Liberal Forum

PhiloBeddo » 25 Aug 2023, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Aug 2023, 3:33 pm

The Left hates facts, biology and science. They are knuckle dragging Neanderthals.

That's not nice to say about Neanderthals.      

seems like pretty tame stuff honestly. I do tire of the "phobe" on everything. Just because I do not exactly align with something.. does not mean that I am afraid of it or that I hate it. I do not find the trans issue to be all that interesting so that must make me a trans-phobe.

impartialobserver » 25 Aug 2023, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Aug 2023, 3:43 pm

seems like pretty tame stuff honestly. I do tire of the "phobe" on everything. Just because I do not exactly align with something.. does not mean that I am afraid of it or that I hate it. I do not find the trans issue to be all that interesting so that must make me a trans-phobe.

That's what I would say...if I straddled the fence.     

Pastafarian » 25 Aug 2023, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Aug 2023, 2:55 pm

Here is more info. 

Back then young boys and girls were not differentiated. 

https://daily.jstor.org/boys-in-dresses-the-tradition/

https://www.heraldbulletin.com/communit ... 96573.html

please explain why kings would celebrate the second his son, his heir would be born.

roadkill » 25 Aug 2023, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Aug 2023, 3:48 pm

That's what I would say...if I straddled the fence.   

I am honest enough to know and say that I am not passionate about every topic. Trans... yawn!!! So a person is trans____ (fill in the blank with whatever it is that they say)... cool, I dont care. 

impartialobserver » 25 Aug 2023, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Aug 2023, 4:47 pm

I am honest enough to know and say that I am not passionate about every topic. Trans... yawn!!! So a person is trans____ (fill in the blank with whatever it is that they say)... cool, I dont care.

True, I would describe you as careless.

RebelGator » 25 Aug 2023, 5:35 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Aug 2023, 5:35 pm

True, I would describe you as careless.

As opposed to you.. obsessed. Better ways to spend one's time than obsessing about trans folks. 

Pastafarian » 25 Aug 2023, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Aug 2023, 2:55 pm

Here is more info. 

Back then young boys and girls were not differentiated. 

https://daily.jstor.org/boys-in-dresses-the-tradition/

https://www.heraldbulletin.com/communit ... 96573.html

I'm not going to get into a pissing contest.

"Back then young boys and girls were not differentiated."

Your statement is ridiculous. They have ALWAYS been considered different.
What **** planet are you trying to base this on?

The progs of today have you firmly by the pubes if you actually believe that in any literal sense.
 

DeezerShoove » 25 Aug 2023, 7:16 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Aug 2023, 7:16 pm

I'm not going to get into a pissing contest.

"Back then young boys and girls were not differentiated."

Your statement is ridiculous. They have ALWAYS been considered different.
What **** planet are you trying to base this on?

The progs of today have you firmly by the pubes if you actually believe that in any literal sense.

I hate to burst your bubble but young  boys and girls were not differentiated bcuz parents did not know if they would love to be five. 

Don’t get mad at me if your daddy was dressed in a dress. 
 

jerrab » 25 Aug 2023, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Aug 2023, 3:48 pm

please explain why kings would celebrate the second his son, his heir would be born.

Bcuz he had an heir. Didn’t mean his heir lived long or wasn’t dressed as a girl for a while. 
 

roadkill » 25 Aug 2023, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Aug 2023, 3:30 pm

A sweet picture of you...with yer little boy kilt.   They must have worn the bun in the back of the head in them days.          

^^^^ picture hanging on Roadkill’s bedroom wall. 

Pastafarian » 26 Aug 2023, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2023, 6:57 am

Bcuz he had an heir. Didn’t mean his heir lived long or wasn’t dressed as a girl for a while.

it has already been explained that wearing a dress was for easier diaper changes.

men did not wear pants in Christ's time, they wore robes. are you saying that they did not care about gender back then?

 

Pastafarian » 26 Aug 2023, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑

26 Aug 2023, 6:55 am

I hate to burst your bubble but young  boys and girls were not differentiated bcuz parents did not know if they would love to be five. 

Don’t get mad at me if your daddy was dressed in a dress.

You are still trying to wet on people's shoes about this.
Here's your bubble burst: *** will always be weirdo-outliers.

Homosexuals aren't so bad. It's the bitchy ones causing all your troubles.  

ConsRule » 25 Aug 2023, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

25 Aug 2023, 9:27 am

Too bad he caved.  He should have stood by his comments.

.
He should have double down !
.
.
.
 

roadkill » 25 Aug 2023, 5:12 am » wrote: ↑

25 Aug 2023, 5:12 am

"Last night at a concert in New Jersey, rock legend Carlos Santana said “when God made you and me, before we came out of the womb, you know who you are and what you are… a woman is a woman and a man is a man.”".
 

. 

Carlos should have just kept to working his Paul Reed Smith guitars.
Sweet instruments.