razoo » 08 Aug 2023, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Thousands of Donald Trump supporters storm the United States Capitol building following a "Stop the Steal" rally on January 06, 2021 in Washington, DC. The protesters stormed the historic building, breaking windows and clashing with police. (Spencer Platt-Getty Images)
https://time.com/6137604/history-insurr ... government
An “insurrection,” by definition, is a “violent uprising against an authority or government.” It is clear that Capitol stormers who dissented against the election outcome, or even sought to obstruct Congress' certification of the election, were rising up against the government
They didn't have enough "guns and ammo stashed nearby" to overthrow ME...definitely not enough to OVERTHROW US GOVERNMENT YOU TOTALLY RIDICULOUS CLOWN............razoo » 08 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm » wrote: ↑ They had guns and ammo stashed nearby so investigation revealed........... at which the FBI would have come in with the big guns and put the violent destructive crowd out of their misery ......... I believe some had weapons with them that day. Two law enforcement people lost their lives.
Any fake GOP presidential candidates will pardon all Jan 6th criminals = of course Rump is thinking he can pardon himself = typical criminal like thinking.
An “insurrection,” by definition, is a “violent uprising against an authority or government.” It is clear that Capitol stormers who dissented against the election outcome, or even sought to obstruct Congress' certification of the election, were rising up against the government.Jan 7, 2022
What the History of the Word "Insurrection" Says About Jan 6
A president can't have an insurrection against his own government. As ceo of America it would be impossible for a duly elected president to incite an insurrection during their term in office.razoo » 09 Aug 2023, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑ Jan. 6 sentences are piling up. The Trump incited “insurrection,” by definition, is a “violent uprising against an authority or government.”
It is clear that Jan 6th terrorists who dissented against the election outcome, or even sought to obstruct Congress' certification of the election, were rising up against the government.
They had guns and ammo stashed nearby so an investigation revealed.
According to Forbes $2.73 million in damages were accomplished by the Jan 6th terrorist. One police officer died as a result of Jan 6th injuries.
I speculate any GOP presidential candidate will pardon all Jan 6th criminals.
Not one President should be exempt from criminal prosecution simply because of being a President. No House or Senate member should be exempt from criminal prosecution no matter what. Who do these people think they are?
Why does the DOJ play favorites to elected officials?
Very concerned citizen ...........
Trump loves the fake republican fiasco it keeps him in the spotlight as he throws the party under the bus = Trumprazoo » 08 Aug 2023, 5:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Out of the many new details revealed in former President Donald Trump's third indictment, the most chilling one may be a discussion between Trump's White House deputy counsel Patrick Philbin and "Co-Conspirator 4" — who, based on the Jan. 6 Committee report, appears to be Jeffrey Clark, a former top Justice Department official in the Trump administration.
That discussion, in which the man believed to be Clark suggests using the Insurrection Act, underscores how Trump's inner circle wasn't simply seeking ways to delay Trump's departure from the White House, but actively gaming out how he could stay in power even in the face of a mass movement to restore democracy — using military force.
According to the indictment, Philbin repeatedly discouraged Trump and his loyalists from trying to stay in the White House beyond the end of his term.
In December, he allegedly told Trump, “There is no world, there is no option in which you do not leave the White House [o]n January 20th.”
Then on the afternoon of Jan. 3, Philbin apparently tried to dissuade “Co-Conspirator 4” from trying to assume the role of acting attorney general as part of a reported bid to overturn the election results with Trump.
He allegedly told that person that “there had not been outcome-determinative fraud in the election and that if the Defendant [Trump] remained in office nonetheless, there would be ‘riots in every major city in the United States.’”
The indictment alleges that Clark responded, “Well ... that’s why there’s an Insurrection Act.”
more chilling conversation:
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opi ... -rcna97773
An “insurrection,” by definition, is a “violent uprising against an authority or government.” It is clear that Capitol stormers who dissented against the election outcome, or even sought to obstruct Congress' certification of the election, were rising up against the government.Jan 7, 2022What the History of the Word "Insurrection" Says About Jan 6