You’ve hit the worst problem this nation has today.RedheadedStranger » 21 Aug 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump never had a justice department.
The DOJ during his term was Obama's and Hillary's.
The things is, the DOJ isn't supposed to be partisan anyway... but Garland's Gestapo certainly is just that. The authoritarian leftists like you love it too.
Nothing says democracy like a politicized Justice system.
what year will it make it to trial?maineman » 21 Aug 2023, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑ In case any of you want to go read the actual Georgia laws cited in those thirteen separate Trump charges, here is the list:
1. O.C.G.A § 16-14-4(c)
5. O.C.G.A §§ 16-4-7 & 16-10-1
9. O.C.G.A §§ 16-4-8-& 16-10-23
11. O.C.G.A §§ 16-4-8 & 16-9-1(b)
13. O.C.G.A §§ 16-4-8 & 16-10-20
15. O.C.G.A §§ 16-4-8 & 16-10-20(1)(b)(1)
17. O.C.G.A §§ 16-4-8 & 16-9-1(b)
19. O.C.G.A §§ 16-4-8 & 16-10-20
27. O.C.G.A § 16-10-20.1(b)(1)
28. O.C.G.A §§ 16-4-7 & 16-10-1
29. O.C.G.A § 16-10-20
38. O.C.G.A §§ 16-4-7 & 16-10-1
39. O.C.G.A § 16-10-20
![]()
It never will. I imagine that after the election, Fani will decide that all those court filings that are going to get it tossed means she will drop all charges. She got her 20 seconds of fundraising off it it, so she got what she wanted.
my guess is 2024
Reading your own TURDS again, CHICKEN **** ASSHOLE???
Pssssst. Kneegrow ******* PISSFACE.....Pastafarian » 21 Aug 2023, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑ Racketeering, you putz.
Conspiring to overturn a legitimate election by sending his henchmen to intimidate innocent people i
looking into things his way after he post all his court cases.
Hope this helps, incest boy.
Read this on the Atlanta Cheating Scandal RICOmaineman » 21 Aug 2023, 5:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Georgia law is pretty clear. All Fani Willis has to do is prove that Trump and his co-conspirators committed elements of those crimes listed above.
And actually, what she will only really have to do is to have the ten or twelve of those co-conspirators who make a deal to avoid jail time by turning state's evidence help her make the case that TRUMP committed elements of those crimes.
Does anybody really think that Rudy Giuliani will risk spending what little is left of the rest of his life as ****-meat for a bunch of convicts just to save the clown's skin?
How is it a criminal enterprise to challenge the results of a razor-thin election? How is it a criminal enterprise if the first amendment protects it?The First Amendment protects freedom of speech and the right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.Bruce » 21 Aug 2023, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Read this on the Atlanta Cheating Scandal RICO
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlanta ... ng_scandal
She busted them all but a minor player.
But the trial took eight months.
To save this nation the trauma of that orange haired clown dying in prison, when he’s likely unable to know right from wrong because of raging narcissism, there needs be a way to disqualify him under the 14th so he will plead out with a nolo plea.
Trump challenged the results and lost. Continuing with his challenge after it was exhausted is the crime.Beekeeper » 21 Aug 2023, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Pssssst. Kneegrow ******* PISSFACE.....
How is it a criminal enterprise to challenge the results of a razor-thin election? How is it a criminal enterprise if the first amendment protects it?The First Amendment protects freedom of speech and the right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Trump is criminally accused of political and personal speech protected by the 1st Amendment. When Trump called the Georgia Secretary of State to enlist his assistance to uncover perceived fraud, that was Trump petitioning a government official for redress of Grievance. The same for when Trump implored Vice President Pence to reject electors from where Trump claimed fraud caused him to lose the election.
Regardless of how you feel about Trump, this indictment should alarm all Americans. We have reached to point where local DAs bastardize the criminal justice process, resorting to “lawfare” to criminalize election challenges.
We are criminalizing political speech.
We are criminalizing the pursuit of legal strategies that fail.
We are criminalizing appeals to government officials for redress of grievances.
You need look no further than the statements of the DA herself to see that this is a partisan political prosecution. She is demanding Trump surrender to law enforcement. She literally wants him in the Fulton County jail. This is absurd. The Fulton Jail is a disaster. It is under DOJ investigation currently for inmate abuse and because of frequent inmate deaths.
my guess is the judge will set an early trial date bcuz Trump cannot be trusted to tamper with witnesses and is a flight risk.Beekeeper » 21 Aug 2023, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ It never will. I imagine that after the election, Fani will decide that all those court filings that are going to get it tossed means she will drop all charges. She got her 20 seconds of fundraising off it it, so she got what she wanted.
HAHAHAHAHARedheadedStranger » 21 Aug 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump never had a justice department.
The DOJ during his term was Obama's and Hillary's.
The things is, the DOJ isn't supposed to be partisan anyway... but Garland's Gestapo certainly is just that. The authoritarian leftists like you love it too.
Nothing says democracy like a politicized Justice system.
You are projecting your own admiration for corruption and treason, incest boy.Beekeeper » 21 Aug 2023, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ So you LOVE supporting a TREASONOUS BRIBERY CROOK!! Who had to create a "new" identity in order to CONCEAL HIS CRIMES!!
https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/car ... -800x0.jpg
You kneegrows are all alike- DUMB as bricks and EASILY MANIPULATED!!
^^^a frog in boiling water.
he did? When and how?Pastafarian » 21 Aug 2023, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑ ^^^a frog in boiling water.
Trump tried to usurp democracy, clown.
Hillary Clinton conceded the election. Trump still has not and did his best to overturn the election results.ConservativeWave » 21 Aug 2023, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑ When Hillary Clinton said much the same things in 2016, initiated BROAD Recount of mostly BLUE states and was CLEAR that she thought the election was rigged, and wanted a RECOUNT... hoping that MORE Clinton votes could be found than Trump votes... WAS THAT "RACKETEERING"... YOU PUTZ... WHAT was the difference?
It was ONLY after they recounted precincts in Detroit and the surrounding areas... and found MORE Clinton votes thn there were registered voters in the precincts that they SHUT IT DOWN !! Didn't want to fool with the Democrat fabrications that THERE WAS NO Voter fraud in Democrat precincts !
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/ ... /95363314/
OH YEA... IT HAPPENED !!
Your stupidity is noted.
please post them here so I can review them
If I gave a ****... I don't really. He's not my president and he never will be again... I live in a great state that is getting bluer every election cycle... I have more money than I will need to live like a king until I die and until my wife dies decades after me and we'll still pass on a boatload to our children no matter what happens in DC. **** all y'all.