murdock » 19 Aug 2023, 7:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Why? Because it's a **** load further away than the moon is. It has a atmosphere so a lunar module like lander won't work. There is no way to fix anything if something goes wrong. There is nothing on Mars we can use to support life. I'd say we don't go until we can get there in less than a week. **** that coasting for 7 months ****.
OdeToJoy » 19 Aug 2023, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Essentially, they would have to create artificial gravity on the ship, and that doesn't solve the problem when they get to Mars. Mars has slightly more than 1/3 (38%) of Earth's gravity. They would have to build structures with an artificial gravity for the astronauts to live in long term.
They would have to build a spinning spacecraft to create the centrifugal force to create an artificial gravity. When they got there, they would have to wear weighted suits 24/7. I'm not sure that it would be a pleasant experience.
Neo » 19 Aug 2023, 7:38 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't see any point to a manned mission to Mars. Its suicide. Why not get a colony on the sea floor or the moon if we are wanting to accomplish something meaningful? Mars is a dead uninhabitable **** with nothing worth harvesting.
Vegas » 19 Aug 2023, 9:07 pm » wrote: ↑ We should go because technology begets technology. Whatever tech we successfully build that could put a man on Mars can influence even better technology afterwards.
Vegas » 19 Aug 2023, 9:08 pm » wrote: ↑ No problem cannot be solved. It's not about whether or not we can resolve those issues, it's about where our priorities lie.
HAHAHHAAOdeToJoy » 19 Aug 2023, 10:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, if we are going to devote these kinds of resources; I think it should be more than a vanity project for a few peop!e.
We need to rebuild roads, railway, bridges, etc. We need to build infrastructure here; not on Mars.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^OdeToJoy » 19 Aug 2023, 10:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, if we are going to devote these kinds of resources; I think it should be more than a vanity project for a few peop!e.
We need to rebuild roads, railway, bridges, etc. We need to build infrastructure here; not on Mars.
Please tell us moreOdeToJoy » 19 Aug 2023, 10:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, if we are going to devote these kinds of resources; I think it should be more than a vanity project for a few peop!e.
We need to rebuild roads, railway, bridges, etc. We need to build infrastructure here; not on Mars.
I was talking about space exploration
So it can be trashed like every other big project?