HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHARebelGator » 30 Aug 2023, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Is it me, or are the quality of Buckwheat's posts improving?
I think he's having a mental breakdown.RebelGator » 30 Aug 2023, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Is it me, or are the quality of Buckwheat's posts improving?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Poor guy... he's lost it.
If you’ll look you will see they start the first Monday in March, six months from now.Buffalo » 30 Aug 2023, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑ YOU are a ****, liberal LIAR!!! The trial dates were intentionally set the day before state primaries. There were too many to be coincidences.
That action is pure election interference, you lying sack of ****!!!
Trump will not get a fair trial by a jury of his peers in DC. DC voted 95% dim-0-crap in 2020. There are none of his peers in DC!!!Bruce » 30 Aug 2023, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑ If you’ll look you will see they start the first Monday in March, six months from now.
It will take at least the last two weeks of February to select a jury.
They always have alternates, so I’ll bet in such an important case 18 citizens of Washington DC will have to take off two and a half months from work beginning the middle of February.
Hopefully they will be out in time for graduations in May of their kids and grandkids.
It’s a jury trial.
Not just Trump’s time on the cross.
18 citizens of Washington DC?Bruce » 30 Aug 2023, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑ If you’ll look you will see they start the first Monday in March, six months from now.
It will take at least the last two weeks of February to select a jury.
They always have alternates, so I’ll bet in such an important case 18 citizens of Washington DC will have to take off two and a half months from work beginning the middle of February.
Hopefully they will be out in time for graduations in May of their kids and grandkids.
It’s a jury trial.
Not just Trump’s time on the cross.
Maybe then he should have behaved himself better while in Washington D. C.Buffalo » 30 Aug 2023, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump will not get a fair trial by a jury of his peers in DC. DC voted 95% dim-0-crap in 2020. There are none of his peers in DC!!!
Correction:RebelGator » 30 Aug 2023, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑ 18 citizens of Washington DC?
I don't think you have to worry about graduation.![]()
Better be concerned they don't shoot each other in the jury room.
****!!!Bruce » 30 Aug 2023, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Maybe then he should have behaved himself better while in Washington D. C.
18 people who daily toil in the shadows of the great monuments of Washington D.C., ride the early busses to work, and curse the bread and cannot afford the wine, will sit in judgement of of Donald Trump.
Each one will swear an oath they will try the case fairly and without passion or prejudice.
That some funny ****...Bruce » 30 Aug 2023, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Maybe then he should have behaved himself better while in Washington D. C.
18 people who daily toil in the shadows of the great monuments of Washington D.C., ride the early busses to work, and curse the bread and cannot afford the wine, will sit in judgement of of Donald Trump.
Each one will swear an oath they will try the case fairly and without passion or prejudice.
Joe Sixpack doesn’t live in Washington D.C.DeezerShoove » 30 Aug 2023, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑ That some funny ****...
**** JUDGES can't be counted on to be fair.
Why would Joe Sixpack be expected to?
RedheadedStranger » 30 Aug 2023, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑ Judge Chutkan Compares January 6 to 9/11 Attacks, Boston Marathon Bombing
https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status ... 24172?s=20
Chutkan, who was appointed by President Barack Obama and donated to his presidential campaigns, has been criticized as politically biased. She has also suggested, in a previous case, that Trump ought to be in prison.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023 ... n-bombing/
The greatest test of her fairness will be if she allows evidence at trial of Trump’s good faith belief the election was stolen.
I'm not a sitting judge with the ability to greatly affect people's lives either.
You would more likely be fairer than the magic negro appointed chutkan bitch...RedheadedStranger » 31 Aug 2023, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑ I'm not a sitting judge with the ability to greatly affect people's lives either.
Wold you want me as your judge in a case that your life depended on?
Probably.Buffalo » 31 Aug 2023, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑ You would more likely be fairer than the magic negro appointed chutkan bitch...
There is NO WAY Trump will get even close to a fair trial by a magic negro appointed judge and a jury of liberal DC idiots. There is no such thing a a jury of Trump's peers in the dim-0-crap **** hole that is DC.RedheadedStranger » 31 Aug 2023, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑ Probably.
I have never been the vindictive type.
If you were appointed judge a man who loves Willie Nelson can see right from wrong, tell the truth from a lie, and can put aside political leanings to judge legal questions.RedheadedStranger » 31 Aug 2023, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑ Probably.
I have never been the vindictive type.
gee … another black person going after tRumpRedheadedStranger » 30 Aug 2023, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑ Judge Chutkan Compares January 6 to 9/11 Attacks, Boston Marathon Bombing
https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status ... 24172?s=20
Chutkan, who was appointed by President Barack Obama and donated to his presidential campaigns, has been criticized as politically biased. She has also suggested, in a previous case, that Trump ought to be in prison.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023 ... n-bombing/