They were angry because the Election was STOLEN.. but THAT, unfortunately couldn't be PROVEN...maineman » 12 Aug 2023, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Ooooh...they were angry because they lost? Awww. I guess that gives them all the reason they need to attempt an insurrection.
I don't recall Democrats smashing through barriers and doors and windows at the capitol in January of 2017...do you?
Doesn't matter how many times you repeat this stupidity. Weiss is an ILLEGALL Special Counsel.Bruce » 12 Aug 2023, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑ JESUS **** DAMN **** !!!!
OOOOHHHHH!!!
As many more times as it takes.
Maybe Garland COULD HAVE SAID no, Mr Weiss, you were assigned this case by Bill Barr, who was Trump’s Attorney General, in 2018. Since you’ve been at this five years already, it now looks like you are on a witch hunt against Hunter Biden and President Biden, so go **** yourself Mr Weiss.
And by the way, your *** is fired, get your **** out of your desk and the nice policeman will escort you to the curb.
Instead Garland could have chosen Harvard Law school graduate Michelle Obama as Independent Special Counsel under 28 CFR 600.3
Shall I repeat?
That **** used to happen under Republicans
mainbitch is still claiming there was an unarmed insurrection???maineman » 12 Aug 2023, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Ooooh...they were angry because they lost? Awww. I guess that gives them all the reason they need to attempt an insurrection.
I don't recall Democrats smashing through barriers and doors and windows at the capitol in January of 2017...do you?
Hunter has likely signed waivers of the statutes.golfboy » 12 Aug 2023, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Doesn't matter how many times you repeat this stupidity. Weiss is an ILLEGALL Special Counsel.
Weiss allowed multiple crimes go unpunished by waiting past the statute of limitations, when he could have easily extended that clock.
And then he gave Hunter a sweet plea deal, that also exempted him from future prosecution... but unluckily for Weiss, he landed a judge that actually read the filing and saw the "get out jail card" buried in supporting documents.
lol. Why would Hunter sign waivers of statutes that were expiring and making him untouchable? Are you stupid?Bruce » 12 Aug 2023, 9:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Hunter has likely signed waivers of the statutes.
You could appoint any special counsel you’d like, and the deals Hunter and Jake Biden did were not criminal.
Jake Biden paid all his taxes on time, Hunter was a coke head and blew the money up his nose.
Fox News turns smart people into simpletons if they watch it long enough.
how was anything that happened on 5/30 an attempted coup?golfboy » 12 Aug 2023, 8:59 pm » wrote: ↑ mainbitch is still claiming there was an unarmed insurrection???![]()
I guess mainbitch doesn't remember Democrats gathering at the White House on May 30th, putting dozens of Secret Service agents, and DC cops in the hospital, and forcing the Secret Service to evacuate the President of the United States.
Isn't it amazing how liberals never remember their own attempted coups?
They were attempting to kill the President.maineman » 12 Aug 2023, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑ how was anything that happened on 5/30 an attempted coup?
your point?
That's you're an uninformed, **** idiot.
It is common practice for the targets of both the old independent and the modern special counsel to sign waivers of the statute of limitations.golfboy » 12 Aug 2023, 9:21 pm » wrote: ↑ lol. Why would Hunter sign waivers of statutes that were expiring and making him untouchable? Are you stupid?
I didn't say the deal was criminal. But it was criminally stupid, and when it was exposed by the Judge, it fell apart.
Joe Biden was selling his position in government, and Hunter was the bag man.
If Trump did anything like this, you'd be outraged. Instead, Trump simply asked Ukraine to investigate their criminal dealings, and he got impeached for his trouble. Then we found out he was right.
You can't show me a SINGLE example of a defendant "waiving" his right to a statute of limitations running out.Bruce » 12 Aug 2023, 9:55 pm » wrote: ↑ It is common practice for the targets of both the old independent and the modern special counsel to sign waivers of the statute of limitations.
Why?
They take lots of time, and rarely result in prison time.
Put Trump attempting to reclaim what he might have believed was a stolen election aside. Other than that:
Today, doesn’t it seem harsh to cry for Bill Clinton to go to prison for getting a blow job from a very willing fat girl with a pretty face? Come on. Years later and it’s funny.
What Jake Biden and Hunter Biden did is absolutely legal. No laws anywhere were ever broken by any of their deals. The rich and famous do deals all over the world based on their names. Warren Buffet’s name in your deal makes your deal more valuable.
It was and is, a terrible embarrassment to Joe Biden, who was so honest that from 1972 to 2016, all his tax returns ever showed was his salary W-2s.
Part of the charm of this scandal is Hunter had Devon Archer try and help Joe Biden get a Delaware tax refund.
Think about that, a little.
Joe Biden had over paid his Delaware taxes, and didn’t know how to get a refund.
Under whose orders?
During the Whitewater scandal all the actions had occurred in Arkansas in the late seventies, as much as twenty years before the Clintons signed waivers.golfboy » 12 Aug 2023, 10:01 pm » wrote: ↑ You can't show me a SINGLE example of a defendant "waiving" his right to a statute of limitations running out.
Why would ANYONE do something that stupid?
The Biden crime family is as dirty as they come.
I've asked you repeatedly to show us what Hunter did, to provide tens of millions of dollars in value to the Russians, Ukrainians and Romanians.
But let's make this REALLY simple. Just ONE case:
The Ex-Mayor of Moscow's billionaire wife, wired Hunter $3.5 million dollars.
What did he do for her?
"Most conservatives have condemned the right-wing mob that assaulted the U.S. Capitol. But 10 years ago, Democrats embraced the left-wing mob that occupied the state Capitol in Madison. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) praised the occupiers for an “impressive show of democracy in action” and tweeted as they assaulted the Capitol that she continued “to stand in solidarity” with the union activists. In other words, Democrats were for occupying capitols before they were against it."maineman » 12 Aug 2023, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Ooooh...they were angry because they lost? Awww. I guess that gives them all the reason they need to attempt an insurrection.
I don't recall Democrats smashing through barriers and doors and windows at the capitol in January of 2017...do you?
no... you call me that because you have no imagination.golfboy » 12 Aug 2023, 9:34 pm » wrote: ↑ That's you're an uninformed, **** idiot.
That's why I call you "room temp".
GREAT... lets take a CLOSER look at That...Bruce » 12 Aug 2023, 10:25 pm » wrote: ↑ During the Whitewater scandal all the actions had occurred in Arkansas in the late seventies, as much as twenty years before the Clintons signed waivers.
Almost all targets of independent and special counsel sign waivers.
The reason is almost all special counsel investigating end in deals like Hunter Biden got.
Did Hunter get 3.5 million ?
Google it. Not substantiated. But Weiss knows for certain.
https://www.politifact.com/article/2020 ... -million-/
Did the Jew who owned 666 Madison Avenue get 2 billion from the Saudis because of his wife’s last name?
Fact.
Six months after leaving the White House, Jared Kushner secured a $2 billion investment from a fund led by the Saudi crown prince, a close ally during the Trump administration, despite objections from the fund's advisers about the merits of the deal.Apr 10, 2022
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/10/us/j ... he%20deal.
These deals are legal.
If by some miracle Jared earns the Saudis any money he’d best pay his taxes on time.
How much did Trump get of that $2 BILLION? The crown prince got a 28% stake in Kushner's investment fund Affinity.Bruce » 12 Aug 2023, 10:25 pm » wrote: ↑ During the Whitewater scandal all the actions had occurred in Arkansas in the late seventies, as much as twenty years before the Clintons signed waivers.
Almost all targets of independent and special counsel sign waivers.
The reason is almost all special counsel investigating end in deals like Hunter Biden got.
Did Hunter get 3.5 million ?
Google it. Not substantiated. But Weiss knows for certain.
https://www.politifact.com/article/2020 ... -million-/
Did the Jew who owned 666 Madison Avenue get 2 billion from the Saudis because of his wife’s last name?
Fact.
Six months after leaving the White House, Jared Kushner secured a $2 billion investment from a fund led by the Saudi crown prince, a close ally during the Trump administration, despite objections from the fund's advisers about the merits of the deal.Apr 10, 2022
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/10/us/j ... he%20deal.
These deals are legal.
If by some miracle Jared earns the Saudis any money he’d best pay his taxes on time.
There was NOTHING ILLEGAL AT ALL about Kushners business deal...Buffalo » 13 Aug 2023, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ How much did Trump get of that $2 BILLION? The crown prince got a 28% stake in Kushner's investment fund Affinity.
I assume Trump was pleased to know the idiot Jew that paid almost 2 billion borrowed dollars for an office tower with the address of 666 Madison Avenue who **** his daughter every night has **** the Saudis.Buffalo » 13 Aug 2023, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ How much did Trump get of that $2 BILLION? The crown prince got a 28% stake in Kushner's investment fund Affinity.
Thanks for pointing out just how stupid Joe Biden really is, and everyone that voted for him!Bruce » 12 Aug 2023, 9:55 pm » wrote: ↑
Joe Biden had over paid his Delaware taxes, and didn’t know how to get a refund.