****!!
Mr. Kelly dibbsed the elliptical hypothetical before the purge.Beekeeper » 25 Sep 2023, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ ****!!
You never once said "hypothetically" on ANYTHING
You even replied to it CletusBeekeeper » 25 Sep 2023, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ ****!!
You never once said "hypothetically" on ANYTHING and now you want to try to blow THIS smoke up everyone's ***??
YOU GOT BUSTED and like every good little LIBTURD, you find an excuse for being a **** MORON!!
You're PROVING your stupid in DUMP TRUCKS full.Mrkelly » 25 Sep 2023, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ You even replied to it Cletus
viewtopic.php?p=2390694#p2390694
"I don’t know how it works for sure
but I was wondering if congress voted no on the funding of an executive order
and the president vetoed that decision
can they overturn his veto by a 2/3 vote in both houses?
from what little I looked, it seems that they could "
****!!!!!Mrkelly » 25 Sep 2023, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ You even replied to it Cletus
viewtopic.php?p=2390694#p2390694
"I don’t know how it works for sure
but I was wondering if congress voted no on the funding of an executive order
and the president vetoed that decision
can they overturn his veto by a 2/3 vote in both houses?
from what little I looked, it seems that they could "
I’m done with this circle conversationBeekeeper » 25 Sep 2023, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ You're PROVING your stupid in DUMP TRUCKS full.
When CONGRESS votes "NO" on funding, that means they VOTED DOWN ANY BILL that would have funded it. And that means, there is NO BILL sent to the President FOR his/her veto. You can't VETO something that doesn't exist, ****!!
You mean you are done getting your ******* KICKED with more of your utter imaginary stupidity.
whatever makes you feel good CletusBeekeeper » 25 Sep 2023, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ You mean you are done getting your ******* KICKED with more of your utter imaginary stupidity.
What you are saying is always a fraction of everything happening at the same time. Past ends now, evolving currently taking place individually as a whole universe occupying space uniquely displaced, future always developing forward here as ever changing into new total sum ending now.
You might like this. Maybe already seen it.
NO!
Mrkelly » 18 Sep 2023, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑2019
I know they stopped him when they had the power
now show where they stopped the wall in 2016-2017 when tRump had both houses
They can be funded when you have the votes, instead of defunded when you don't.GHETTOBLASTER » 18 Sep 2023, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑ You look so stupid.
So badly brainwashed.
So wrong on every count.
Proving you wrong takes so little effort...its like shooting fish in a barrel
The wall construction to replace the chicken wire fence that Obama had thrown up had to be started completely from scratch.
The design hadn't even been started and of course not DoD approved by the time Trump was elected.
I shouldn't expect a clueless, skill less or witless Libtard to understand that Federal projects take much more time to come to fruition than in your civilian world.
This trump guy sounds impotent. Is he related to reagan, who was FORCED to raise taxes by tip o'neill?Beekeeper » 18 Sep 2023, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ Same thing. Dems were going to FILIBUSTER any bill and Trump tried to negotiate with them, but once AGAIN, Schumer was his typical PARTY LOYALIST and blocked it from ever becoming a bill.
Suck on that one BOY!!
You just don't get it.Mrkelly » 18 Sep 2023, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ Giving tRump cover for being the phony he is
what about executive orders?
where did they stop tRump in 16 or 17 from doing that?
I would think they could at least FUND the **** thing while they had the votes - instead of waiting until they didn't and then hiding behind the democrats, giving their constituents an EXCUSE and a SCAPEGOAT instead of a **** WALL.GHETTOBLASTER » 18 Sep 2023, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ One figure I've heard is 83 miles of wall finally got erected.
I've seen that much interstate freeway wall take much longer to build.
You have no clue what the border wall looks like below grade either..but here you are pretending to know all about how easy it should have been to build the whole wall in just the first 2 years Trump was in office.
Mainly because [[[RACHEL]]] told you to think that.
So, when they had the house, why didn't they fund the wall?Beekeeper » 18 Sep 2023, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ IN case you failed to read the Constitution, ALL spending originates in the House of Representatives.
You're acting like Trump is smart - like the results he produced are the results he wanted.Mrkelly » 18 Sep 2023, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑
and tRump did have an executive order to build the wall, and it failed ... Executive Order 13767
he waited to issue it so the Dems could be blamed for stopping it
if he had done it at the beginning, he could have done it
but he just wasn't really into it
he just wanted a show
Like tomorrow, each rotation of the planet.Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑ :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
It's almost like someone somewhere is playing some kind of shell game - and stupid people just cannot figure out that the pea isn't under ANY of the shells, and never was.
I posted that a while backSumela » 25 Sep 2023, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ You might like this. Maybe already seen it.
Hedges and Kucinich - 9 mos ago.
https://youtu.be/b079rbpYIzU