impartialobserver » 06 Sep 2023, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I am not taking about him.. so not sure what you are going on about.
I would add one more bullet point....if you vote Democrat, you support child grooming.Vegas » 06 Sep 2023, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ You are a child groomer and sexual predator if you defend even one of the following:And yes, it really is this simple.
- Grown men using girl's locker rooms, especially when little girls are changing or showering.
- genital mutilation on children.
- Drag queens interacting and reading to children.
- Get pissed at Republican leaders for wanting to remove books about oral sex in elementary and middle school libraries.
If you follow our discussion.. I first posted unconnected to any other (look below) and vegas replied to me.LincolnNebraska » 06 Sep 2023, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, you replied to Vegas, who was discussing ***.
RebelGator » 06 Sep 2023, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑ He never takes a stand on anything, maybe the author was trying to force his hand......without success, I might add.
impartialobserver » 06 Sep 2023, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑ If you follow our discussion.. I first posted unconnected to any other (look below) and vegas replied to me.
The pedophile that I know intimately (enough said) would fool all of you on here. He looks like the Jax Teller character on Sons of Anarchy and acts like someone you would see on the show, "Dukes of Hazzard".
LincolnNebraska » 06 Sep 2023, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, Vegas discussed ***, and you replied by using the word "he."
Pastafarian » 06 Sep 2023, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope, I never have. My children are perfectly in tact.
they are not cutting off ducks of three year olds. So strawman much.
I don’t get what you find offensive about reading to children. Are you offended that the person is fully clothed? Do you read to children naked, you sick degenerate.
yes that is exactly what sex Ed is. The more you know the more you can fight back against you sick degenerate pedophiles.
Who do you presume to be? God? Might I suggest that in discussing topics such as these you exhibit a little more grace and humility, and refrain from preaching that which you surely do not know.Nostradamus'omh » 06 Sep 2023, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Satan is a caricature of human intellectual suggestion
****. You admitted to:
Fuelman » 06 Sep 2023, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Just curious, which one of those did @impartialobserver support to get that label under his avatar?
Seems about 180 out of character, he may be the only sane member here!
No.LincolnNebraska » 06 Sep 2023, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ That's a haunting one. Can you forgive yourself because you were only 16?
Nope.Vegas » 06 Sep 2023, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑ ****. You admitted to:You admitted to this, thus you admitted to being a pedo. Same thing.
- Drag queens sexualizing children
- Teaching elementary kids how to have oral sex
- Defend parents in mutilating their child's genitals
- And we both know that you are okay with men entering women's locker rooms watching children change.
Sex Ed is about information. And with pedophiles like you out there kids need all the information they can get.Vegas » 06 Sep 2023, 4:25 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. Yep. You do.
2. Not the point retard. The point is that you would defend parents who want this.
3. LOL! Deflecting away from the drag part intentionally. We both know why.![]()
![]()
4. Sex ed is about reproduction. No different than learning how animals and insects reproduce. It's not about oral sex you pedo. Kids have no business learning that kind of ****. Leave it to the parents. The school educates, they are not supposed to court kids into sex acts, especially through fiction books, you **** sick son of a bitch.
Information about the reproduction system. Seriously, do you really not see a problem with 3rd graders learning about oral sex? You disgusting asshole.Pastafarian » 06 Sep 2023, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Sex Ed is about information. And with pedophiles like you out there kids need all the information they can get.
Yep.
Are you really dense enough not to realize the Sex Ed they're teaching in schools is not about reproduction, it's about gender fluidity and sexual transitioning?Pastafarian » 06 Sep 2023, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Sex Ed is about information. And with pedophiles like you out there kids need all the information they can get.
You really are over compensating, you childless masturbator of other people’s children.
In my case.. when I attempted to come forward years later, they told me to toughen up and that bad things happen. As for him, they knew of his terrible acts and still let him in the house since then. Not going to lie.. I had some serious resentment for years to come. I came forward because I did not want him to do it to his newborn son. Well, I got hushed and he continued his heinous ways. The mother wisened up and disappeared one day.Skans » 06 Sep 2023, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ No.
Actually, I still don't know what would have been right. The pervert baby-sitter was in the past. If I thought the pervert still had access to the children, I like to think that I would have told the parents. So, whatever he had the 2 kids do, which I will not repeat here, it was in the past. Here's what I remember going through my mind:I can't recall whether I discussed this with my own parents at the time. I think I did, but I just don't remember.
- Would it have just hurt the kids more by getting the parents all worked up about something that happened to them in the past? The two kids didn't seem to be concerned about it at all.
- I also worried about how I would be perceived if I repeated to the parents what the 2 kids told me. I mean, how does a 16 year old boy tell the parents of 2 young kids (whom I hardly knew) the sick **** the pervert had them do? It was shocking and unbelievable to me.
- On the other hand, those two kids probably needed some serious counseling, and did I deprive them of that by remaining silent?
I’m sorry to hear of your pain.impartialobserver » 06 Sep 2023, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑ In my case.. when I attempted to come forward years later, they told me to toughen up and that bad things happen. As for him, they knew of his terrible acts and still let him in the house since then. Not going to lie.. I had some serious resentment for years to come. I came forward because I did not want him to do it to his newborn son. Well, I got hushed and he continued his heinous ways. The mother wisened up and disappeared one day.
That’s quite the burden on a 16 year old’s shoulders. Never mind the agony of the children he abused. I’m sorry to hear this.Skans » 06 Sep 2023, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ No.
Actually, I still don't know what would have been right. The pervert baby-sitter was in the past. If I thought the pervert still had access to the children, I like to think that I would have told the parents. So, whatever he had the 2 kids do, which I will not repeat here, it was in the past. Here's what I remember going through my mind:I can't recall whether I discussed this with my own parents at the time. I think I did, but I just don't remember.
- Would it have just hurt the kids more by getting the parents all worked up about something that happened to them in the past? The two kids didn't seem to be concerned about it at all.
- I also worried about how I would be perceived if I repeated to the parents what the 2 kids told me. I mean, how does a 16 year old boy tell the parents of 2 young kids (whom I hardly knew) the sick **** the pervert had them do? It was shocking and unbelievable to me.
- On the other hand, those two kids probably needed some serious counseling, and did I deprive them of that by remaining silent?