Liberal Forum

John » 07 Aug 2023, 2:14 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 2:14 am

you have sucked every type of animal

Christ, another one.

This place is a mud hole for repressed fifty year olds.

jack » 07 Aug 2023, 5:44 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 5:44 am

Christ, another one.

This place is a mud hole for repressed fifty year olds.

So you admit you are nothing more than a teenage, wet behind ears cock holster for your brand of "scientists' who have ZERO CORRECT PREDICTIONS (test cases) that prove that the SCIENCE IS CORRECT!! SOLID science will always be predictive and ACCURATE. Pseudoscience predictions are INVALID AND FALSE.

Which can YOU point to that proves your point, CUCKY??

See, so easy.
 

Beekeeper » 07 Aug 2023, 6:04 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 6:04 am

So you admit you are nothing more than a teenage, wet behind ears cock holster for your brand of "scientists' who have ZERO CORRECT PREDICTIONS (test cases) that prove that the SCIENCE IS CORRECT!! SOLID science will always be predictive and ACCURATE. Pseudoscience predictions are INVALID AND FALSE.

Which can YOU point to that proves your point, CUCKY??

See, so easy.

I admit I've gotten myself into a forum with intellectual fly weights; in your case highlighted by the assumption that the strength of an argument is increased by using capital letters.

jack » 07 Aug 2023, 6:28 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 6:28 am

I admit I've gotten myself into a forum with intellectual fly weights; in your case highlighted by the assumption that the strength of an argument is increased by using capital letters.

So you have ZERO science to back your claims!!

See, this is easy. Kicking these LWNJ's little cock holsters is so simple. I bet you cry to mommy every night that you are so mistreated. And what you DON'T realize is that you bring it all on yourself with false claims and try to use a pseudoscience to justify it!!

I bet that must really suck for you that mommy doesn't really give 2 **** what you think, huh??

jack » 07 Aug 2023, 6:28 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 6:28 am

I admit I've gotten myself into a forum with intellectual fly weights; in your case highlighted by the assumption that the strength of an argument is increased by using capital letters.

Choosing to insult a poster when you're completely unable to respond to legitimate questions is the mark of a weak argument, and your insults certainly exceeds that criteria.

Libs like you who have been desperately attempting to claim the "science is settled" fly in direct contrast to the scientific method, a process you clearly have no understanding of.  The science IS NOT "settled" by any stretch of the imagination when decades worth of what you consider and believe to be scientific hypotheses have been proven wrong EVERY TIME! 

So, either respond with evidence to dispute the proof of the hoax you so ignorantly believe in as requested or admit the fact that man-made climate change has NEVER been proven, and YOU'RE the gullible "flyweight" who's happy to swallow the **** you've been fed by the left-wing media and every other liberal for decades now!

It should be quite simple for a genius like you to explain these 4 photos, but you refuse to even try.  
And until you're capable of doing so, try to direct your worthless insults to the scientific community who have clearly been lying to you for the past 50 years!:

 
 
 
 

Zeets2 » 07 Aug 2023, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 9:49 am

Choosing to insult a poster when you're completely unable to respond to legitimate questions is the mark of a weak argument, and your insults certainly exceeds that criteria.

Libs like you who have been desperately attempting to claim the "science is settled" fly in direct contrast to the scientific method, a process you clearly have no understanding of.  The science IS NOT "settled" by any stretch of the imagination when decades worth of what you consider and believe to be scientific hypotheses have been proven wrong EVERY TIME! 

So, either respond with evidence to dispute the proof of the hoax you so ignorantly believe in as requested or admit the fact that man-made climate change has NEVER been proven, and YOU'RE the gullible "flyweight" who's happy to swallow the **** you've been fed by the left-wing media and every other liberal for decades now!

It should be quite simple for a genius like you to explain these 4 photos, but you refuse to even try.  
And until you're capable of doing so, try to direct your worthless insults to the scientific community who have clearly been lying to you for the past 50 years!:

 

No thanks on the foolish climate change questions. Might interest you to learn, however, that the Pilgrims first landed on Cape Cod, didn't come to Plymouth until weeks later, would not have been so dumb as to first set foot on a large, rounded rock, and no one knows when the rock in that photographic got there.
 
 

jack » 06 Aug 2023, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2023, 7:25 pm

You omitted no demonstration other than showing off your worried masculinity, cock obsessive. Try again.

I demonstrated that a punk smirking about science does not now how to access and read science from primary sources - relying instead on programming. 

You folded like a cheap suit. 
 

jack » 07 Aug 2023, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 10:43 am

No thanks on the foolish climate change questions. Might interest you to learn, however, that the Pilgrims first landed on Cape Cod, didn't come to Plymouth until weeks later, would not have been so dumb as to first set foot on a large, rounded rock, and no one knows when the rock in that photographic got there.

Ok fool, do you also not know how long the Statue of Liberty has been there?
Why is that evidence of the obvious hoax alone sufficient for you to question the **** you so greedily swallow?
That should be more than enough proof for even a dunce like you to doubt the accuracy of your foolish beliefs, even if you can't explain how the failure of A SINGLE PREDICTION OF GLOBAL WARMING has come to pass.

But apparently it's not, and you seem quite content to bask in your own ignorance. 
 

Cannonpointer » 07 Aug 2023, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 10:48 am

I demonstrated that a punk smirking about science does not now how to access and read science from primary sources - relying instead on programming. 

You folded like a cheap suit.

Oh, primary sources, is that what you think this web site doodling produces? As for what I rely on, one more time: I do not argue the science itself with political junkies; it comes down to ignoramuses throwing web sites at each other like mud balls, peppered with high school insults, as you're a case in point.

Zeets2 » 07 Aug 2023, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 10:56 am

Ok fool, do you also not know how long the Statue of Liberty has been there?
Why is that evidence of the obvious hoax alone sufficient for you to question the **** you so greedily swallow?
That should be more than enough proof for even a dunce like you to doubt the accuracy of your foolish beliefs, even if you can't explain how the failure of A SINGLE PREDICTION OF GLOBAL WARMING has come to pass.

But apparently it's not, and you seem quite content to bask in your own ignorance.

Yeah, I do know how long, do you? I also know about tidal changes. Do you know about tidal changes?

jack » 07 Aug 2023, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 11:12 am

Yeah, I do know how long, do you? I also know about tidal changes. Do you know about tidal changes?

What THAT Statue of Liberty EXPOSES is how **** EASY it's been to FOOL for as many years as you have believed the LIE!!

Other than that, you have ZERO ACTUAL SCIENCE to support your claims, predictions, or anything ELSE that proves "climate change is being caused by CO2". UNTIL you can produce something VALID and REPEATABLE, you have NOTHING.

MODELS are not proof. MODELS have been 100% WRONG, unable to "back predict" and are only as good as the person writing the code to produce the results THEY want. ALL of that makes them **** BUNK!!

Now, "jack",run along, shut the **** up and  admit, YOU GOT YOUR *** KICKED MASSIVELY!!

Zeets2 » 07 Aug 2023, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 10:56 am

Ok fool, do you also not know how long the Statue of Liberty has been there?
Why is that evidence of the obvious hoax alone sufficient for you to question the **** you so greedily swallow?
That should be more than enough proof for even a dunce like you to doubt the accuracy of your foolish beliefs, even if you can't explain how the failure of A SINGLE PREDICTION OF GLOBAL WARMING has come to pass.

But apparently it's not, and you seem quite content to bask in your own ignorance.

In case it didn't penetrate (which would not be unusual with you guys) you fired two supposedly killer shots, laced as always with personal insults, that were, as it turns out, two duds.

Tell us what arguing with a weak sister like you produces.

jack » 07 Aug 2023, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 11:10 am

it comes down to ignoramuses throwing web sites at each other like mud balls, peppered with high school insults, as you're a case in point.

I rely on primary sources, retard.

You don't even know how to find them.

Beekeeper » 07 Aug 2023, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 11:40 am

What THAT Statue of Liberty EXPOSES is how **** EASY it's been to FOOL for as many years as you have believed the LIE!!

Other than that, you have ZERO ACTUAL SCIENCE to support your claims, predictions, or anything ELSE that proves "climate change is being caused by CO2". UNTIL you can produce something VALID and REPEATABLE, you have NOTHING.

MODELS are not proof. MODELS have been 100% WRONG, unable to "back predict" and are only as good as the person writing the code to produce the results THEY want. ALL of that makes them **** BUNK!!

Now, "jack",run along, shut the **** up and  admit, YOU GOT YOUR *** KICKED MASSIVELY!!

The Right must be happy to have you on its side. You want me to run along, shut up and admit I got my *** kicked massively. You're a prize.

jack » 07 Aug 2023, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 11:12 am

Yeah, I do know how long, do you? I also know about tidal changes. Do you know about tidal changes?

Sure!  So which was the tidal change that resulted in not a single coastal city on earth becoming permanently flooded by all those melting glaciers that the idiots you believe in told you would happen?  And since it's clear that those predictions HAVEN'T happened, please explain how you're able to stubbornly stick to your position and call those photos "duds"? I've passed the Statue of Liberty DOZENS OF TIMES in the past several years and I've yet to see a single example of how your tidal changes have affected it in the slightest! 
How many predictions can you idiots get wrong before you wake the **** up and recognize what fools you are for believing in such ****?

And just for the record, I DON'T want you to shut up about your moronic beliefs because you're the perfect foil to point to when proving what gullible morons your side is for swallowing such an absurd hoax!  Hell, I want you screaming from the rooftops about it, which would surely result in even more people realizing the truth about the hoax you've swallowed and what a bonehead you truly are!
 

I dunno? I'm sitting here? August 7?
In a flannel shirt? brrrrr?
Haven't even put the air conditioner in YET? Doubt I will need too? And down ONE fan too?
I've yet to see the Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands cry? OR melt? I came from there! lol-
Before you destroy everything about America that was great -for propaganda? I recommend.. watching the weather for a few years?
instead of jumping on the liberal bs!

jack » 07 Aug 2023, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 12:22 pm

The Right must be happy to have you on its side. You want me to run along, shut up and admit I got my *** kicked massively. You're a prize.

OTHER than the fact all of that actually has happened except you SHUTTING THE **** UP since you are WAY TO much of a COCK HOLSTER to understand that YOU DUG YOUR OWN HOLE to get buried in.

SO FAR, you have produced ZERO scientific evidence that your claims of "global warming is caused by CO2" are valid!!

NOT. A. SINGLE. PIECE. OF. EVIDENCE.

Making a claim of "consensus"isn't SCIENCE, but hyperbole. Something that your HANDLERS shove up that *** of yours constantly and you are too **** STUPID to realize what they are doing to CONTROL YOUR ***!!

We laugh.

jack » 07 Aug 2023, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 12:22 pm

The Right must be happy to have you on its side. You want me to run along, shut up and admit I got my *** kicked massively. You're a prize.

NOw ****, let me SHOW YOU how you get your *** MANIPULATED into a pretzel...

THIS is a story from the Daily Mail. Here is part of it....

 The impact of 'global boiling':

Shocking before and after photos reveal just how much the Greenland...

Jonathan Chadwick
 7–9 minutes

 Shocking before and after photos reveal just how much the Greenland Ice Sheet melted during the 'hottest month ever recorded on Earth'. Taken on June 14, the first image snapped by a US satellite shows the Greenland Ice Sheet just before baking summer temperatures took hold. Meanwhile, the second image from July 24 shows the same region with substantially less snow cover and patches of 'dirty' ice where impurities have become exposed. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech ... Earth.html

Now, that is some "scary ****" to your MORONS who have NO CLUE what the FACTS really are.

The REALITY IS, Greenland's ICE MASS is ABOVE THE AVERAGE for this time of year. From the UK's Polar Portal which monitors ARCTIC and Greenland's ICE SHEET....



Now, the SCIENCE AND FACTUAL STUDIES show that there has been an ABOVE AVERAGE amount of Greenland Ice for ALL of July. WAY above average.

So tell us ****, which SCIENCE do you believe?? The RAW DATA FACTS or your "science writer" who has NOTHING in that article but LIES AND HYPERBOLE to keep you little **** IN LINE?? He even says that "experts say" but FAILS TO NAME THEM OR USE ANY QUOTES FROM THEM!!
 
 
 

jack » 07 Aug 2023, 5:44 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 5:44 am

Christ, another one.

This place is a mud hole for repressed fifty year olds.

more like repressed fake ALEC GOP Tea Baggers and MAGA Worshippers.......

Beekeeper » 07 Aug 2023, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2023, 1:54 pm

NOw ****, let me SHOW YOU how you get your *** MANIPULATED into a pretzel...

THIS is a story from the Daily Mail. Here is part of it....

Now, that is some "scary ****" to your MORONS who have NO CLUE what the FACTS really are.

The REALITY IS, Greenland's ICE MASS is ABOVE THE AVERAGE for this time of year. From the UK's Polar Portal which monitors ARCTIC and Greenland's ICE SHEET....



Now, the SCIENCE AND FACTUAL STUDIES show that there has been an ABOVE AVERAGE amount of Greenland Ice for ALL of July. WAY above average.

So tell us ****, which SCIENCE do you believe?? The RAW DATA FACTS or your "science writer" who has NOTHING in that article but LIES AND HYPERBOLE to keep you little **** IN LINE?? He even says that "experts say" but FAILS TO NAME THEM OR USE ANY QUOTES FROM THEM!!

Daily Mail = among the most reliable sources of fake news ..........