ball washer:

jack » 05 Aug 2023, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2023, 9:35 am

Right wingers are anti-common language.

They sate themselves on insult lingo. They sate themselves on ideological group-think that goes with their dumbed down language.

Actual science is not available to them. They haven't the interest or the discipline to go near it, being sated on what is group-fed to them.

Accordingly, most haven't a clue how to find it, couldn't find it if they tried, and would fear to learn it if it came to them.

And when challenged to produced one shred of peer reviewed science - a single paper from a single journal, - you admitted that you do not even know where to find it. 

After all that mouth sewage about OTHER men's knowledge of science, you demonstrated that your understanding of science is GIVEN to you by the MSM.

Okay, ***. Break's over. 

Back in the lap. 
 
 

jack » 06 Aug 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 1:49 pm

"My science". Says it in a nutshell. Let's hear about your science. What is your view of quantum mechanics? If not that, something more talked about, is the universe expanding? How about germ theory? Do you accept germ theory, ever seen a germ or if you have how did you know it was a germ or what germs do? The anti climate change crowd doesn't know any more about any of that than it does about climate science.

This pseudo debate on climate change isn't about science at all. It's about social policies the Right is afraid of and this spurs a clamoring of dumbbells not against what they don't like, the social policies, but against the science that threatens to cause them. It's a farce. And, as it happens, a farce is what ignoramuses on the Right are well made for.

First of all, THERE IS NO "SCIENCE" behind the MAN-MADE global warming cult and there never has been! 
All the **** you idiots are happy to swallow comes from government-paid "researchers" providing bureaucrats with the reports they're paying for, after being told of the conclusions they want!  If you choose to report the real facts of the climate change hoax, YOUR MONEY DRIES UP IMMEDIATELY AND YOU'RE OUT OF BUSINESS!  So you're given the report and the data you ordered up and want to buy, NOTHING MORE!
I've learned that through personal experience with highly reputable testing companies.

If you had ANY knowledge of actual science, you'd understand that successful scientific theory MUST be predictable repeatedly in continuous testing yielding the same results that were predicted.  For any "scientist" who has claimed that the "science is settled", it would be necessary for them to accurately predict when and why the climate has changed, and so far you leftist idiots haven't gotten a single prediction right in over 50 years, proving that the "science" is CERTAINLY NOT SETTLED!

Now tell me, fool!  AT WHAT POINT IN THE HISTORY OF THE PLANET HAS THE CLIMATE NOT CHANGED?
Those on the right mostly know this, and refuse to accept that liberals want to waste TRILLIONS on such ****, which is currently taking a huge toll on our economy, thanks to your brain-dead, diaper-wearing, daughter-molesting, sentence-butchering, staircase-tripping, tranny-loving, basement-hiding, continually lying, election-cheating, gender-confused, serial plagiarist, who you love SO dearly!
 

Cannonpointer » 06 Aug 2023, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 3:55 pm

Oh, but I DID, little gay boi - for all to see. You spewed this from your ball washer:

And when challenged to produced one shred of peer reviewed science - a single paper from a single journal, - you admitted that you do not even know where to find it. 

After all that mouth sewage about OTHER men's knowledge of science, you demonstrated that your understanding of science is GIVEN to you by the MSM.

Okay, ***. Break's over. 

Back in the lap.
 

No admission, nothing demonstrated besides your own worried masculinity, all mouth. When will it dawn on that troubled mind that I do not play this zero sum game?

jack » 06 Aug 2023, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 4:58 pm

No admission, 

Of COURSE no admission, weak ***. Just a bust out.
 

Cannonpointer » 06 Aug 2023, 6:58 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 6:58 pm

Of COURSE no admission, weak ***. Just a bust out.

You omitted no demonstration other than showing off your worried masculinity, cock obsessive. Try again.








 

jack » 06 Aug 2023, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 7:25 pm

You omitted no demonstration other than showing off your worried masculinity, cock obsessive. Try again.

you have sucked every type of animal