I'm pretty sure Donald Trump would be considered a "neo-liberal"... much to the chagrin of the progressive leftards.
Who's idea is that, snipper?impartialobserver » 11 Sep 2023, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑ in the most academic of terms... the fundamental difference between liberals and conservatives in economics is importance of externalities. It is not just the bleeding heart. The idea is that imperfection (poverty, inequality) impact things beyond just the person but society as a whole.
RebelGator » 11 Sep 2023, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Who's idea is that, snipper?
You gonna change the nature of humans after it's been perfected for thousands of years?
That appears to give a massive advantage to the elitesRedheadedStranger » 11 Sep 2023, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm pretty sure Donald Trump would be considered a "neo-liberal"... much to the chagrin of the progressive leftards.
From Wikipedia...
Neoliberalism is contemporarily used to refer to market-oriented reform policies such as "eliminating price controls, deregulating capital markets, lowering trade barriers" and reducing, especially through privatization and austerity, state influence in the economy.
mg:
You're a strange fellow, on one hand you espouse the liberal doctrine, but fall short of a full commitment when the rubber meets the road. Don't talk libtard to me unless you're gonna go all out, like Dylan. When you get a boob job, you'll make a believer out of me.impartialobserver » 11 Sep 2023, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't shoot the messenger. But I know that you do not have the intellect to separate explanation and support. I can explain that 4 + 4 = 8 but according to you.. that must mean that I have something about 4 or some other nonsense.
And you... well i am amazed that you figure out how to get out of bed. On forums, you portray yourself as a simpleton with an IQ of maybe 20. It is not a Conservative thing.. Skans, ROG62, Spartan.. all can express themselves clearly and recognize nuance.RebelGator » 11 Sep 2023, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑ You're a strange fellow, on one hand you espouse the liberal doctrine, but fall short of a full commitment when the rubber meets the road. Don't talk libtard to me unless you're gonna go all out, like Dylan. When you get a boob job, you'll make a believer out of me.
LOL.impartialobserver » 11 Sep 2023, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑ in the most academic of terms... the fundamental difference between liberals and conservatives in economics is importance of externalities. It is not just the bleeding heart. The idea is that imperfection (poverty, inequality) impact things beyond just the person but society as a whole.
Sumela » 11 Sep 2023, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑ LOL.
Neoliberalism has little to do with the left/right paradigm of politics.
Its an economic term. You just sort of showed you are not very educated
You're all over the place, rover......the only constant is your condescending **** and the inflated value of your self worth.impartialobserver » 11 Sep 2023, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑ And you... well i am amazed that you figure out how to get out of bed. On forums, you portray yourself as a simpleton with an IQ of maybe 20. It is not a Conservative thing.. Skans, ROG62, Spartan.. all can express themselves clearly and recognize nuance.
Redhead gave the actual academic version. Although itsimpartialobserver » 11 Sep 2023, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Again.. I gave you the academic version. Take it or leave it.
and biased!?Sumela » 11 Sep 2023, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑ That appears to give a massive advantage to the elites
to exploit the economy. Why would we trust the elites
so much to act appropriately? We talk here everyday
how the globalists cannot be trusted. Plus Id be inclined
to believe a Wikipedia definition is maybe a bit too innocent.
roadkill » 11 Sep 2023, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑ NeoLiberal Economics? I can define it...it means we're broke. lol
Broke and in debt. Debt is crucial to the transfer of wealth to the top.Biden's war on our gasoline based economy has made it more difficult than ever in our history to be able to OWN LOCK, STOCK AND BARREL a nice home on a decent sized lot.

Sumela » 11 Sep 2023, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑Broke and in debt. Debt is crucial to the transfer of wealth to the top.
And in foreign policy they keep poor countries with resources....poor by
keeping them in massive debt and paying off their leaders/elites. This
ensures the resources can be exploited.
Ignore the NeoLiberal adjectives and get to the root noun open for debate. What is the express reason economics exists in any social setting serving humanity's promises of better tomorrows each rotation of the planet if everyone complies with power of suggesting life isn't being eternally separated genetically populating the species currently alive one at a time arriving in specific series parallel space.