Liberal Forum

WASHINGTON — Prosecutors from special counsel Jack Smith's office Thursday proposed a Jan. 2 trial for Donald Trump's trial on charges that he engaged in a criminal conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

 In papers filed in federal court in Washington, the prosecutors said that it's in the public interest to have a trial as soon as practicable and that their proposed date "serves the public’s interest and the interests of justice, while also protecting the defendant’s rights and ability to prepare for trial."A "January 2 trial date would vindicate the public’s strong interest in a speedy trial — an interest guaranteed by the Constitution and federal law in all cases, but of particular significance here, where the defendant, a former president, is charged with conspiring to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election, obstruct the certification of the election results, and discount citizens’ legitimate votes," the filing said.

Prosecutors estimated that the "case in chief will take no longer than four to six weeks."If the judge signs off on that date, it could affect Trump's ability to campaign ahead of the Iowa caucuses, which are scheduled for Jan. 15, and it could keep him away from the trail for the entire early-state window: New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada.

Trump responded on Truth Social that the timing "just ahead of the important Iowa Caucuses" would amount to "election interference."Trump's attorneys have been directed to propose their own trial date and estimate for the length of the trial by next Thursday. In an interview last week with NBC's "TODAY" show, Trump lawyer John Lauro declined to say explicitly whether the case should go to trial before the 2024 election but suggested that. He  said Smith's office at that point was seeking a trial within 70 days, while it has had “3½ years” to investigate the case.“Why don’t we make it equal?" Lauro said.

Prosecutors said in their filing, "Not only is this claim impossible, as January 6, 2021, was two and a half years ago, but it is disingenuous," adding that "the defendant and his counsel have long been aware of details of the Government’s investigation leading to his indictment, having had first contact with Government counsel in June 2022."Trump, the filing continued, "has a greater and more detailed understanding of the evidence supporting the charges against him at the outset of this criminal case than most defendants, and is ably advised by multiple attorneys, including some who have represented him in this matter for the last year."Lauro said in court last week he would need more information from the government about the scope of its evidence before he could know how much time it would take to prepare for the defense.In their filing Thursday, prosecutors said they expect "substantially" all of the evidence will have been turned over to Trump’s team before Aug. 28

——

Hit it up Tom T Hall!

https://youtu.be/yw_F4hbYzmo

The hounds are at his tail and he’s looking for a den!

When should the trial be held?

Before the election, but when?

 
 

Meanwhile....the real American city

...under BIDEN REGIME

https://twitter.com/i/status/1689722023314939906

The New American City

under

BIDEN REGIME

https://twitter.com/i/status/1689722023314939906

Bruce » 10 Aug 2023, 9:34 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Aug 2023, 9:34 pm

WASHINGTON — Prosecutors from special counsel Jack Smith's office Thursday proposed a Jan. 2 trial for Donald Trump's trial on charges that he engaged in a criminal conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

 In papers filed in federal court in Washington, the prosecutors said that it's in the public interest to have a trial as soon as practicable and that their proposed date "serves the public’s interest and the interests of justice, while also protecting the defendant’s rights and ability to prepare for trial."A "January 2 trial date would vindicate the public’s strong interest in a speedy trial — an interest guaranteed by the Constitution and federal law in all cases, but of particular significance here, where the defendant, a former president, is charged with conspiring to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election, obstruct the certification of the election results, and discount citizens’ legitimate votes," the filing said.

Prosecutors estimated that the "case in chief will take no longer than four to six weeks."If the judge signs off on that date, it could affect Trump's ability to campaign ahead of the Iowa caucuses, which are scheduled for Jan. 15, and it could keep him away from the trail for the entire early-state window: New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada.

Trump responded on Truth Social that the timing "just ahead of the important Iowa Caucuses" would amount to "election interference."Trump's attorneys have been directed to propose their own trial date and estimate for the length of the trial by next Thursday. In an interview last week with NBC's "TODAY" show, Trump lawyer John Lauro declined to say explicitly whether the case should go to trial before the 2024 election but suggested that. He  said Smith's office at that point was seeking a trial within 70 days, while it has had “3½ years” to investigate the case.“Why don’t we make it equal?" Lauro said.

Prosecutors said in their filing, "Not only is this claim impossible, as January 6, 2021, was two and a half years ago, but it is disingenuous," adding that "the defendant and his counsel have long been aware of details of the Government’s investigation leading to his indictment, having had first contact with Government counsel in June 2022."Trump, the filing continued, "has a greater and more detailed understanding of the evidence supporting the charges against him at the outset of this criminal case than most defendants, and is ably advised by multiple attorneys, including some who have represented him in this matter for the last year."Lauro said in court last week he would need more information from the government about the scope of its evidence before he could know how much time it would take to prepare for the defense.In their filing Thursday, prosecutors said they expect "substantially" all of the evidence will have been turned over to Trump’s team before Aug. 28

——

Hit it up Tom T Hall!

https://youtu.be/yw_F4hbYzmo

The hounds are at his tail and he’s looking for a den!

When should the trial be held?

Before the election, but when?

YOUR COPY AND POST **** IS BORING AS HELL 
POST THE LINK, IDIOT
 

The trail will likely take a month to month and a half for Jack Smith, and Trump’s best defense is to hope for jury nullification and present no defense.

It will be the most spectacular criminal trial since Nuremberg

There is not a trace of doubt Trump and his six cronies plotted to have seven slates of “alternate” electors from states he’d clearly lost dummied up on December 14, 2020 to present to Mike Pence on January 6 to have Pence steal the election.

Only when Pence refused, did a mob of Trump supporters about 100,000 in number, go feral and storm the Capitol chanting Hang Mike Pence!

If televised, which it should be, it will be the damndest thing anybody ever saw.

When should this run, early enough to possibly save the Republican Party or after Trump wins the nomination?
 
 

Sumela » 10 Aug 2023, 9:47 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Aug 2023, 9:47 pm

The New American City

under

BIDEN REGIME

https://twitter.com/i/status/1689722023314939906

         

Bruce » 10 Aug 2023, 10:02 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Aug 2023, 10:02 pm

The trail will likely take a month to month and a half for the leftist kangaroo circus

It will be the most ridiculous trial since Pee Wee Hermans Theater exposure case 

There was not a trace of doubt that Pee Wee pulled out his weenie after yanking at it for 40 minutes and then shot his load at the big screen.
Miss Yvonne testified in court that Pee Wee never fondled her boobies on the set. 

If televised, it will be the damndest thing anybody ever saw, since My Cousin Vinny 

 A Kangaroo Court Trial


 

 

What Trumps see no evil, hear no evil, and talk about something else supporters can’t imagine is that sometime next year, their hero will have to face justice in a federal court of law, just like any other citizen.

In that courtroom the judge will literally have him muzzled if he speaks out of turn, like any man.

His lawyers cannot talk about Hunter Biden or attack the prosecutors,

Trump’s belief in voter fraud is the motive for his crimes, and no defense to conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding of Pence counting the electoral votes.

It was as illegal to request Mike Pence to count illegal votes as it would be to ask the judge to alter the jury vote. The states govern elections, never the President.

The star prosecution witness will be Mike Pence.

Trump has done the crime, but will he do the time?

One juror can save him from up to 55 years in prison.

Every soul alive in America and most of the free world will surely be watching.

Sad,,,

America is dying...

America under


BIDEN REGIME
https://twitter.com/i/status/1689722023314939906

Sumela » 10 Aug 2023, 10:34 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Aug 2023, 10:34 pm

America under

BIDEN REGIME
https://twitter.com/i/status/1689722023314939906

KOLOMOYSKYI AND ZELENSKY ADD TO THEIR COFFERS.

Trump's threatening post flagged by U.S. prosecutors to ...

CNBC
https://www.cnbc.com › 2023/08/05 › trumps-threatenin...
6 days ago — U.S. prosecutors flagged a threatening social media post from Donald Trump in a late-night court filing on Friday.



==================================================================
Donald Trump: threatening social media post flagged by ...

The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com › us-news › aug › donal...
6 days ago — Prosecutors have asked ex-president be banned from sharing evidence with unauthorized people after post on Truth Social.

Sumela » 10 Aug 2023, 10:34 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Aug 2023, 10:34 pm

America under

BIDEN REGIME
https://twitter.com/i/status/1689722023314939906

Only $13 billion, I thought it was $40 billion..

 

https://youtu.be/HY32j4Mat3E
 

righteous » 10 Aug 2023, 10:02 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Aug 2023, 10:02 pm

YOUR COPY AND POST **** IS BORING AS HELL 
POST THE LINK, IDIOT

apparently babs's handlers don't have enough confidence in their info to give out links to their parrots...
 

Sumela » 10 Aug 2023, 10:34 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Aug 2023, 10:34 pm

America under

BIDEN REGIME
https://twitter.com/i/status/1689722023314939906

I don't understand why these people aren't rounded up, sobered up, thrown in jumpsuits and put to work cleaning up the **** they themselves created...wtf...
 

ROG62 » 11 Aug 2023, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2023, 7:11 am

I don't understand why these people aren't rounded up, sobered up, thrown in jumpsuits and put to work cleaning up the **** they themselves created...wtf...

There is something deeply wrong with America systemically. 

Gun violence, tent cities, open air drug camps, mutilating kids genitals, etc etc etc.  

None of this is going to end well
 

Jantje_Smit » 11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am

Only $13 billion, I thought it was $40 billion..

 

https://youtu.be/HY32j4Mat3E

Great video....gimme gimme gimme!!  
 

TENT CITY AMERICA

---BIDEN REGIME

Sumela » 11 Aug 2023, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2023, 9:53 am

There is something deeply wrong with America systemically. 

Gun violence, tent cities, open air drug camps, mutilating kids genitals, etc etc etc.  

None of this is going to end well

Amerika is at a crossroads...GOD has been firing warning shots across the bow since the 60's creating calamity after calamity with increased frequency...the latest is Maui...and of course, it falls on deaf ears as the GODless left cries "climate change"...

methinks we're ****...