Groomer^
He does not.Vegas » 06 Sep 2023, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Information about the reproduction system. Seriously, do you really not see a problem with 3rd graders learning about oral sex? You disgusting asshole.
In no way does the existence of conventional pedophiles justify a political party defending grooming and pedophilia.impartialobserver » 06 Sep 2023, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑ It took time for sure. It was 36 years ago and so time does mostly heal the wounds. Anyways, my point in bringing it up is that pedophiles are not so easily pigeonholed. If any of these folks on the forum met my rapist in real life.. they would by default say he is an upstanding man. They would see his rough exterior, cowboy attire, etc. and think that is working class Joe
Groomers and pronouns - always gonna cause confusion.LincolnNebraska » 06 Sep 2023, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Then say so. I find communication is lost when people substitute too many nouns for pronouns.
Sex Ed informs children about the disgusting **** pedophiles like you will perform on them or you have them perform on you. I understand why you want to keep children in the dark.Cannonpointer » 06 Sep 2023, 11:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Groomer^
The groomer was SPECIFICALLY asked about prepubescent children being exposed to books about blowjobs, and he refers to this as "sex education."
That is EXACTLY what pedophiles say when they get caught - I was just trying to teach him/her. It's always about "educating," not sexualizing and perving.
People that adopt call the children they adopted their children. Teachers without children call their students, their children. People role playing a career ignoring now is eternity call anyone of their faith, their chosen people willingly dying to show their devotion to ignoring life in real time as genetically occupying space one of a kind, now.Lincoln Nebraska » 06 Sep 2023, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ You don't have kids. You are thee biggest liar I've ever met on a forum.
Look at you cast doubt on me, again. I describe all I ever was since conceived. One evolving male adapting in space mutually timed apart as ancestrally present here geometrically, geologically, geographically, ancestrally present as is any reproduction living specifically here. Past, current, any generation forward.Skans » 06 Sep 2023, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Who do you presume to be? God? Might I suggest that in discussing topics such as these you exhibit a little more grace and humility, and refrain from preaching that which you surely do not know.
no shifting.Cannonpointer » 06 Sep 2023, 11:18 pm » wrote: ↑ In no way does the existence of conventional pedophiles justify a political party defending grooming and pedophilia.
I notice all the groomers want to shift the topic.
Look at you directing conversations forward. You might command language, but you aren't navigating time honestly.Pastafarian » 07 Sep 2023, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑ no shifting.
Republicans are the one pushing for child marriages. Conservatives also don’t find it that big a deal when an underage boy is molested by a woman, calling the boy lucky and all that jizz pedophiles spew.
So, the take-away is that parents/adults tend to already know what happened, but will resist any interference which tends NOT to ignore what happened.impartialobserver » 06 Sep 2023, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑ In my case.. when I attempted to come forward years later, they told me to toughen up and that bad things happen. As for him, they knew of his terrible acts and still let him in the house since then. Not going to lie.. I had some serious resentment for years to come. I came forward because I did not want him to do it to his newborn son. Well, I got hushed and he continued his heinous ways. The mother wisened up and disappeared one day.
Like I commented to Impartialobserver, it seems the take-away is that parents/adults tend to already know what happened, but will resist any interference which tends NOT to ignore what happened. This seems to be a trend. So, if I had reported this to the two parents directly, in vivid detail, I can only imagine what they might have done in retaliation to me. Still, I don't want to rely on that as an excuse for not saying anything.ROG62 » 06 Sep 2023, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑ My mother-in-law was sexually abused by her stepfather and brother at the age of 7. She told her mother who replied, "don't you tell this to anyone! You'll ruin this family!!!"
**** her up big time...
Or, are they? Are the sickos living in the shadows defended by a political party?
the victims probably didn't feel shame as they may have thought the behavior was normal depending upon age and awareness...with my MIL, it didn't rear its ugly head until she was in her 50's...word is the vics stop maturing at the age of abuse, which I believe holds true as I've seen certain things my MIL does that confirms it...Skans » 07 Sep 2023, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑ Like I commented to Impartialobserver, it seems the take-away is that parents/adults tend to already know what happened, but will resist any interference which tends NOT to ignore what happened. This seems to be a trend. So, if I had reported this to the two parents directly, in vivid detail, I can only imagine what they might have done in retaliation to me. Still, I don't want to rely on that as an excuse for not saying anything.
I'll tell you what else kept going through my mind. At first, I had to believe that the parents already knew about what happened. The kids talked about it as if there was no shame in it. But, if the parents knew, then why did the kids talk about it like there was no shame in it?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom that’s why sex Ed for children is so important. So they can recognize abuse when it is happening.ROG62 » 07 Sep 2023, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ the victims probably didn't feel shame as they may have thought the behavior was normal depending upon age and awareness...with my MIL, it didn't rear its ugly head until she was in her 50's...word is the vics stop maturing at the age of abuse, which I believe holds true as I've seen certain things my MIL does that confirms it...
Vegas » 06 Sep 2023, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ You are a child groomer and sexual predator if you defend even one of the following:And yes, it really is this simple.
- Grown men using girl's locker rooms, especially when little girls are changing or showering.
- genital mutilation on children.
- Drag queens interacting and reading to children.
- Get pissed at Republican leaders for wanting to remove books about oral sex in elementary and middle school libraries.
so teaching a 5yo about oral sex is the only way to get the point across? whatever happened to the 'inappropriate touching' angle?Pastafarian » 07 Sep 2023, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑ that’s why sex Ed for children is so important. So they can recognize abuse when it is happening.
Only pedophiles like @Vegas and @Cannonpointer as well as a few other posters here would want to keep children in the dark about what they would do to them.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom They aren’t teaching 5 yo blowjobs. But they are teaching it to 10 yo.ROG62 » 07 Sep 2023, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ so teaching a 5yo about oral sex is the only way to get the point across? whatever happened to the 'inappropriate touching' angle?
You haven’t said you disapprove, closeted pedophile.
Didn’t you just state that the abused children you know of probably don’t know what happened to them? Pretty sure you wrote this.ROG62 » 07 Sep 2023, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ so teaching a 5yo about oral sex is the only way to get the point across? whatever happened to the 'inappropriate touching' angle?