Liberal Forum

Vegas » 10 Sep 2023, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2023, 11:42 am

It's rare. Very rare. Sure, it happens, but most of her posts are links after links after links.

when someone calls you a liar 

it is how you prove your point

depending On where it came from 

Does signed affidavits under the penalty of perjury count as election fraud claims that were never considered by the court systems?

Were are the links to the results 

OdeToJoy » 10 Sep 2023, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2023, 10:25 am

Beekeeper » 10 Sep 2023, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2023, 8:44 am

And YOU need to quit being a TOTAL CHICKEN **** and stop ignoring those people WHO CONTINUALLY KICK YOUR COMMIE ***!!!

Otherwise, you have no debate, but an ECHO CHAMBER that you only hear YOUR OWN **** THAT HAPPENS TO BE LIES 98% of the time!!

16 prosecutors tell Barr there’s no evidence of election fraud
PUBLISHED SAT, NOV 14 2020

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/14/16-pros ... fraud.html

There is no evidence of voter fraud or other irregularities that could substantially impact the election, 16 federal prosecutors charged with investigating election crimes have said in a letter to Attorney General William Barr, NBC News reported early Saturday.

.

 

 ""Sixteen assistant U.S. attorneys"" please provide us with this "letter" from these attorneys to Barr... What are the names of the 16... 
Fake WaPo is the one running their fairy tale article that they claim to have seen a secret unverified "In a letter — an image of which was shown to The Washington Post" by unnamed anonymous sources which is just more fake news the left eats up.... please show us this letter or stop posting lies and misinformation.. The fake WaPo keeps feeding the left crap sandwiches and the left just eats them up...
https://archive.ph/Xh58q#selection-983.0-983.64

Does signed affidavits under the penalty of perjury count as election fraud claims that were never considered by the court systems? Courts refusing to hear evidence of election fraud is not the same as saying the evidence doesn't exist.

Ask again about election fraud and interference... throw in Twitter file, 2000 mules, illegal voting rule changes (that were never rescinded after Covid).... many sworn affidavit under penalty of perjury by witnesses...

In your face election interference... thanks to Just the news they have published an email between Morell and Brennan as they colluded to interfere in our election..... in favor of Biden... Brennan was all in on the fraud 51 intel letter... the sad part... they will try to pull this kind of stunt again because.... no one will be held accountable.

""There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what he’s accusing me of is a Russian plant. They have said that this has all the … five former heads of the CIA, both parties, say what he’s saying is a bunch of garbage. Nobody believes it except him and his good friend, Rudy Giuliani."" Biden

""You mean the laptop is now another Russia, Russia, Russia hoax? You got to be kidding me-"" ""This is where he’s going. The laptop is Russia, Russia, Russia?"" Trump.
Presidential debate Biden/Trump
https://www.rev.com/blog/transcript...den-final-presidential-debate-transcript-2020

https://justthenews.com/accountabil...-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
https://justthenews.com/sites/default/f ... ct2020.pdf



 




 

popscott » 10 Sep 2023, 8:59 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2023, 8:59 pm

Does signed affidavits under the penalty of perjury count as election fraud claims that were never considered by the court systems?

Were are the links to the results 

 ""Sixteen assistant U.S. attorneys"" please provide us with this "letter" from these attorneys to Barr... What are the names of the 16... 
Fake WaPo is the one running their fairy tale article that they claim to have seen a secret unverified "In a letter — an image of which was shown to The Washington Post" by unnamed anonymous sources which is just more fake news the left eats up.... please show us this letter or stop posting lies and misinformation.. The fake WaPo keeps feeding the left crap sandwiches and the left just eats them up...
https://archive.ph/Xh58q#selection-983.0-983.64

Does signed affidavits under the penalty of perjury count as election fraud claims that were never considered by the court systems? Courts refusing to hear evidence of election fraud is not the same as saying the evidence doesn't exist.

Ask again about election fraud and interference... throw in Twitter file, 2000 mules, illegal voting rule changes (that were never rescinded after Covid).... many sworn affidavit under penalty of perjury by witnesses...

In your face election interference... thanks to Just the news they have published an email between Morell and Brennan as they colluded to interfere in our election..... in favor of Biden... Brennan was all in on the fraud 51 intel letter... the sad part... they will try to pull this kind of stunt again because.... no one will be held accountable.

""There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what he’s accusing me of is a Russian plant. They have said that this has all the … five former heads of the CIA, both parties, say what he’s saying is a bunch of garbage. Nobody believes it except him and his good friend, Rudy Giuliani."" Biden

""You mean the laptop is now another Russia, Russia, Russia hoax? You got to be kidding me-"" ""This is where he’s going. The laptop is Russia, Russia, Russia?"" Trump.
Presidential debate Biden/Trump
https://www.rev.com/blog/transcript...den-final-presidential-debate-transcript-2020

https://justthenews.com/accountabil...-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
https://justthenews.com/sites/default/f ... ct2020.pdf

That is an absolutely incomprehensible post.  

OdeToJoy » 10 Sep 2023, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2023, 9:59 pm

That is an absolutely incomprehensible post.

Great.... show us the letter to Barr from the 16 attorneys...
 

popscott » 10 Sep 2023, 10:37 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2023, 10:37 pm

Great.... show us the letter to Barr from the 16 attorneys...

When you show me a single court case Trump has won showing extensive voter fraud.

OdeToJoy » 11 Sep 2023, 3:32 am » wrote: ↑

11 Sep 2023, 3:32 am

When you show me a single court case Trump has won showing extensive voter fraud.

Courts refusing to hear evidence of election fraud is not the same as saying the evidence doesn't exist.

It is not Trump's job.... election fraud of a federal presidential election is investigated by the DOJ and their findings of evidence is brought before the courts... looks like you missed a simple step in the process... your non logic is no more logical than you claiming to see a murder and throwing a dead body up on the judges bench as your evidence, without law enforcement collecting the evidence ....

Please tell us where Trump would obtain any evidence of voter fraud? TELL US EXACTLY where this evidence is physically located and who has possession of this evidence? Yep... the accused has possession of this evidence.... video footage, actual ballots being disputed and all are locked up by the accused...never any honest thorough DOJ investigation to bring to court.. Please tell us physically were this evidence of voter fraud is located..If a sworn affidavit claim that a poll watchers saw unsigned ballots... is that poll watchers suppose to walk over and take the ballot for evidence? Is that how that works? One claim ballots being signed in the parking lot... how is that person suppose to obtain the video surveillance of the parking lot?


 

Let Biden speak for himself

Joe Biden says he's built most extensive "voter fraud" org in history

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGRnhBmHYN0

popscott » 11 Sep 2023, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

11 Sep 2023, 7:00 am

Courts refusing to hear evidence of election fraud is not the same as saying the evidence doesn't exist.

It is not Trump's job.... election fraud of a federal presidential election is investigated by the DOJ and their findings of evidence is brought before the courts... looks like you missed a simple step in the process... your non logic is no more logical than you claiming to see a murder and throwing a dead body up on the judges bench as your evidence, without law enforcement collecting the evidence ....

Please tell us where Trump would obtain any evidence of voter fraud? TELL US EXACTLY where this evidence is physically located and who has possession of this evidence? Yep... the accused has possession of this evidence.... video footage, actual ballots being disputed and all are locked up by the accused...never any honest thorough DOJ investigation to bring to court.. Please tell us physically were this evidence of voter fraud is located..If a sworn affidavit claim that a poll watchers saw unsigned ballots... is that poll watchers suppose to walk over and take the ballot for evidence? Is that how that works? One claim ballots being signed in the parking lot... how is that person suppose to obtain the video surveillance of the parking lot?

So... really...all you have are allegations, suspicions, and anomalies all bolstered by this fervent belief of yours that the majority of American voters could not possibly have failed to embrace the carnival clown as passionately and uncritically as you did?  Have I got that right?

popscott » 11 Sep 2023, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

11 Sep 2023, 7:00 am

Courts refusing to hear evidence of election fraud is not the same as saying the evidence doesn't exist.

It is not Trump's job.... election fraud of a federal presidential election is investigated by the DOJ and their findings of evidence is brought before the courts.

It looks like you missed the fact that it was TRUMP'S OWN DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE!  He had the opportunity, over four years, to fill the entire department with adoring sycophants like he did with 42% of SCOTUS.  If there were any real evidence of voter fraud, all those Trump-appointed judges would NOT have rendered summary judgments against Team Kraken.

popscott » 11 Sep 2023, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

11 Sep 2023, 7:00 am

Courts refusing to hear evidence of election fraud is not the same as saying the evidence doesn't exist.

It is not Trump's job.... election fraud of a federal presidential election is investigated by the DOJ and their findings of evidence is brought before the courts... looks like you missed a simple step in the process... your non logic is no more logical than you claiming to see a murder and throwing a dead body up on the judges bench as your evidence, without law enforcement collecting the evidence ....

Please tell us where Trump would obtain any evidence of voter fraud? TELL US EXACTLY where this evidence is physically located and who has possession of this evidence? Yep... the accused has possession of this evidence.... video footage, actual ballots being disputed and all are locked up by the accused...never any honest thorough DOJ investigation to bring to court.. Please tell us physically were this evidence of voter fraud is located..If a sworn affidavit claim that a poll watchers saw unsigned ballots... is that poll watchers suppose to walk over and take the ballot for evidence? Is that how that works? One claim ballots being signed in the parking lot... how is that person suppose to obtain the video surveillance of the parking lot?

What these **** haven't figured out is that the PEOPLE who COMMITTED THE FRAUD are the ones also INVESTIGATING that same "fraud", so of course there will be NO "Election fraud" discovered. A nice cushy job once you get it.

popscott » 11 Sep 2023, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

11 Sep 2023, 7:00 am

Courts refusing to hear evidence of election fraud is not the same as saying the evidence doesn't exist.

It is not Trump's job.... election fraud of a federal presidential election is investigated by the DOJ and their findings of evidence is brought before the courts... looks like you missed a simple step in the process... your non logic is no more logical than you claiming to see a murder and throwing a dead body up on the judges bench as your evidence, without law enforcement collecting the evidence ....

Please tell us where Trump would obtain any evidence of voter fraud? TELL US EXACTLY where this evidence is physically located and who has possession of this evidence? Yep... the accused has possession of this evidence.... video footage, actual ballots being disputed and all are locked up by the accused...never any honest thorough DOJ investigation to bring to court.. Please tell us physically were this evidence of voter fraud is located..If a sworn affidavit claim that a poll watchers saw unsigned ballots... is that poll watchers suppose to walk over and take the ballot for evidence? Is that how that works? One claim ballots being signed in the parking lot... how is that person suppose to obtain the video surveillance of the parking lot?

The courts heard the evidence.  All of them.  The SCOTUS said there wasn't any evidence.

The problem was that the stuff they submitted wasn't evidence.  It was just made up crap.

Trump appointed judges said election fraud wasn't true.  Republican Secretary of States said it wasn't true. The Trump packed Supreme Court said it wasn't true.  Bill Barr said it wasn't true.

Just because you want it to be true; doesn't mean it is true.​​​​​​​

OdeToJoy » 11 Sep 2023, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

11 Sep 2023, 9:02 am

The courts heard the evidence.  All of them.  The SCOTUS said there wasn't any evidence.

The problem was that the stuff they submitted wasn't evidence.  It was just made up crap.

Trump appointed judges said election fraud wasn't true.  Republican Secretary of States said it wasn't true. The Trump packed Supreme Court said it wasn't true.  Bill Barr said it wasn't true.

Just because you want it to be true; doesn't mean it is true.​​​​​​​

Not ONE SINGLE CASE ever had any COURT HEARINGS, ****!!

NOT A SINGLE ONE!!

Nice try, but FAILED AGAIN, bumbleboy!!