Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Hunter Bidens LAPTOP... the GIFT that JUST keeps on GIVING !
Hunter Bidens LAPTOP... the GIFT that JUST keeps on GIVING !
By ConservativeWave
1 Sep 2023 6:49 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
4 Sep 2023 10:27 am
"All over America"? I suppose you have a file somewhere that has all these biased quotes, or do we just take your word for it? Do you really think that GOP DAs and Judges do not occasionally show their bias? And if I had a file with politically biased comments from some random Republican prosecutors and judges all over America, would it cancel yours out?Majik » 04 Sep 2023, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ My opinion is based upon the very real and politically biased remarks of Democrat prosecutors and judges all over America .....
and you hold and show bias as a father of a deputy district attorney ...
And my deputy district attorney daughter - a registered Democrat - works for a Republican DA and campaigned for another Republican DA candidate in a neighboring district.
4 Sep 2023 10:31 am
wow. Jonathan Turley's opinion? Did Faux News bring that down in stone tablet form from the top of Mt. Sinai?Majik » 04 Sep 2023, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑ However, the argument for the Disqualifications Clause does not hold water, according to multiple legal experts.George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley says there "are good faith arguments in favor of this claim" but he views the theory as "not simply dubious but dangerous."
"The amendment was written to deal with those who engage in an actual rebellion causing hundreds of thousands of deaths," Turley said. "Advocates would extend the reference to ‘insurrection or rebellion’ to include unsupported claims and challenges involving election fraud."Turley said he has long criticized Trump's January 6 speech, but he views the violence at the Capitol that day as "a protest that became a riot." That definition would be crucial to applying the 14th Amendment, according to Turley, and Trump has not been found guilty of insurrection or incitement to rebellion."According to these advocates, Trump can be barred from the ballot without any charge, let alone a conviction, of insurrection or rebellion," Turley said.
Turley said the proponents "also argue that there is no action needed from Congress" and thus, "state and federal judges could just bar those who are deemed as supporting rebellion through their election challenges and claims."Heritage Foundation senior legal fellow Hans von Spakovsky told Fox News Digital that it is his opinion that there are no legal grounds to keep Trump off the ballot via the 14th Amendment.Von Spakovsky said that liberals were making the same argument against several conservatives prior to the 2022 midterm elections, citing the January 6 Riots."They were all unsuccessful," Von Spakovsky said. "And every discussion that I've seen of this ignores the fact nobody ever mentions that they talk about Section 3 of the 14th Amendment as if it currently exists."Von Spakovsky noted the two-thirds vote provision allowing Congress to "remove such a disability" under the Disqualifications Clause and argued that the legislature already has removed the clause.
"In 1872, they passed . . . the Amnesty Act, and it removed the Section three disqualification, with certain exceptions, including anybody who had served in two of the Congresses just before the Civil War, and members of the military, for example, who had been in the Union Army and had served the Confederacy," Von Spakovsky said."In 1898, Congress passed a second amnesty act that completely got rid of all of those exceptions," he added. "So the Disqualification Clause, it's gone. It's not valid anymore."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/attemp ... ts-experts
Do you not understand that for every one of YOUR legal experts, our side has a mirror image?
4 Sep 2023 10:57 am
That doesn't matter it has already failed in Arizona ....Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes said on a podcast this week that the state Supreme Court ruled "there’s no statutory process in federal law to enforce Section 3 of the 14th amendment" and that "you can't enforce it.""That’s what the Arizona Supreme Court said, so that’s the state of the law in Arizona. Now, do I agree with that? No, that’s stupid," Fontes said, noting that he would "follow the law" in Arizona, even though he disagrees with it.maineman » 04 Sep 2023, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ wow. Jonathan Turley's opinion? Did Faux News bring that down in stone tablet form from the top of Mt. Sinai?
Do you not understand that for every one of YOUR legal experts, our side has a mirror image?
and what will probably happen is if a state does try and keep Trump off the ballot the SCOTUS will strike it down and fairly quickly.....
no matter how many mirror images you have ....
4 Sep 2023 11:22 am
probably, eh? so now you're a bookie?Majik » 04 Sep 2023, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑ That doesn't matter it has already failed in Arizona ....Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes said on a podcast this week that the state Supreme Court ruled "there’s no statutory process in federal law to enforce Section 3 of the 14th amendment" and that "you can't enforce it.""That’s what the Arizona Supreme Court said, so that’s the state of the law in Arizona. Now, do I agree with that? No, that’s stupid," Fontes said, noting that he would "follow the law" in Arizona, even though he disagrees with it.
and what will probably happen is if a state does try and keep Trump off the ballot the SCOTUS will strike it down and fairly quickly.....
no matter how many mirror images you have ....
And I am not sure that the lack of a statutory process in FEDERAL law prevents individual states from upholding the 14th Amendment in their own jurisdictions.
And btw... any luck on that list of quotes from Democratic prosecutors and judges from across the country? I want to know how many matching quotes from Republican prosecutors and judges I am gonna have to find in my google search.
4 Sep 2023 11:23 am
This is the one you seem to have overlooked, @Majikmaineman » 04 Sep 2023, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑ "All over America"? I suppose you have a file somewhere that has all these biased quotes, or do we just take your word for it? Do you really think that GOP DAs and Judges do not occasionally show their bias? And if I had a file with politically biased comments from some random Republican prosecutors and judges all over America, would it cancel yours out?
And my deputy district attorney daughter - a registered Democrat - works for a Republican DA and campaigned for another Republican DA candidate in a neighboring district.
4 Sep 2023 11:45 am
Thank you for your admission that the U.S justice system is politically compromised by partisanship.....maineman » 04 Sep 2023, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ probably, eh? so now you're a bookie?
And I am not sure that the lack of a statutory process in FEDERAL law prevents individual states from upholding the 14th Amendment in their own jurisdictions.
And btw... any luck on that list of quotes from Democratic prosecutors and judges from across the country? I want to know how many matching quotes from Republican prosecutors and judges I am gonna have to find in my google search.
I knew you had it in you ....
4 Sep 2023 11:47 am
Majik » 04 Sep 2023, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ Thank you for your admission that the U.S justice system is politically compromised by partisanship.....
I knew you had it in you ....
4 Sep 2023 11:48 am
Again...
you just proved my point .....
that our justice system is broken by bias and political partisanship.....
which you unethically seem to think is OK when it is in your party's favor.....
4 Sep 2023 12:01 pm
How many ****** she thrown away, more than Kamel Harris?maineman » 04 Sep 2023, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑ "All over America"? I suppose you have a file somewhere that has all these biased quotes, or do we just take your word for it? Do you really think that GOP DAs and Judges do not occasionally show their bias? And if I had a file with politically biased comments from some random Republican prosecutors and judges all over America, would it cancel yours out?
And my deputy district attorney daughter - a registered Democrat - works for a Republican DA and campaigned for another Republican DA candidate in a neighboring district.
4 Sep 2023 12:04 pm
So, they didn't really teach you about sarcasm or facetiousness in the ESL class you took for your GED? I'd ask for my money back if I were you.Majik » 04 Sep 2023, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ Thank you for your admission that the U.S justice system is politically compromised by partisanship.....
I knew you had it in you ....
4 Sep 2023 12:11 pm
You attempting to deny your own words and chalk it up to sarcasm is hilarious ....maineman » 04 Sep 2023, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑ So, they didn't really teach you about sarcasm or facetiousness in the ESL class you took for your GED? I'd ask for my money back if I were you.
Especially when you yourself are a highly biased partisan ....
4 Sep 2023 12:25 pm
YOU claim to have this exhaustive list of biased quotes from liberal DAs and Judges. I threw up the **** flag. It is still lying there on the field of play.Majik » 04 Sep 2023, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑ You attempting to deny your own words and chalk it up to sarcasm is hilarious ....
Especially when you yourself are a highly biased partisan ....
I am actually a pretty moderate, hawkish democrat and the only issue I have really strong feelings about is the lack of qualifications of the clown.
4 Sep 2023 12:45 pm
maineman » 04 Sep 2023, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑ YOU claim to have this exhaustive list of biased quotes from liberal DAs and Judges. I threw up the **** flag. It is still lying there on the field of play.
I am actually a pretty moderate, hawkish democrat and the only issue I have really strong feelings about is the lack of qualifications of the clown.
mainestain has a lack of qualifications to judge anyone else.
Here's his qualifications...
4 Sep 2023 1:39 pm
whitler make you a promise you could suck her dick squatboi?Squatchman » 02 Sep 2023, 10:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Some states ,like Michigan are looking to exclude him on the ballots. No criminals allowed.
Can't vote for the **** if he isn't on the ballot can you?
And if I remember right Michigan is kind of important in getting the electoral votes needed.
Ain't Michigan and our dear Governor,Gretchen Whitmer great?
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA 
4 Sep 2023 1:40 pm
lol peacefully and patrioticallymaineman » 03 Sep 2023, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Glad you think so.
You're probably right, but I know that our SecState and AG are looking into it. Again... I would argue that Trump's speech at the ellipse certainly made the Proud Boys feel comfortable enough to attempt to overturn the election results.
4 Sep 2023 4:00 pm
fight like hell.
4 Sep 2023 6:01 pm
Did you EVER listen to Trumps Speech... HE said NOTHING Wrong, NOTHING inappropriate... HE only encouraged people to: "Protest and let their voices be heart"... NO DIFFERENT than people have protested in America, in accordance with their freedom of Speech RIGHTS, for over 200 years !!
ONLY NOW Democrats are deciding WHAT Americans can protest and WHAT they can NOT !! AND EVIDENTLY... protesting ANYTHNG that makes the Democrats or the Deep State nervous.. IS NOT PERMITTED !!
THAT will continue and get WORSE unless Democrats are SHOWN the DOOR...
IT IS TIME to SHOW Democrats the DOOR !!
4 Sep 2023 6:38 pm
vote em outConservativeWave » 04 Sep 2023, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Did you EVER listen to Trumps Speech... HE said NOTHING Wrong, NOTHING inappropriate... HE only encouraged people to: "Protest and let their voices be heart"... NO DIFFERENT than people have protested in America, in accordance with their freedom of Speech RIGHTS, for over 200 years !!
ONLY NOW Democrats are deciding WHAT Americans can protest and WHAT they can NOT !! AND EVIDENTLY... protesting ANYTHNG that makes the Democrats or the Deep State nervous.. IS NOT PERMITTED !!
THAT will continue and get WORSE unless Democrats are SHOWN the DOOR...
IT IS TIME to SHOW Democrats the DOOR !!
4 Sep 2023 6:42 pm
fight like hellConservativeWave » 04 Sep 2023, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Did you EVER listen to Trumps Speech... HE said NOTHING Wrong, NOTHING inappropriate... HE only encouraged people to: "Protest and let their voices be heart"... NO DIFFERENT than people have protested in America, in accordance with their freedom of Speech RIGHTS, for over 200 years !!
ONLY NOW Democrats are deciding WHAT Americans can protest and WHAT they can NOT !! AND EVIDENTLY... protesting ANYTHNG that makes the Democrats or the Deep State nervous.. IS NOT PERMITTED !!
THAT will continue and get WORSE unless Democrats are SHOWN the DOOR...
IT IS TIME to SHOW Democrats the DOOR !!
4 Sep 2023 9:22 pm
Poor mainbitch, can't even add.maineman » 04 Sep 2023, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑ If you can't put two and two together, that's not my problem.
Who is online
In total there are 4523 users online :: 15 registered, 18 bots, and 4490 guests
Registered users: Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, FOS, ConservativeWave, FJB, Beekeeper, jerra b, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, nefarious101, sole, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: Firefox/7.0, Adsbot, Bolt, DuckDuckGo, GPTBot, proximic, NING, DuckDuckBot, YandexBot, TTD-Content, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, curl/7, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, Googlebot