Squatchman » 01 Sep 2023, 9:36 pm » wrote: ↑ But when Ashli Babbit didn't comply you defend her.
. Why is that?
neueregel » 19 Sep 2023, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ Did the media outlet edit the front?... because we know they edited the end. I don't know either way.
RedheadedStranger » 19 Sep 2023, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑ Did you not imply that the woman had the right to drive away because the cop was rude?
If that wasn't what you were implying, then what was it?
RedheadedStranger » 19 Sep 2023, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑ Did you not imply that the woman had the right to drive away because the cop was rude?
If that wasn't what you were implying, then what was it?
So now it's "maybe they knew somehow"?jerrab » 19 Sep 2023, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑ the officer who shot her was arm's length away, giving him enough time to shoot. they wanted her to drive so they could shoot her.
maybe they knew somehow. if they did that will come out.
https://youtu.be/lGxmwduuoug?si=pa8QrG5-XxDwr1Bv
neueregel » 19 Sep 2023, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ Did the media outlet edit the front?... because we know they edited the end. I don't know either way.
So does that mean that the criminal doesn't need to follow the cop's instruction?
at 120 or so the the second cop gives the first officer a special pat. like I got this.RedheadedStranger » 19 Sep 2023, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑ So now it's "maybe they knew somehow"?
That is a far cry from plotting to kill her on the way to the scene.
How about it was a case of the cop figured the lady wasn't insane enough to try and run him over if he stood in front of her car, and was wrong?
That sounds like a more logical scenario.
Zeets2 » 19 Sep 2023, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ So does that mean that the criminal doesn't need to follow the cop's instruction?
Rudeness? Is that really your "defense" for a wealthy woman stealing booze?
Tell the truth! Would you give two **** if it wasn't a black woman?
Because I sure wouldn't give a **** if the same cop shot a white woman for shoplifting and the attempted murder of a cop!
Guess I'm simply not the racist YOU are, huh?
jerrab » 19 Sep 2023, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ out of the car. out of the car.
he was as rude as he could be, he did not want her to get out he wanted her to stay in so they could have a REASON to kill her.
A special pat?jerrab » 19 Sep 2023, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ at 120 or so the the second cop gives the first officer a special pat. like I got this.
https://youtu.be/qPNX4aWOim4?si=2A1uB0hBm5uteOBv
Skans » 19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑ The moral of the story - don't steal. And if you make the poor choice to steal, don't fight the cops when you get caught. And, if you think you can disobey the cops when they catch you committing a crime, BANG BANG, you're dead.
Stop sympathizing with those who commit crimes. Criminals get what criminals deserve. End Of Story.
The she-boon played right into his hands, then.jerrab » 19 Sep 2023, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ out of the car. out of the car.
he was as rude as he could be, he did not want her to get out he wanted her to stay in so they could have a REASON to kill her.
with no apparent communication between the 2 cops the second cop went right to the front of the car. why?RedheadedStranger » 19 Sep 2023, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ A special pat?
That must have been the "I'm about to blast this pregnant *** so I can be famous" pat.
Damn you have a vivid imagination... almost as vivid as Bruce's.
jerrab » 19 Sep 2023, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑ they wanted to scare and confuse her. the gun was ready to shoot the second she stepped on the gas.
And she was dead from the third minute.
So why are you afraid to answer the question then?
It was obviously a conspiracy to kill a pregnant *** so they could get famous.jerrab » 19 Sep 2023, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ with no apparent communication between the 2 cops the second cop went right to the front of the car. why?
Sharpton and Crump once again sent their own handpicked Negro Coroner in to investigate.