So? If Trump or anyone else doesn't feel the need to state that their freedom to do so is protected by the 1st Amendment, there's nothing wrong with that! Who made YOU the authority on what a president should or shouldn't be required to say? Unlike Biden, who attempted to install a "Ministry of Truth" to limit speech, Trump has been a far greater supporter of the US Constitution than Biden, and that's an undeniable FACT! And if he feels that kneeling for the National Anthem is disgraceful and should be fired, that's his opinion and expressing it is his right, and one that most Americans agree with, as the polls have proven:jerrab » 31 Aug 2023, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑ nope. trump did not mention the constitution at all. if he did he would have to say that they had the right to express their feelings in a non violent way. what he did say is they are disgraceful and should be fired.
NBC/WSJ poll: Majority say kneeling during anthem 'not appropriate'Eighty-nine percent of Trump voters say it's inappropriate for NFL players to kneel to protest racial inequality.
Aug. 31, 2018 By Carrie Dann
WASHINGTON — A majority of voters say that it is not appropriate for NFL players to kneel during the national anthem to protest racial inequality in the United States, although the country is deeply divided on the question along partisan and racial lines, a poll released Friday from NBC News and The Wall Street Journal shows.
The survey found that 54 percent of voters called kneeling during the anthem inappropriate, while 43 percent say that it is an appropriate way to bring attention to the problems that NFL players and others have cited as the reason for their protest.
Zeets2 » 01 Sep 2023, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑ So? If Trump or anyone else doesn't feel the need to state that their freedom to do so is protected by the 1st Amendment, there's nothing wrong with that! Who made YOU the authority on what a president should or shouldn't be required to say? Unlike Biden, who attempted to install a "Ministry of Truth" to limit speech, Trump has been a far greater supporter of the US Constitution than Biden, and that's an undeniable FACT! And if he feels that kneeling for the National Anthem is disgraceful and should be fired, that's his opinion and expressing it is his right, and one that most Americans agree with, as the polls have proven:
And exactly WHERE did I ever state such stupidity, liar?jerrab » 31 Aug 2023, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑ according to you only trump has any right to free speech. sorry it does not work that way.
the only one you support for free speech is trump. so you are against the constitution too.Zeets2 » 01 Sep 2023, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑ So? If Trump or anyone else doesn't feel the need to state that their freedom to do so is protected by the 1st Amendment, there's nothing wrong with that! Who made YOU the authority on what a president should or shouldn't be required to say? Unlike Biden, who attempted to install a "Ministry of Truth" to limit speech, Trump has been a far greater supporter of the US Constitution than Biden, and that's an undeniable FACT! And if he feels that kneeling for the National Anthem is disgraceful and should be fired, that's his opinion and expressing it is his right, and one that most Americans agree with, as the polls have proven:
Try this quote, nitwit. It seems to suit your limited intelligence level very well:jerrab » 01 Sep 2023, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑ kneeling is free speech. trump is against free speech and the constitution.
bump for @ZeetsPastafarian » 01 Sep 2023, 6:44 am » wrote: ↑ Trump wants to **** his daughter. Now that is some kind of disgusting narcissism right there.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gnKGJ9YNSvI
Zeets2 » 01 Sep 2023, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ Try this quote, nitwit. It seems to suit your limited intelligence level very well:
"Four legs good, two legs bad"
the irony is Trump thinks he’s more equal than others.jerrab » 01 Sep 2023, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ all are equal, some are more equal than others. --trump only is the one who has right to free speech (and his supporters)
There has NEVER been such a stupid accusation of Trump as that by anyone with half a brain!jerrab » 01 Sep 2023, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ all are equal, some are more equal than others. --trump only is the one who has right to free speech (and his supporters)
Still waiting for you to show ANY evidence that I don't support the 1st Amendment, or do you just get off on telling stupid lies?jerrab » 01 Sep 2023, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ the only one you support for free speech is trump. so you are against the constitution too.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/ ... 700521001/
Someone, please find Donald Trump a copy of the Constitution — preferably a simplified version with pictures and charts. Once he absorbs what it says, perhaps he will stop trying to tear it apart.Trump is angry at athletes for exercising their right to speech; but his anger did not begin there. Last February, at a campaign rally in Texas, Donald Trump spoke of "open(ing) up libel laws." He never explained exactly what he meant but clearly is fed up with the First Amendment, which prohibits denying freedom of speech and the pres
**** it you don't, you only support it for trump. by your own posts.Zeets2 » 01 Sep 2023, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ Still waiting for you to show ANY evidence that I don't support the 1st Amendment, or do you just get off on telling stupid lies?
Why don't you go look at what Biden has been trying to do to limit speech he doesn't like for the past 3 years?
You'll find PLENTY of examples that are FAR more restrictive there, and you've obviously been too myopic over those years to notice, and you haven't ever heard that truth on CNN or MSNBC!
Precisely the kind of ignorant stupidity we get from the likes of lying liberals like you!Pastafarian » 01 Sep 2023, 6:44 am » wrote: ↑ Trump wants to **** his daughter. Now that is some kind of disgusting narcissism right there.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gnKGJ9YNSvI
Zeets2 » 01 Sep 2023, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ There has NEVER been such a stupid accusation of Trump as that by anyone with half a brain!
There IS, however, ample proof that the idiot diaper-boy you voted for has done so REPEATEDLY!
Go ahead and try to deny THAT you fool!
Pastafarian » 01 Sep 2023, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ the irony is Trump thinks he’s more equal than others.
Zeets2 » 01 Sep 2023, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ Still waiting for you to show ANY evidence that I don't support the 1st Amendment, or do you just get off on telling stupid lies?
Why don't you go look at what Biden has been trying to do to limit speech he doesn't like for the past 3 years?
You'll find PLENTY of examples that are FAR more restrictive there, and you've obviously been too myopic over those years to notice, and you haven't ever heard that truth on CNN or MSNBC!
So when you see a beautiful woman, first reaction instinctively is doing it. Now when reaction to thinking such thoughts set in recognizing who the female is, that should change one's mind.Pastafarian » 01 Sep 2023, 6:44 am » wrote: ↑ Trump wants to **** his daughter. Now that is some kind of disgusting narcissism right there.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gnKGJ9YNSvI
Wrong, dickhead!jerrab » 01 Sep 2023, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ -----------------------------------------
Who said some people are more equal than others?
A proclamation by the pigs who control the government in the novel Animal Farm, by George Orwell. The sentence is a comment on the hypocrisy of governments that proclaim the absolute equality of their citizens but give power and privileges to a small elite.
So why are you so afraid to comment on the ACTUAL opposition to free speech that Biden has established through his corrupted DOJ and FBI, while focusing on your own idiotic interpretation of something Trump never said or expressed in any manner?
Sorry dickhead, but your repeated lies prove nothing.jerrab » 01 Sep 2023, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑ **** it you don't, you only support it for trump. by your own posts.
^^^^Defending incestuous tendencies.Nostradamus'omh » 01 Sep 2023, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑ So when you see a beautiful woman, first reaction instinctively is doing it. Now when reaction to thinking such thoughts set in recognizing who the female is, that should change one's mind.
Brain navigates space instinctively, intellect compares past with current events to decide if going to do past behavior again in new circumstances all the time.
Remember you are evolving as equally occupying space reproductively here. Relativity is which people are ancestry and non related? You don't imagine life being eternally separated and that created your lost soul never comprehending the proportioned time each gets adapting to the moment here.
You adopt a consensus of opinions created by persons seeking a higher power than genetics eternally separating physical lifetimes now.
So you people wishing now wasn't eternity created situational ethics called humanities to regulate social behavior between those that understand time and those educated to perform career functions cradle to grave pretending life exceeds genetic timing occupying space now. This requires triangulating 4 corners playing 3 other sides against themselves from a separate corner that two ends playing against same center of mutually evolving forward here.
Name a reality that isn't governed that way in history or current events Won't change by race, creed, color, national origin, gender bias, gender generation gap present or historically recorded how they behaved cradle to grave framing current human social behaviors nurtured between all 5 current generation gaps left living here?
Please use all the social consensus arguments ever used sustaining reasonable doubt, means, motives, methods, mayhem, madness, misery is applied to anyone not paying to believe now isn't eternity and life cannot be limited to time adapting in space now capitalizing off loyalty by royal we in command what hope, faith, charity, power, wealth, fame goes to the 1% directing global events today.