Liberal Forum

Squatchman » 15 Sep 2023, 3:47 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 3:47 am

^^^^^^^ triggered again^^^^^^^^^^^^
  So the testimony against Trump from the people involved isn't evidence but this is?
 Looks like my work is done here.
 And as usual it was easy.

So getting your *** KICKED AGAIN AND AGAIN, which is CHILD'S PLAY for anyone that's involved, means "you win"??

Fact is, you can't point to ONE SINGLE PIECE OF TESTIMONY against Trump from "people involved"!! So PRODUCE THE LINKS to the "testimony"!!

Oh, that's right, you don't have any.

NOW, your *** IS KICKED and you can RUN like you always do, squatty!!

Squatchman » 15 Sep 2023, 3:47 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2023, 3:47 am

^^^^^^^ triggered again^^^^^^^^^^^^
  So the testimony against Trump from the people involved isn't evidence but this is?
 Looks like my work is done here.
 And as usual it was easy.

Found those LINKS to all this "testimony" against Trump yet???

Sorry for your *** GETTING KICKED BY YOUR OWN MOUTH, *******!!


 

Neo » 14 Sep 2023, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2023, 10:27 am

Democrats set the precedent for the amount of evidence needed for an impeachment inquiry or special counsel investigation. The Republicans skipped the steps of buying false information from a foreign spy agency and lying to a fisa court. They are already starting above the baseline of **** established by democrats in the shameful Mueller probe and the impeachment attempts. 
 

Why does your reality work like kindergarten semantics of everyone else does it too?