guilty of what?ConservativeWave » 13 Sep 2023, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑ I think MOST of America ALREADY has their suspicions about Joe Biden... AND, I don't think that the FACTS, EVIDENCE, and WITNESSES, that Republicans have already identified, and verified... once it's presented: 1) UNDER OATH, 2) IN PUBLIC, and 3) As PART of the OFFICIAL RECORD... will lessen those suspicions.
As a matter of fact... I think MOST Americans who CARE about the TRUTH... will be CONVINCED that Joe Bide IS GUILTY... and THEN, when a majority if Democrats vote AGAINST IMPEACHMENT... their credibility will be SHOT !
I REALLY think Democrats are in a WORLD of HURT !! I don't see ANYTHING that they can do to help themselves... MAYBE attacking Donald Trump with QUESTIONABLE Indictments and charges... BUT, we all see how THAT has worked out !!
Guilty of:
Should also start another one: Willful violating citizens rights. Treasonous.ConservativeWave » 12 Sep 2023, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑ McCarthy Endorses Impeachment Inquiry Against Biden...
U.S. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said Tuesday he will endorse an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden. The move will help Republicans gain access to Biden and his son Hunter Biden’s financial documents and bank records. The allegations “paint a picture of a culture of corruption” McCarthy said, adding that GOP-led investigations have revealed that Biden allegedly lied to the public about his knowledge of his family’s foreign business dealings. “This logical next step will give our committees the full power to gather all the facts and answers for the American public,”
ABOUT TIME !
https://americasnewsdesk.com/2023/09/12 ... nst-biden/
https://www.semafor.com/article/09/12/2 ... nt-inquiry
There is a plethora of evidence including multiple witnesses to start an inquiry.razoo » 13 Sep 2023, 5:32 am » wrote: ↑ As I stated there is zero evidence which is necessary to begin an inquiry
what evidence is there of these 5 charges of guilt you list?ConservativeWave » 13 Sep 2023, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ Guilty of:
1) Corruption,
2) Extortion,
3) Influence Peddling,
4) Abuse of Power,
5) Obstruction of Justice..
To name a few...
ALL of which, coupled with the evidence of: 1) Joe's involvement in Hunters influence peddling racquet, 2) Bank records showing MILLIONS of $$$ changing hands, and for WHAT? 3) Telephone calls with MANY of the seedy players Hunter was working with, and the Coup-de-Gras... 4) Joe Biden pretty much ADMITTING in a video, his involvement in what we know now was the QUASHING of the Buresma Holdings investigation by Ukraine (which both Hunter and Joe were taking money from), using a BILLION $$ U.S. aid package hostage as a threat (EXTORTION by ANY Definition)...
GUILTY of THAT !!
https://youtu.be/UXA--dj2-CY
LOOKS GOOD ON PAPER BUT ALSO LAYS OUT THE CORRUPTION SCANDALS OF THE BIDEN FAMILY TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.Neo » 12 Sep 2023, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Waste of time. Even if convicted in the house the democrats own the senate. Will just refuse to remove like they did with Trump. I welcome the investigation but see it as a futile waste of resources.
plugs is innocent until proven guiltymaineman » 13 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑ This is an investigation in search of a crime. We should just get in the practice of opening an impeachment investigation on every new incoming President just so, just maybe, we might find evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors somewhere.
great article:
McCarthy laid out the evidence to justify an inquiry earlier today.maineman » 13 Sep 2023, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑ great article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/12/opin ... arthy.html
You've been supporting that type of investigation for the past 7 years, FLOB.maineman » 13 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑ This is an investigation in search of a crime. We should just get in the practice of opening an impeachment investigation on every new incoming President just so, just maybe, we might find evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors somewhere.
You really have the unmitigated gall to post that?maineman » 13 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑ This is an investigation in search of a crime. We should just get in the practice of opening an impeachment investigation on every new incoming President just so, just maybe, we might find evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors somewhere.
zero evidence... only allegations in search of evidence.neueregel » 13 Sep 2023, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ McCarthy laid out the evidence to justify an inquiry earlier today.
That’s how it usually works. Someone makes an allegation and an investigation is needed to ascertain the veracity of the allegations. We have several whistleblowers that have made allegations.
have to have account to read wtf cmon manmaineman » 13 Sep 2023, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑ great article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/12/opin ... arthy.html
go for it. I LOVE it when Republicans start stupid impeachment investigations against sitting Democratic presidents.neueregel » 13 Sep 2023, 6:00 pm » wrote: ↑ That’s how it usually works. Someone makes an allegation and an investigation is needed to ascertain the veracity of the allegations. We have several whistleblowers that have made allegations.
Difference between Biden and Trump is Biden is actually guilty.maineman » 13 Sep 2023, 6:55 pm » wrote: ↑ go for it. I LOVE it when Republicans start stupid impeachment investigations against sitting Democratic presidents.
1) Witnesses (among them, ex partners of Hunter who have testified that Mr BIG was Joe Biden) !BuckNaked » 13 Sep 2023, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ what evidence is there of these 5 charges of guilt you list?
sez the guy without any evidence.Neo » 13 Sep 2023, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Difference between Biden and Trump is Biden is actually guilty.