Liberal Forum

maineman » 24 Sep 2023, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2023, 4:27 pm

I would suggest that not one court in all the land, when confronted with a complainant that alleged massive voter fraud and further claimed, in front of that court, that there was credible, producible evidence that supported that complaint, would summarily dismiss such a case, and that such an arbitrary and capricious dismissal would be clear grounds for appeal.

And yet they did.  Over and over. 
It's stunning how stupid you are. 
 

maineman » 24 Sep 2023, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2023, 4:09 pm

Because they offered no credible allegations of actual voter fraud in any of their initial complaint filings.  That’s because, as officers of the court, team Kraken knew that alleging massive voter fraud outside of four seasons landscaping was acceptable behavior, but actually attesting to it in front of a judge could get them disbarred.  Don’t you ever wonder why Rudy never offered anything from those five volumes of “evidence” he was waving around that day in any legal complaint he ever filed?

He did offer them in court, but was denied.  Again, you're showing your own ignorance here. 
It was #18 of the list in the OP. 

Great job making an *** of yourself again, Room Temp.
 

golfboy » 24 Sep 2023, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2023, 5:18 pm

And yet they did.  Over and over. 
It's stunning how stupid you are.

I would love to see the promised compelling evidence of widespread vote fraud. I believe democrats capitalized on social unrest and a pandemic. They spent months changing voting laws in the name of Rona. When that didn't ensure victory they poured gasoline on simmering racial tensions. The clear message was if Trump wins city blocks would continue to burn. Democrats and intelligence agencies controlled traditional and social media messaging. Labeling the hunter laptop Russian created disinformation. They took full advantage of the new mail in emergency voting procedures to increase ballot harvesting operations.

I have seen no evidence of widespread or systemic voter fraud. I was ready to believe it but the evidence never appeared.
 

Neo » 24 Sep 2023, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2023, 5:27 pm

I have seen no evidence of widespread or systemic voter fraud. I was ready to believe it but the evidence never appeared.

Really?  It's everywhere. 
Vote_Spikes_Report (election-integrity.info)
 

golfboy » 24 Sep 2023, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2023, 5:42 pm

Really?  It's everywhere. 
Vote_Spikes_Report (election-integrity.info)

Plenty of smoke, circumstantial evidence, not enough fire. I thought three years in we would have whistle blowers and hard evidence. The official narrative is obviously ****. It was an election held during a pandemic under emergency procedures. A vote held under terrorist blm threat. Hardly the cleanest and most secure election ever held in a western democracy. Vote fraud wouldn't surprise me but, under these conditions, it wasn't needed for Biden to win. 
 

Neo » 24 Sep 2023, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2023, 6:04 pm

Plenty of smoke, circumstantial evidence, not enough fire. I thought three years in we would have whistle blowers and hard evidence. The official narrative is obviously ****. It was an election held during a pandemic under emergency procedures. A vote held under terrorist blm threat. Hardly the cleanest and most secure election ever held in a western democracy. Vote fraud wouldn't surprise me but, under these conditions, it wasn't needed for Biden to win.

You'll never convince me Joe Biden got over 11 more votes while not campaigning, than Barack Obama did in 2008.
 

golfboy » 24 Sep 2023, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2023, 6:48 pm

You'll never convince me Joe Biden got over 11 more votes while not campaigning, than Barack Obama did in 2008.

Looking at how deranged Trump made historically stable liberals, I believe that hate was pretty wide spread. I will never believe 11 million more voted for Biden than Obama but I can believe that extra 11 million voted against Trump. He seems to grab a 35% section of the electorate by the ******. Unfortunately that 35% controls the media and carries lots of influence in Washington. 
 

maineman » 24 Sep 2023, 5:06 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2023, 5:06 pm

Why don’t you leave me alne? You already proclaimed rational discussion was off the table?  Make up your **** mind, you self-admitted cocksucker?

You can be as alne as you want, dick sucker. 

I will continue to respond to you as I see fit, you child molesting ***. 
 

golfboy » 24 Sep 2023, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2023, 5:18 pm

And yet they did.  Over and over. 
It's stunning how stupid you are.

name one case where credible, producible evidence of election fraud was cited in the original complaint and the judge summarily dismissed it.

Cannonpointer » 24 Sep 2023, 8:09 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2023, 8:09 pm

You can be as alne as you want, dick sucker. 

I will continue to respond to you as I see fit, you child molesting ***.

I am a caucasian who has never molested a child.  Your batting average is 000.

again…if rational discussion is impossible, why do you feel compelled to come sniffing around my posts?  Why wouldn’t someone seek out rational thoughtful discussion instead of wasting time on an endeavor that, by your own admission, was incapable of yielding such a result?
 

maineman » 24 Sep 2023, 10:56 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2023, 10:56 pm

I am a caucasian who has never molested a child.  Your batting average is 000.

So you think *** is a RACE, you **** bigot?

I call you a *** and you protest that you are caucasian, and then you lie that you're not a child danger?

When are you going to stop ducking my question, and tell us why you felt it was so important to point out that your children are heterosexual, you freak?

 

Asked and answered. Now, explain to me why you keep humping my leg when you’ve already admitted that rational conversation between us was impossible? Go jack off in your hankie you stalking creep.

golfboy » 24 Sep 2023, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2023, 5:24 pm

He did offer them in court, but was denied.  Again, you're showing your own ignorance here. 
It was #18 of the list in the OP. 

Great job making an *** of yourself again, Room Temp.

Five binders of “evidence” to prove 69 ballots were received in unsealed envelopes?  If that ain’t massive voter fraud, what is?  
 

^^^The weak queer is now resorting to responding to me without tagging me and then praying that I don't see it.

The *** is still running from telling us why it was SO IMPORTANT to inform the board that his kids are all heterosexual. 
 

Neo » 24 Sep 2023, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2023, 5:27 pm

I would love to see the promised compelling evidence of widespread vote fraud. I believe democrats capitalized on social unrest and a pandemic. They spent months changing voting laws in the name of Rona. When that didn't ensure victory they poured gasoline on simmering racial tensions. The clear message was if Trump wins city blocks would continue to burn. Democrats and intelligence agencies controlled traditional and social media messaging. Labeling the hunter laptop Russian created disinformation. They took full advantage of the new mail in emergency voting procedures to increase ballot harvesting operations.

I have seen no evidence of widespread or systemic voter fraud. I was ready to believe it but the evidence never appeared.

Your first paragraph voided your last paragraph. 

Cannonpointer » 24 Sep 2023, 11:36 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2023, 11:36 pm

^^^The weak queer is now resorting to responding to me without tagging me and then praying that I don't see it.

The *** is still running from telling us why it was SO IMPORTANT to inform the board that his kids are all heterosexual.

He's a typical Democrat....a hypocrit first and foremost. 
 

RebelGator » 25 Sep 2023, 5:25 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 5:25 am

Your first paragraph voided your last paragraph.

There is a difference between ballot harvesting and electronic vote manipulation. We have plenty of proof of ballot harvesting. We need to get rid of months long mail in voting season if the Republicans ever want to stand a chance.
 

maineman » 24 Sep 2023, 11:29 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2023, 11:29 pm

Five binders of “evidence” to prove 69 ballots were received in unsealed envelopes?  If that ain’t massive voter fraud, what is?

Does the stupid hurt mainbitch?  His evidence wasn't even allowed to be presented in court. 
the more you talk, the more ignorant you look. 
 

maineman » 24 Sep 2023, 10:51 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2023, 10:51 pm

name one case where credible, producible evidence of election fraud was cited in the original complaint and the judge summarily dismissed it.

I just gave you and entire list in OP of this thread. 
WTF do you ask for information already provided?
Oh wait, you STILL don't know how links work, do you room temp?
 

golfboy » 21 Sep 2023, 9:04 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Sep 2023, 9:04 pm

Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases.
Only 30 were decided on the merits, and of those Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed (for ignorant liberals it means Trump/GOP won) 22 of them.

2020 US Presidential Election Related Lawsuits

These are worthwhile statistics to remember when confronted with Liberal Idiots spewing lies. Thanks for posting.