Liberal Forum

Z09 » 20 Sep 2023, 5:04 am » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 5:04 am

So...
It was the officers fault for stopping her ...

And if she drove away and killed a child it still would be the officers fault..

I think you kinda exposed yourself

yes and they say not to use guns when it is not safe.
 

RedheadedStranger » 20 Sep 2023, 5:54 am » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 5:54 am

To most leftists, the cops are basically in the wrong regardless, because they are cops.

People like jerra will never say that the pregnant woman shouldn't have been stealing the booze... but that the cops should have never tried to stop her for doing so in the first place.

The "progressive" mind says... "That pregnant woman was just minding her business and trying to be black, and those cops should have just let her be. She wasn't hurting anybody."

That's seriously how these people think.

no. it is about not doing it according to the rules-------

https://phillypolice.com/assets/directives/D10.1.pdf

C. Police Officers shall not use deadly force against another person, unless they have an objectively reasonable belief that they must protect themselves or another person from death or serious bodily injury. Further, an officer is not justified in using deadly force at any point in time when there is no longer an objectively reasonable belief that the suspect is dangerous, even if deadly force would have been justified at an earlier point in time. (PLEAC 1.3.2)

------------------------------

she was not a threat prior to the cop drawing the gun on her.
 

Z09 » 20 Sep 2023, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 11:34 am

The officer felt his life was threatened...

And the woman was told numerous times to step out of the car.
She refused and instead drove her car toward the officer.

She made a choice

he should not pointed a loaded gun at her in the first place. he endangered himself and others.

Z09 » 20 Sep 2023, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 12:31 pm

No...
That's BS...

Police that pull their guns out to defuse a situation or protect themselves....

The woman made a choice

he was not protecting himself when he drew a gun and stood in front of her car.

Z09 » 20 Sep 2023, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 12:21 pm

She should have NOT tried to run and kill a police officer holding a gun..

Why is it that every response from you blames the officer....?

And not the woman that refused to comply?

according to you a cop should not shoot a white woman even if she is breaking into a window of the US capitol among a throng of screaming frenzied insurrectionists.

why  is that?

especially if the cop is black.

Z09 » 20 Sep 2023, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 1:01 pm

???
I have no idea what you're discussing 
 
 Can you show us where I said the officer at the US Capitol did not have a right to defend himself?

Go ahead
I challenge you

ashly babbit

Z09 » 20 Sep 2023, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 1:01 pm

???
I have no idea what you're discussing 
 
 Can you show us where I said the officer at the US Capitol did not have a right to defend himself?

Go ahead
I challenge you

sure you did when your YELLOW MASTER urged all his supporters to complain a black cop shot an 'innocent' white woman.

jerrab » 20 Sep 2023, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 1:46 pm

sure you did when your YELLOW MASTER urged all his supporters to complain a black cop shot an 'innocent' white woman.

the **** nigga cop was a coward... shooting from behind a door

FJB » 20 Sep 2023, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 1:57 pm

the **** nigga cop was a coward... shooting from behind a door

trump ordered no metal detectors to be used so as far as the cop was concerned everyone had a gun.

jerrab » 20 Sep 2023, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 2:18 pm

trump ordered no metal detectors to be used so as far as the cop was concerned everyone had a gun.

THAT IS **** **** AND YOU KNOW IT ***

FJB » 20 Sep 2023, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 2:20 pm

THAT IS **** **** AND YOU KNOW IT ***

it is not. trump demanded no metal detectors to be used on 1-6

jerrab » 20 Sep 2023, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 2:25 pm

it is not. trump demanded no metal detectors to be used on 1-6

You are a bold face liar... the nigga cop deserves to hang

FJB » 20 Sep 2023, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 2:20 pm

THAT IS **** **** AND YOU KNOW IT ***

----------------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.courthousenews.com/jan-6-co ... -evidence/

WASHINGTON (CN) — President Trump was repeatedly warned about armed rallygoers on Jan. 6, and he responded by calling for the Secret Service to reduce security so he could have a larger audience for his speech that preceded the violent attack on the Capitol, lawmakers revealed Tuesday in a hurried meeting of the House select committee investigating the insurrection.Cassidy Hutchinson, who was the top aide to Trump’s chief of staff Mark Meadows, testified this afternoon that, during Trump's Jan. 6 rally at the Ellipse that devolved into a war zone, Trump was angry attendance was not at capacity. After being warned that Secret Service was denying entry to people who tried to pass through magnetometers armed with guns, bear spray, knives and brass knuckles, Trump delivered new instructions to those working the checkpoints.“I don’t effing care that they have weapons. They are not here to hurt me. Take the effing mags away. Let my people in. They can march to the Capitol from here," Trump said, according to Hutchinson.
 

Z09 » 20 Sep 2023, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 2:31 pm

Now you're lying

At no time did I say that officer couldn't defend himself 

Why don't you find my quote if so?

I am not going to dig back 3 years. however if you can show the post where you said the black cop was right to shoot ashly babbit and that trump was wrong to complain about it, go right ahead.
 

jerrab » 20 Sep 2023, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 2:25 pm

it is not. trump demanded no metal detectors to be used on 1-6

 Wrong! Trump has zero control over security. It is 100% decided by the secret service

Warcok » 20 Sep 2023, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 2:45 pm

 Wrong! Trump has zero control over security. It is 100% decided by the secret service

he was commander in chief at the time. he had the authority to tell them no metal detectors.

jerrab » 20 Sep 2023, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 2:30 pm

----------------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.courthousenews.com/jan-6-co ... -evidence/

WASHINGTON (CN) — President Trump was repeatedly warned about armed rallygoers on Jan. 6, and he responded by calling for the Secret Service to reduce security so he could have a larger audience for his speech that preceded the violent attack on the Capitol, lawmakers revealed Tuesday in a hurried meeting of the House select committee investigating the insurrection.Cassidy Hutchinson, who was the top aide to Trump’s chief of staff Mark Meadows, testified this afternoon that, during Trump's Jan. 6 rally at the Ellipse that devolved into a war zone, Trump was angry attendance was not at capacity. After being warned that Secret Service was denying entry to people who tried to pass through magnetometers armed with guns, bear spray, knives and brass knuckles, Trump delivered new instructions to those working the checkpoints.“I don’t effing care that they have weapons. They are not here to hurt me. Take the effing mags away. Let my people in. They can march to the Capitol from here," Trump said, according to Hutchinson.

**** **** FACE PELOSI IS IN CHARGE OT THAT BITCH
 

jerrab » 20 Sep 2023, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 2:52 pm

he was commander in chief at the time. he had the authority to tell them no metal detectors.

 No, he has no authority over the secret service and how they conduct security. And he's the commander in chief of the military, not the secret service.

Ur dum

Z09 » 20 Sep 2023, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2023, 2:57 pm

So I have to look for something I never said to prove you lied?

Christ

you have to look to prove you didn't lie.

so you can't--  you lied.