Porn is not allowed. At all.righteous » 08 Aug 2023, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑ I DON'T KNOW THE WHOLE STORY. IF YOU GAVE HIM WARNINGS, SO BE IT.
THEY HAD A PLACE FOR IT ON THE NOW DEFUNCT SISTER SITE, DOT ORG.
IS IT ALOWABLE IN THE WATER COOLER SECTION?
HAHArighteous » 08 Aug 2023, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑ I DON'T KNOW THE WHOLE STORY. IF YOU GAVE HIM WARNINGS, SO BE IT.
THEY HAD A PLACE FOR IT ON THE NOW DEFUNCT SISTER SITE, DOT ORG.
IS IT ALOWABLE IN THE WATER COOLER SECTION?
NO ONE EVER DOUBTED PORN IS NOT ALLOWED. I SAW NO EXPLICIT PICTURES POSTED. MAYBE I MISSED SOMETHING OR MAYBE YOU HAVE SOME MADE UP DEFINITION OF PORN. BEAUTIFUL WOMEN IN BIKINIS IS HARDLY ANYTHING CLOSE TO PORN.DeezerShoove » 08 Aug 2023, 9:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Porn is not allowed. At all.
So beach babe bikinis get pretty **** close these days. Subjective.
If it were stuck there instead of on a POLITICAL board, it wouldn't be AS inappropriate.
When and if I get the tap on the shoulder to clean it up, **** your feelings.
- Sumo making **** up about me kind of blows his "holier than thou" persona.
Why you guy want to share whacking material together seems way ***/erotic/circle jerky.
So enjoy pulling on each other for your jollies... for now.
If it gets out of hand (pun intended) you are also warned. I listen to the guys that run the joint.
Fair enough?
ps
Defunct site sucked. It's **** defunct.
@Cannonpointer
There was a time on this site about 3-4 years ago there was a poster here and I dont recall his name.righteous » 09 Aug 2023, 8:45 pm » wrote: ↑ NO ONE EVER DOUBTED PORN IS NOT ALLOWED. I SAW NO EXPLICIT PICTURES POSTED. MAYBE I MISSED SOMETHING OR MAYBE YOU HAVE SOME MADE UP DEFINITION OF PORN. BEAUTIFUL WOMEN IN BIKINIS IS HARDLY ANYTHING CLOSE TO PORN.
MEN AS I KNOW IT, ALTHOUGH TIMES ARE CHANGING, APPRECIATE OCCASIONAL PICTURES OF BEAUTIFUL BIKINI CLAD WOMEN. SO, IF THERE WAS A PLACE ON THE SITE FOR IT, IT WOULD BE A NICE DIVERSION. IF YOU'RE GAY OR A ***, YOU MIGHT FIND IT OFFENSIVE. HIGH SCHOOLERS, OR YOUNGER, MIGHT FIND THE PICTURES AS A WACK-OFF MEDIUM. MEN LOOK AT AND ADMIRE THE BEAUTY.
I DON'T NEED A WARNING. I'VE BEEN RESPECTFUL OF THE SITE AND OF CP. IF IT WASN'T A PERSONAL ISSUE WITH SOMEONE AND A CASE OF LISTENING TO THE SITE OWNER, I GET IT.
I AGREE THE OTHER SITE HAD ISSUES.
I KNOW EXACTLY WHO YOU ARE REFERRING TO. HIS NAME WAS PENGWIN. I HAD A DEEP CONVERSATION ONCE WITH HIM AND HE REVEALED TO ME THAT HE HAD A PROBLEM WITH LUSTING FOR YOUNG GIRLS FOR YEARS. HE SAID HE WENT TO SEE A PSYCHIATRIST OR PSYCHOLOGIST; FELT HE WASN'T GETTING THE HELP HE NEEDED AND STOPPED GOING. THEN HE SAID HE TOOK UP HEAVY DRINKING.Sumela » 09 Aug 2023, 8:58 pm » wrote: ↑ There was a time on this site about 3-4 years ago there was a poster here and I dont recall his name.
He posted 12-15yo girls in bikinis in the water cooler room. He would even post that in history these
were marriage age girls...that once a girl had a period she was ready.
I sparred with him off and on for 2 years. And he was FULLY TOLERATED.
I recall maybe a dolphin avatar. But this is a FACT.
I like lots of turtles, dogs, fishing, shooting, and women's breasts. Are you a monk or sumpin?DeezerShoove » 08 Aug 2023, 9:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Porn is not allowed. At all.
So beach babe bikinis get pretty **** close these days. Subjective.
If it were stuck there instead of on a POLITICAL board, it wouldn't be AS inappropriate.
When and if I get the tap on the shoulder to clean it up, **** your feelings.
- Sumo making **** up about me kind of blows his "holier than thou" persona.
Why you guy want to share whacking material together seems way ***/erotic/circle jerky.
So enjoy pulling on each other for your jollies... for now.
If it gets out of hand (pun intended) you are also warned. I listen to the guys that run the joint.
Fair enough?
ps
Defunct site sucked. It's **** defunct.
@Cannonpointer
I was just clarifying because it gets subjective.righteous » 09 Aug 2023, 8:45 pm » wrote: ↑ NO ONE EVER DOUBTED PORN IS NOT ALLOWED. I SAW NO EXPLICIT PICTURES POSTED. MAYBE I MISSED SOMETHING OR MAYBE YOU HAVE SOME MADE UP DEFINITION OF PORN. BEAUTIFUL WOMEN IN BIKINIS IS HARDLY ANYTHING CLOSE TO PORN.
MEN AS I KNOW IT, ALTHOUGH TIMES ARE CHANGING, APPRECIATE OCCASIONAL PICTURES OF BEAUTIFUL BIKINI CLAD WOMEN. SO, IF THERE WAS A PLACE ON THE SITE FOR IT, IT WOULD BE A NICE DIVERSION. IF YOU'RE GAY OR A ***, YOU MIGHT FIND IT OFFENSIVE. HIGH SCHOOLERS, OR YOUNGER, MIGHT FIND THE PICTURES AS A WACK-OFF MEDIUM. MEN LOOK AT AND ADMIRE THE BEAUTY.
I DON'T NEED A WARNING. I'VE BEEN RESPECTFUL OF THE SITE AND OF CP. IF IT WASN'T A PERSONAL ISSUE WITH SOMEONE AND A CASE OF LISTENING TO THE SITE OWNER, I GET IT.
I AGREE THE OTHER SITE HAD ISSUES.
YES!! Bingo.righteous » 09 Aug 2023, 9:07 pm » wrote: ↑ I KNOW EXACTLY WHO YOU ARE REFERRING TO. HIS NAME WAS PENGWIN. I HAD A DEEP CONVERSATION ONCE WITH HIM AND HE REVEALED TO ME THAT HE HAD A PROBLEM WITH LUSTING FOR YOUNG GIRLS FOR YEARS. HE SAID HE WENT TO SEE A PSYCHIATRIST OR PSYCHOLOGIST; FELT HE WASN'T GETTING THE HELP HE NEEDED AND STOPPED GOING. THEN HE SAID HE TOOK UP HEAVY DRINKING.
THERE WAS A **** OF PEDOPHILES ON THAT SITE.
Check the Water Cooler for non political, I guess.DeplorablePatriot » 09 Aug 2023, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑ I like lots of turtles, dogs, fishing, shooting, and women's breasts. Are you a monk or sumpin?
MUST BE THE YOUNGER GENERATION CALLING ADMIRATION OF BEAUTIFUL WOMAN, CIRCLE JERKING.DeezerShoove » 09 Aug 2023, 9:12 pm » wrote: ↑ I was just clarifying because it gets subjective.
Sumela is calling this flipped out? He is in "the pattern".
Poking at the edges in a political forum with boobies and making sure tit is in the title of the thread.
He got called on it and wants to make it my fault. More than once. Then lie about it.
Yeah, I flipped out![]()
![]()
![]()
Moved it to the Water Cooler... pretty severe... Now he's making it a "cause".
Join him. That part of "the pattern".
I saw:
Manufactured butthurt and indignation.
Then I thought:
Just post your Circle Jerk in the Water Cooler. What is the big **** deal with you two?
You are flipping out with the "define porno" crap. I don't care.
Whacking Club cares, I guess.
My mistake.
Also, I agree that you have been respectful of the site. No problem there at all.
Maybe I took it for granted you were already butthurt with Sumela. Sorry if I jumped too quick on that.
I remember that guy too. He hated me.Sumela » 09 Aug 2023, 9:16 pm » wrote: ↑ YES!! Bingo.
Pengwin. 100% correct. Openly advocated for sex with underage girls.
But because he was a LIB he was exonerated daily by lib ****.
You guys are misled. Sumela kept starting threads with provocative titles.righteous » 09 Aug 2023, 9:26 pm » wrote: ↑ MUST BE THE YOUNGER GENERATION CALLING ADMIRATION OF BEAUTIFUL WOMAN, CIRCLE JERKING.
MY DEFINITION OF CIRCLE JERKING IS LEFTIST *** MONTHLY OR WEEKLY GET TOGETHERS.
I DOUBT CP WAS OFFENDED WITH THE PICTURES.
IF THERE IS A WATER COOLER, REAL MEN WILL APPRECIATE THE POSTS.
SQUATBOY AND OTHERS MAY TREAT IT LIKE PORN AND BLOW A LOAD ON THE SCREEN
I DON'T CARE. TIME TO GET BACK TO BITCHSLAPPING LEFTISTS
DeezerShoove » 09 Aug 2023, 9:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Check the Water Cooler for non political, I guess.
I thought jerk off stuff was pretty common. Why are we here in a political arena?
Maybe I'm missing something...?
Three basement dudes need boob pics to share and giggle about. How queer.