Beekeeper » 18 Sep 2023, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Psssst. *******.
Controlling the Senate means you have 60 votes to effect CLOTURE. When a Senator decides he won't vote for it, he can FILIBUSTER any bill out there. So there was NOT 60 Republicans at the time, ASSWIPE!! And Schumer said he would FILIBUSTER any spending on the wall.
You are really dense as it gets.
Perhaps - to control our border - republicans could have played a bit of hardball?On November 21, 2013, Senate Democrats used the nuclear option, voting 48–52 to overrule a decision of the chair and set the cloture threshold for all nominations, other than those to the Supreme Court of the United States, at a simple majority of senators present and voting.
and warm and fuzzyCannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑ You're acting like Trump is smart - like the results he produced are the results he wanted.
Their argument is that Trump is stupid and impotent.
Wouldn't it just be easier to grant their argument that their hero is stupid and impotent?
I mean, okay - it would be inaccurate. But it would make them feel cozy. Ya want 'em to feel cozy, doncha?
Now that I have read the back story to this question, I see that I missed the point in our earlier exchange.Mrkelly » 18 Sep 2023, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑ When tRump signed his wall executive order
if the senate voted it down
Couldn’t he veto that decision
and force them to overturn his veto with a 2/3 vote?
83 miles doesn't impress you...!Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I would think they could at least FUND the **** thing while they had the votes - instead of waiting until they didn't and then hiding behind the democrats, giving their constituents an EXCUSE and a SCAPEGOAT instead of a **** WALL.
But that's just me... I rarely let people hide behind stupid when their actions are evil. I assume the results smart people PRODUCE are the results smart people WANT.
You must not know, huh?? It takes BOTH Houses to fund anything and Schumer was his USUAL partisan ASSHOLE and wanting OPEN BORDERS as these assholes have wanted for decades now.Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑ So, when they had the house, why didn't they fund the wall?
I took particular note of this part:By Gopal Ratnam
Posted March 28, 2017 at 2:10pm
Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer on Tuesday said Democrats will block President Donald Trump’s budget proposals on expanding federal immigration forces and starting the border wall project.
“Senate Democrats are prepared to fight this all the way,” the New York Democrat said at an event organized by the National Council of La Raza, the country’s largest Hispanic civil rights advocacy group. “Instead of spending taxpayer dollars on a pointless wall, we should be investing in creating jobs and fixing our infrastructure.”
The Trump administration’s budget proposals ask for $4.5 billion in fiscal 2018 and another $3 billion in the fiscal 2017 supplemental request to pay for a border wall and hire more immigration and border patrol agents. The Department of Homeland Security has already begun seeking bids for the first phase of the wall along the southwest border with Mexico, estimated at about $600 million.
Sure wish republicans had that kind of fighting spirit - we might have ourselves a wall.“Senate Democrats are prepared to fight this all the way,” the New York Democrat said at an event organized by the National Council of La Raza
Trump doesn't control the House or Senate. Are you as DUMB as kelly??Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑ This trump guy sounds impotent. Is he related to reagan, who was FORCED to raise taxes by tip o'neill?
The president doesn't run the house and the senate?Beekeeper » 25 Sep 2023, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump doesn't control the House or Senate. Are you as DUMB as kelly??
voice of experience projecting your behavior on everyone else. it is what you would do if you were them, correct? You like pretending to be the star in charge of a we mantra.
I'm not the one that worships tRump
But you do worship metaphors, maybes, and make believe now isn't eternity where genetics cannot be eternally separate in ancestral order of arriving forward now uniquely here, spontaneously alive, evolving one at a time simultaneously present in ever changing form.
WrongNostradamus'omh » 26 Sep 2023, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ But you do worship metaphors, maybes, and make believe now isn't eternity where genetics cannot be eternally separate in ancestral order of arriving forward now uniquely here, spontaneously alive, evolving one at a time simultaneously present in ever changing form.
Every character is defended by circumstantial evidence created within the species itself and sustained each generation entering the moment here until departed never same shape formed their fertilized cell when conceived to replace their own 4 previous generation gaps lived so far.
Universal constant regardless plant, animal, predator, prey, asexual, male, female replacement of their previous ancestries only going to leave added or not ancestors after birth.
50/50 chance 90% won't reach 1 of 16 dead great great grandparents let alone live long enough to become 1 of 32 dead great great great grandparents that were the 5th previous generation gap living in the past before one was conceived to replace.
The republic of ancestries creating rules to stay honest about how and why a person is specifically which, what, where, when, whom lived to this point evolving reached now.
Rule of law dictates serving self anointed superior intellectual minds, not individual brain hiding behind a "We the people Believe ______________ mantra is possible if everyone submits to the faith now isn't eternity. Pick a franchise that is working socially in this atmosphere today and not your tradition family's faith, you will get shunned. Go against the social consensus and get exiled. Stand against humanities and like blasphemy get executed in a way that sends a message for generations never defy any franchise of humanity or face economic loss of one's earnings and/or inheritance.
eternally separated as specifically adapting in the moment here since conceived to decomposed corpse? I know you never agree to that always suggesting anything else is possible because 350 to 400 generation gaps said so historically.Mrkelly » 26 Sep 2023, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ Wrong
I have always said now is eternity
we are always here now .. always
"eternally separated as specifically adapting in the moment here since conceived to decomposed corpse?"Nostradamus'omh » 26 Sep 2023, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ eternally separated as specifically adapting in the moment here since conceived to decomposed corpse? I know you never agree to that always suggesting anything else is possible because 350 to 400 generation gaps said so historically.
Yet that is how your body is evolving now. Now how you are behaving here. All done by choice of navigating space instinctively or defining time hypothetically.Mrkelly » 26 Sep 2023, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑ "eternally separated as specifically adapting in the moment here since conceived to decomposed corpse?"
complete and utter babble
Oh look-eee who slithered in? It's Noodle dik!
sootedupCyndi » 26 Sep 2023, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
sez the biggest piggy on the internet! you get what you deserve!!!