The fact Shokin was already on the scene is irrelevant. Ukraine does not belong to the EU, the US nor indeed the IMF. And this whole idea these entities are so upset by seeing corruption/incompetence in other countries that they have to intervene for moral reasons, is an insult to the intellect of a 10-year-old - at best. Politics around the globe is awash with corruption, including the west. You'd think cleaning our own houses of corruption might be of greater concern, but apparently notmaineman » 13 Aug 2023, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑ Shokin had not been actually investigating Burisma for more than a year before Biden arrived.
Rooting our corruption in Ukraine was a common concern for the entire EU and the IMF. Shokin was doing nothing to uproot it and Biden was sent by Obama - with the blessing and concurrence of the EU and the IMF to try to get him removed. He succeeded.
FACT.
please post it hereneueregel » 12 Aug 2023, 10:07 pm » wrote: ↑ certainly. Lots of evidence someone was trying to obscure the money trail.
https://nypost.com/2023/03/14/us-treasu ... y-reports/“According to bank documents we’ve already obtained, we know one company owned by a Biden associate received a $3 million wire from a Chinese energy company two months after Joe Biden left the vice presidency,” he said.
“Soon after, hundreds of thousands of dollars in payouts went to members of the Biden family. We are going to continue to use bank documents and suspicious activity reports to follow the money trail to determine the extent of the Biden family’s business schemes, if Joe Biden is compromised by these deals, and if there is a national security threat.”
Just so you **** will know.....
Don't forget Tony Bobulinsky...Beekeeper » 13 Aug 2023, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Just so you **** will know.....
Joe DIDN'T HAVE TO RECEIVE ONE RED PENNY from anyone. HE IS STILL GUILTY OF CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT BRIBERY and TREASON!! All it took was him to meet with ONE of Hunter's "business partners" and we have MULTITUDES OF PHOTOGRAPHS showing him doing just that. Along with DIRECT TESTIMONY from Devon Archer who stated that Joe met with, took phone calls from, and ate dinner with MANY of their "associates" from FOREIGN NATIONS!! Hell, even a DEMOCRAT tried to "spin it" into "they were talking about the weather" to COVER for his TRAITOROUS ***!!
THEN we have Joe using his POWER AS VP in the Burisma investigation and getting the PROSECUTOR FIRED who was investigating Burisma. JOE'S OWN WORDS puts him DEAD IN THE CENTER of a CONSPIRACY and he is GUILTY AS **** by his own admission!!
So STOP IT with your **** wanting "PROOF". There is MORE than enough to put Joe in prison beside that POS boy of his for DECADES!!
Joe was just carrying out US policy, even the EU wanted that guy gone they will sayBeekeeper » 13 Aug 2023, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Just so you **** will know.....
Joe DIDN'T HAVE TO RECEIVE ONE RED PENNY from anyone. HE IS STILL GUILTY OF CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT BRIBERY and TREASON!! All it took was him to meet with ONE of Hunter's "business partners" and we have MULTITUDES OF PHOTOGRAPHS showing him doing just that. Along with DIRECT TESTIMONY from Devon Archer who stated that Joe met with, took phone calls from, and ate dinner with MANY of their "associates" from FOREIGN NATIONS!! Hell, even a DEMOCRAT tried to "spin it" into "they were talking about the weather" to COVER for his TRAITOROUS ***!!
THEN we have Joe using his POWER AS VP in the Burisma investigation and getting the PROSECUTOR FIRED who was investigating Burisma. JOE'S OWN WORDS puts him DEAD IN THE CENTER of a CONSPIRACY and he is GUILTY AS **** by his own admission!!
So STOP IT with your **** wanting "PROOF". There is MORE than enough to put Joe in prison beside that POS boy of his for DECADES!!
I haven't. But the LWNJs are going to suicide him or at least try real soon. As they will Archer too. I imagine he will be suicided in prison.
ok what is illegal?
Is it illegal to set up shell companies to launder money? I think so.
who set them up? Who put money into them? Where did the money go that was withdrawn?neueregel » 15 Aug 2023, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ Is it illegal to set up shell companies to launder money? I think so.
Does shady mean illegal?popscott » 15 Aug 2023, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑ There is plenty of documentation of shady dealing.... 170 plus "suspicious activity reports" (unheard of in our country)
a former memo of Comer's bank accounts...
Here is the memo
Comer Reveals New Evidence in Biden Family’s Influence Peddling Schemes
https://oversight.house.gov/release/com ... -schemes/
first memo
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/ ... .16.23.pdf
second memo 36 page
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/ ... .10.23.pdf
This is an example of the reasonable suspicion "evidence" they uncovered that should have had the DOJ all over it
All questions in need of answersBuckNaked » 15 Aug 2023, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ who set them up? Who put money into them? Where did the money go that was withdrawn?
exactly