she didn't.golfboy » 19 Aug 2023, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ Why did she go to the police, to report fraud that she was forced to participate in?
And once again, mainbitch displays is utter ignorance of... everything.
I never said indictment EQUALS guilt.golfboy » 19 Aug 2023, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ What does that have to do with your ignorant claims that an indictment equals guilt?
provide a link that shows that Ruby Freeman went to the police to report voter fraud.golfboy » 19 Aug 2023, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ And once again, mainbitch displays is utter ignorance of... everything.
There is police body cam footage, *******.maineman » 19 Aug 2023, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ provide a link that shows that Ruby Freeman went to the police to report voter fraud.
So...you admit you were wrong about intent to harm being a necessary element?golfboy » 19 Aug 2023, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑ lol. You tried to deny the language in the law.
Hell, you weren't even quoting the correct version of the law.
so.... no link?golfboy » 19 Aug 2023, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑ There is police body cam footage, *******.
You've proven over and over that you don't read or watch evidence that debunks your ignorant claims.
Google it yourself if you want to watch it.
Nope. And Jack Smith is going to get bitch slapped by that fact.maineman » 19 Aug 2023, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑ So...you admit you were wrong about intent to harm being a necessary element?
So you didn't say this:maineman » 19 Aug 2023, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ I never said indictment EQUALS guilt.
Now answer my question. Is Hunter guilty of influence peddling? Y/N?
you do realize that, if the documents were in the closet next to the kitchen instead of the bathroom, he's just as guilty, don't you?
Right. No link because you won't watch it anyway.maineman » 19 Aug 2023, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ so.... no link?
Just your assertion as to "body cam footage"?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
lolgolfboy » 19 Aug 2023, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ Nope. And Jack Smith is going to get bitch slapped by that fact.
maineman » 19 Aug 2023, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ lol
Intent to harm is only an element in two or three of the subsections of the act and not the ones used by Smith.
truth hurts, eh?
I most certainly did.
Cool. Than she'll have to explain contradicting the body cam footage of her statements of fraud that she participated in.maineman » 19 Aug 2023, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ @golfboy
I guarantee you that if Ruby Freeman and her daughter are called to the stand by Fani Willis, it will NOT be as a witness FOR the clown
I imagine that Trevian Kutti will be one of the first of the 18 co-conspirators to cut a sweet deal and turn state's evidence.
So you lied when you claimed you didn't say indictment = guilty.