You have some strongly held opinions. Unfortunately, that does NOT mean that there is any factual basis for them.
So you're telling us the *** engaged in a quid pro quo? The *** held hostage a congressionally approved $1 billion aid package if he didn't get what he wanted.maineman » 10 Aug 2023, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑ The fact of the matter was that President Obama tasked his VP with pressuring Ukraine to fire Shokin
Why did the grandkids get paid? What did the shell companies provide to the foreign countries?maineman » 10 Aug 2023, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑ The old "Biden got Shokin fired because he was investigating Hunter and Burisma" conspiracy theory just rears its stupid head every year or two like clockwork. It never seems to get old.
The fact of the matter was that President Obama tasked his VP with pressuring Ukraine to fire Shokin for his INACTION on addressing corruption in Ukraine and he also had the strong support of the European Union and the International Monetary Fund. Shokin was corrupt and inept. I have grown tired of digging out the old links that refute this MAGA silliness. Your willful ignorance is breathtaking.
^^^ koolaid soakedBuckNaked » 10 Aug 2023, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Why did the grandkids get paid? What did the shell companies provide to the foreign countries?
what did Joe do for the money? Did he get any money?
10% for the "big guy"!!! Tony Bobulinski
HOW MUCH OF THE FLAVOR-AID DID YOU DRINK, BRUCIE?Bruce » 09 Aug 2023, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ Donald Trump’s DOJ had Hunter’s laptop for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and it’s 2023.
Not one penny went to Joe Biden.
Every deal was legal if they paid taxes.
By the way, why does Fox never mention Jake Biden?
Jake must have filed all his returns and paid all his taxes.
While being PAID to the tune of $5 MILLION to USE HIS POWER AS A US OFFICIAL, and that is called BRIBERY!!
And they suppressed releasing its daming contents BEFORE the 2020 election. In fact 51 intelligence agents signed a letter that FALSELY stated that the **** on crackhead hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation knowing the ;etter was a **** LIE. ALL to protect braindead biden.Bruce » 09 Aug 2023, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ Donald Trump’s DOJ had Hunter’s laptop for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and it’s 2023.
Not one penny went to Joe Biden.
Every deal was legal if they paid taxes.
By the way, why does Fox never mention Jake Biden?
Jake must have filed all his returns and paid all his taxes.
There’s evidence of $5 million going into a Joe Biden account?Beekeeper » 11 Aug 2023, 5:08 am » wrote: ↑ While being PAID to the tune of $5 MILLION to USE HIS POWER AS A US OFFICIAL, and that is called BRIBERY!!
What evidence on the laptop shows Joe knew about or discussed hunters business or received money? Please post it here the laptop contents are in another threadBruce » 09 Aug 2023, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ Donald Trump’s DOJ had Hunter’s laptop for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and it’s 2023.
Not one penny went to Joe Biden.
Every deal was legal if they paid taxes.
By the way, why does Fox never mention Jake Biden?
Jake must have filed all his returns and paid all his taxes.
Are you deaf and blind, or willfully STUPID?? Did you see the SAR's?BuckNaked » 11 Aug 2023, 5:55 am » wrote: ↑ There’s evidence of $5 million going into a Joe Biden account?
“Being a crook doesn’t mean you’re a moron, and it would take a moron to do a direct deposit into an account to the Biden family or send him some Zelle transfer. It’s not done. The Bidens are very good at this,” Turley said. “They have been in the influence peddling business for decades. There’s been articles, not just Hunter but the president’s brother openly selling his access according to critics, so they have been at this a long time.”BuckNaked » 11 Aug 2023, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑ What evidence on the laptop shows Joe knew about or discussed hunters business or received money? Please post it here the laptop contents are in another thread
exactly. Trump's DOJ may very well have found evidence that Hunter was pulling some shady deals, but they certainly didn't find ANY evidence that Joe had.Bruce » 09 Aug 2023, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ Donald Trump’s DOJ had Hunter’s laptop for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and it’s 2023.
Not one penny went to Joe Biden.
Every deal was legal if they paid taxes.
By the way, why does Fox never mention Jake Biden?
Jake must have filed all his returns and paid all his taxes.
One would have to believe Hunter was the most functioning crackhead on the face of the earth to be able to swindle foreign countries out of millions of dollars with no ability to deliver any value. I would sooner believe a visitor snuck a baggie of cocaine through security before the White House tour than believe that.maineman » 11 Aug 2023, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑ exactly. Trump's DOJ may very well have found evidence that Hunter was pulling some shady deals, but they certainly didn't find ANY evidence that Joe had.
What kind of recording?Z09 » 11 Aug 2023, 6:17 am » wrote: ↑ There appears to be a recording in the Ukraine that both Biden's demanded $5 million each..
This entire issue would be better explained if we knew what service was provided to get $20 million and why there were so many SARs reported on this money
Claims are always unsubstantiated until they are substantiated. And claims can only be substantiated if there is an investigation of the claims. And there can only be an investigation of the claims if the FBI has a real desire to seriously investigate the claims. And, as it stands now, the FBI ONLY has a real desire to investigate the claims if the claims are against Trump whether true or not. Otherwise they have no desire to investigate the claims against crackhead and braindead biden et al - but they DO have a desire to keep those claims implicating braindead biden's criminality and treason under wraps. And a compliant, lapdog, leftist media make it easy for them to do so.