Liberals don't read.
golfboy » 25 Aug 2023, 6:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Liberals don't read.
And they would burst into flames if they read anything from The Federalist.
Aaah the dems...Majik » 25 Aug 2023, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑ https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/25/wh ... -in-court/
it's a good read....
The Federalist Papers have nothing to say about the 14th Amendment.Majik » 25 Aug 2023, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑ https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/25/wh ... -in-court/
it's a good read....
ding, ding, ding....the ******* alarm is ringingXavier_Onassis » 25 Aug 2023, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑ The Federalist Papers have nothing to say about the 14th Amendment.
In the same way that Thomas Jefferson has offered no opinion about the new Tesla.
Please tell me why Trump has been impeached twice, and indicted 4 times, and no one has alleged he led an insurrection?Bruce » 25 Aug 2023, 10:34 pm » wrote: ↑ The most conservative scholars use originalism to read the constitution.
—-
Originalism is a theory of the interpretation of legal texts, including the text of the Constitution. Originalists believe that the constitutional text ought to be given the original public meaning that it would have had at the time that it became law.
—-
In 1868 the public had just spent four years and 300,000 dead United States solders putting down a rebellion.
The public in 1868 would have imprisoned every false elector and every rebel on January 6 for life, and hung Trump and his gaggle of conspirators as high as Haman.
The meaning of the rebellion and insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment should be clear and certain to every school child in the eighth grade.
I will never understand the crocodile tears wept by liberals over January 6th. It was an hours long **** show that paled in comparison to any one of the 587 blm love riots that democrats gave vocal and financial support to. I could perhaps understand the outrage if June 6th, July 6th, August 6th, September 6th, and October 6th riots hadn't occurred, but they did.Bruce » 25 Aug 2023, 10:34 pm » wrote: ↑ The most conservative scholars use originalism to read the constitution.
—-
Originalism is a theory of the interpretation of legal texts, including the text of the Constitution. Originalists believe that the constitutional text ought to be given the original public meaning that it would have had at the time that it became law.
—-
In 1868 the public had just spent four years and 300,000 dead United States solders putting down a rebellion.
The public in 1868 would have imprisoned every false elector and every rebel on January 6 for life, and hung Trump and his gaggle of conspirators as high as Haman.
The meaning of the rebellion and insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment should be clear and certain to every school child in the eighth grade.
Xavier_Onassis » 25 Aug 2023, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑ The Federalist Papers have nothing to say about
child rape.
So will continue raping kids
The Federalist is always fake news and right wing fascist activity plus spreads lies ..........Majik » 25 Aug 2023, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑ https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/25/wh ... -in-court/
it's a good read....
Neo » 25 Aug 2023, 10:46 pm » wrote: ↑ I will never understand the crocodile tears wept by liberals over January 6th. It was an hours long **** show that paled in comparison to any one of the 587 blm love riots that democrats gave vocal and financial support to. I could perhaps understand the outrage if June 6th, July 6th, August 6th, September 6th, and October 6th riots hadn't occurred, but they did.
Oh please. Trump gave them a huge tax cut. Cut regulations for them. They love Trump.walkingstick » 26 Aug 2023, 1:13 am » wrote: ↑ people like trump are a threat to the power mad government politicians and workers. trump was one of a few who desired draining the swamp. now the political swamp rats are out to get trump. do you support freedom in usa? or letting the swamp rats run your nation?
Everyone KNOWS you are a MORONIC ****, and as always, you RUN THAT DIARRHEA MOUTH of yours and PROVE IT!!Xavier_Onassis » 25 Aug 2023, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑ The Federalist Papers have nothing to say about the 14th Amendment.
In the same way that Thomas Jefferson has offered no opinion about the new Tesla.
Excuse me?golfboy » 25 Aug 2023, 10:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Please tell me why Trump has been impeached twice, and indicted 4 times, and no one has alleged he led an insurrection?
Bueller?