At best you would have been able to fire some shots after your candidate had already been killed and all of your shots would have had numerous members of your own political party in your line of fire.....Bruce » 28 Aug 2023, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Behind that window was my daughter with my AR-15, keeping watch over her.
And my Colt 45 was carried in the small of my back under my jacket.
There were many other Democrats guarding that little college girl, you cannot see in the photo.
He is very entertaining. We must keep him!GHETTOBLASTER » 28 Aug 2023, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑ At best you would have been able to fire some shots after your candidate had already been killed and all of your shots would have had numerous members of your own political party in your line of fire.....
Has he already told the forum that he bench presses 315 and that his fastball has been clocked by Pro Scouts in the mid 90s too...?
There was a parade coming and we set up early.
Wait till she is a granny- Her tats wont look so good! You'll be dead! I want to see some of these clowns at an old age? lolBruce » 28 Aug 2023, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑ There was a parade coming and we set up early.
My daughter said the only trouble all evening was one drunk Trumptard who asked the college girl about her about her tattoo and she pecked on the glass, but the candidate gave a thumbs up, so she put my AR back on safety.
Turns out the Trumptard was a felon still on paper so he was disqualified from voting.
My daughter has some tats, too, but her jacket covers all of them.
But you should see her shoot my AR.
She taught herself at my range at the farm.
Which made me feel very comfortable out to 400 yards when JC and me were setting up across the street.
Black men voted for Trump in record numbers, exit polls show | MyStateline.com
from your link
…..yes, after all, they had barriers all through the Capitol as well, and it was required to use lethal force, by your logic.maineman » 28 Aug 2023, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑ It was a barrier. Officer Byrd was guarding it. There was a mob. The mob broke through the barrier. Byrd did his job. He protected the members of Congress behind the door. The mere act of the mob breaking through the barrier was, in and of itself, criminal, aggressive, violent, and confrontational. Byrd got a promotion, as well he should.
Gee Bruce...this stuff happens a lot from yer side.Bruce » 28 Aug 2023, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑ There was a parade coming and we set up early.
My daughter said the only trouble all evening was one drunk Trumptard who asked the college girl about her tattoo and she pecked on the glass, but the candidate gave a thumbs up, so she put my AR back on safety.
Turns out the Trumptard was a felon still on paper so he was disqualified from voting.
My daughter has some tats, too, but her jacket covers all of them.
But you should see her shoot my AR.
She taught herself at my range at the farm.
Which made me feel very comfortable out to 400 yards when JC and me were setting up across the street.
(as a brief explanation...in my sentence you quoted, I used "protected" as a past tense verb. It seems as if you may have misconstrued it to be an adjective. I hope that helps in your understanding of what exactly I was trying to convey)jefftec » 28 Aug 2023, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ …..yes, after all, they had barriers all through the Capitol as well, and it was required to use lethal force, by your logic.
…..and then you said something peculiar….….”protected members of Congress”. …. really now? …are you suffering from mental illness??
“protected congress”!….wow….
HE might not have been in EMINENT danger, but he undoubtedly - and correctly - believed that the members of Congress on the other side of the door he stood in front of were in IMMINENT danger. Do you think the mob, after ignoring Byrd's demands to stop smashing down the barrier, would have suddenly become obedient after breaking it down and would NOT have burst through the door to confront the members of Congress on the other side?Buffalo » 28 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑ *** cop byrd murdered Ashli Babbitt plain and simple!!! Not condemning him is one thing. However, celebrating him a s a hero for pulling the trigger is ridiculous. Were byrd white and Babbitt a ***, the story would read simply: “White Cop Murders Unarmed Black Woman.” Then, there would be riots in the streets and buildings would’ve been looted and burned. In other words, the reaction would be “mostly peaceful.”
I saw the video he clearly was not in eminent [sic] danger. Killing in cold blood an unarmed female citizen shows you the outlaw government that is in place. When murder is brushed aside like this we are in a dangerous place. *** byrd is goddamn sure not a hreo!!!
“lynching the Vice President”? ….and you know that how? …..did they grab dude? Apprehend him in some way? ….this is getting rather stupid.maineman » 28 Aug 2023, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ (as a brief explanation...in my sentence you quoted, I used "protected" as a past tense verb. It seems as if you may have misconstrued it to be an adjective. I hope that helps in your understanding of what exactly I was trying to convey)
You are aware, are you not, that one of the main missions of the Capitol Police is to maintain and preserve a safe working environment for the members of Congress. Protecting them from an angry mob that was intent on physically disrupting the legislative process and lynching the Vice President certainly falls within the scope of that mission.
Members of Congress were on the other side of the door that Officer Byrd was guarding. Do you really expect that the mob would NOT have pushed through his position and reached the members of Congress on the other side of the door had he not stopped the first one through the breach, or do you think that, after ignoring his demands to cease and desist from breaking through the barrier, they would have instantaneously regained their sense of civic duty and obediently stopped in their tracks once on the other side if he ordered them to?
How do I know that the crowd was intent on lynching the Vice President?jefftec » 28 Aug 2023, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑ “lynching the Vice President”? ….and you know that how? …..did they grab dude? Apprehend him in some way? ….this is getting rather stupid.
……there you go again with an intense stupid, as if the a most sorriest congress is in any way that relevant as to fear for their lives. It’s all just an act.maineman » 28 Aug 2023, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ (as a brief explanation...in my sentence you quoted, I used "protected" as a past tense verb. It seems as if you may have misconstrued it to be an adjective. I hope that helps in your understanding of what exactly I was trying to convey)
You are aware, are you not, that one of the main missions of the Capitol Police is to maintain and preserve a safe working environment for the members of Congress. Protecting them from an angry mob that was intent on physically disrupting the legislative process and lynching the Vice President certainly falls within the scope of that mission.
Members of Congress were on the other side of the door that Officer Byrd was guarding. Do you really expect that the mob would NOT have pushed through his position and reached the members of Congress on the other side of the door had he not stopped the first one through the breach, or do you think that, after ignoring his demands to cease and desist from breaking through the barrier, they would have instantaneously regained their sense of civic duty and obediently stopped in their tracks once on the other side if he ordered them to?
Well I guess I see what you mean. They grabbed him and- oh wait! Pence didn’t get a hair disturbed!maineman » 28 Aug 2023, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑ How do I know that the crowd was intent on lynching the Vice President?
Gosh.... gee... I dunno....
Maybe because they were chanting "HANG MIKE PENCE"?
There's that!![]()
and I would add, if anyone is getting rather stupid it is you, sir. HANG MIKE PENCE HANG MIKE PENCE. What do YOU think those words mean???
Her mother started crying when she saw them and the poor girl came dejected out on the deck to where I was.
Do you understand what the word INTENT actually means?jefftec » 28 Aug 2023, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Well I guess I see what you mean. They grabbed him and- oh wait! Pence didn’t get a hair disturbed!
”hang Mike Pence”…wow, they really got his a$$…whoaaa!
Hey... you wanna break through a barrier in the capitol when an armed law enforcement officer is on the other side telling you to stop, as far as I'm concerned, you roll the ****' dice. The dumb bitch got exactly what she had coming to her.jefftec » 28 Aug 2023, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑ ……there you go again with an intense stupid, as if the a most sorriest congress is in any way that relevant as to fear for their lives. It’s all just an act.
…..you and your fake crystal ball, you don’t know what Babbitt would have done.
If the negro had not killed the young lady, how many bureaucrats would have been hung?maineman » 28 Aug 2023, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ (as a brief explanation...in my sentence you quoted, I used "protected" as a past tense verb. It seems as if you may have misconstrued it to be an adjective. I hope that helps in your understanding of what exactly I was trying to convey)
You are aware, are you not, that one of the main missions of the Capitol Police is to maintain and preserve a safe working environment for the members of Congress. Protecting them from an angry mob that was intent on physically disrupting the legislative process and lynching the Vice President certainly falls within the scope of that mission.
Members of Congress were on the other side of the door that Officer Byrd was guarding. Do you really expect that the mob would NOT have pushed through his position and reached the members of Congress on the other side of the door had he not stopped the first one through the breach, or do you think that, after ignoring his demands to cease and desist from breaking through the barrier, they would have instantaneously regained their sense of civic duty and obediently stopped in their tracks once on the other side if he ordered them to?