Jantje_Smit » 01 Sep 2023, 4:27 am » wrote: ↑ I didn't wonder but just for fun I looked anyway.. notice the 'may', they are starting to doubt their own propaganda, they've got him now.. maybe...
![]()
Not if Trump gets convicted in Georgia.MackTheFinger » 01 Sep 2023, 1:31 am » wrote: ↑ .
Hackafarian...when OMB becomes president again he will pardon him..eventually. after he has done some time.
.
.. .
.
For what?? Engaging in LEGAL political activity, SPEAKING FREELY, and PETITIONING THE GOVERNMENT for a REDRESS of GRIEVANCES??
Nice try.Beekeeper » 01 Sep 2023, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑ For what?? Engaging in LEGAL political activity, SPEAKING FREELY, and PETITIONING THE GOVERNMENT for a REDRESS of GRIEVANCES??
Seems you are ALL IN for putting folks in PRISON because you don't like their LIBERTY AND FREEDOM being FREELY EXPRESSED, huh, kneegrow??
What Trump did was not legal, cultist. And Trump left a trail of victims in his wake.Beekeeper » 01 Sep 2023, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑ For what?? Engaging in LEGAL political activity, SPEAKING FREELY, and PETITIONING THE GOVERNMENT for a REDRESS of GRIEVANCES??
Seems you are ALL IN for putting folks in PRISON because you don't like their LIBERTY AND FREEDOM being FREELY EXPRESSED, huh, kneegrow??
Bruce » 31 Aug 2023, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ WASHINGTON — Joe Biggs, a Proud Boys leader convicted of seditious conspiracy who the government says "served as an instigator and leader" during the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, was sentenced to 17 years in federal prison on Thursday.
It is among the longest sentences in Capitol riot cases. The record is the 18-year sentence given to Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes, also convicted of seditious conspiracy, after prosecutors sought 25 years in federal prison in his case.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna102597
—-
https://youtu.be/kEq-2GsHzhk?si=AT7gW8bguWASlaXf
Trump is 78.
So state the STATUTES he violated in using FREE SPEECH, PETITIONING FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES, and "other" crimes you say he committed!!Pastafarian » 01 Sep 2023, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑ What Trump did was not legal, cultist. And Trump left a trail of victims in his wake.
Stomp your feet, incest boy.
everyone reciting what they believe discuss everything they wished true into fruition of results left governing tomorrows today.MackTheFinger » 01 Sep 2023, 1:31 am » wrote: ↑ .
Hackafarian...when OMB becomes president again he will pardon him..eventually. after he has done some time.
.
.. .
.![]()
You can look them up yourself. I’ll even provide the link.Beekeeper » 01 Sep 2023, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑ So state the STATUTES he violated in using FREE SPEECH, PETITIONING FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES, and "other" crimes you say he committed!!
You have to be the DUMBEST KNEEGROW that ever sucked air.
Oh, you mean a "conspiracy" to commit FREE SPEECH, PETITION THE GOVERNMENT, and to ASK FOR AN INVESTIGATION into real criminal activity?? THAT "conspiracy"?? In order to have a "conspiracy", you need an UNDERLYING CRIME to support the charge.There is NONE.Pastafarian » 01 Sep 2023, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑ You can look them up yourself. I’ll even provide the link.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/r ... -18-allies
Free speech doesn’t count when you take part in a conspiracy. Conspirators need speech to hatch their plans, incest boy.
So you can point to the STATUTE that states the "criminal activity" that you allege is "election interference"??Squatchman » 01 Sep 2023, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑ Nice try.
. First amendment rights go out the window when he committed his crime of election Interference.
They aren't even a consideration when you're committing a crime.
Trump will be convicted. This woman has his number and he's ****. Hard.
And then we get to watch you and your ilk cry,cry,cry. Nothing else. You impotent **** have no balls.
Not at all, retard.Beekeeper » 01 Sep 2023, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, you mean a "conspiracy" to commit FREE SPEECH, PETITION THE GOVERNMENT, and to ASK FOR AN INVESTIGATION into real criminal activity?? THAT "conspiracy"?? In order to have a "conspiracy", you need an UNDERLYING CRIME to support the charge.There is NONE.
Trust me kneegrow, Trump WILL PREVAIL and do so even if it goes to the SCOTUS to achieve. You'll be eating CROW for decades over this complete LUNACY you and your nasty NAZI ILK keep believing.
Uh, ****, you need an UNDERLYING CRIME that was CONSPIRED TO COMMIT!! How **** STUPID are you?? Well, you ARE a kneegrow, so that answers that one.Pastafarian » 01 Sep 2023, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑ Not at all, retard.
We will see if Trump prevails. I only see him prevailing through obstruction from the GOP. 91 charges are a lot to overcome especially when you have more than one co-conspirator ready to give you up.
So, KNEEGROW ****, what CRIME where they conspiring to commit?? And how does FREE SPEECH not apply when "conspiring" to commit LEGAL ACTS and means NO law(s) were broken???Pastafarian » 01 Sep 2023, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑ You can look them up yourself. I’ll even provide the link.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/r ... -18-allies
Free speech doesn’t count when you take part in a conspiracy. Conspirators need speech to hatch their plans, incest boy.
Can you point to one that doesn't?Beekeeper » 01 Sep 2023, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑ So you can point to the STATUTE that states the "criminal activity" that you allege is "election interference"?
*******.Squatchman » 01 Sep 2023, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ Can you point to one that doesn't?
It's called racketeering.
Ask the mafia how a RICO case works.
He's ****.