Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
When A Liberal Claims Trump Lost all Election Lawsuits
When A Liberal Claims Trump Lost all Election Lawsuits
By golfboy
21 Sep 2023 9:04 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
26 Sep 2023 9:17 am
Do you not believe that the FBI and the "51 former intelligence agents" forced Twitter and other social media to lie about the Hunter laptop when they had it in thier hands and KNEW it was authentic, doing so just weeks before the elections?maineman » 25 Sep 2023, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Show me one bit of actual evidence of actual voter fraud from 2020.
And if you're still intent on being a cement-headed and gullible fool, this website shows the fraud committed in each state.A Sampling of Recent Election Fraud Cases from Across the United Stateshttps://www.heritage.org/voterfraud
The Heritage Foundation’s Election Fraud Database presents a sampling of recent proven instances of election fraud from across the country. Each and every one of the cases in this database represents an instance in which a public official, usually a prosecutor, thought it serious enough to act upon it. And each and every one ended in a finding that the individual had engaged in wrongdoing in connection with an election hoping to affect its outcome — or that the results of an election were sufficiently in question and had to be overturned. This database is not an exhaustive or comprehensive list. This database is intended to demonstrate the vulnerabilities in the election system and the many ways in which fraud is committed.Continue scrolling to view the database, or Read More
1,438Proven instances of voter fraud
1,240Criminal convictions
48Civil penalties
108Diversion program
25Judicial finding
17Official finding
https://electionfraud20.org/fraud-summa ... nsylvania/
But I have little doubt that any demented liberal like yourself would accept ANY evidence of fraud you're shown.
So, by all means, keep your empty head buried in the sand like every other Biden-lover does!
26 Sep 2023 9:42 am
****, repeatedly debunked fake news.Zeets2 » 26 Sep 2023, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑ Do you not believe that the FBI and the "51 former intelligence agents" forced Twitter and other social media to lie about the Hunter laptop when they had it in thier hands and KNEW it was authentic, doing so just weeks before the elections?
And if you're still intent on being a cement-headed and gullible fool, this website shows the fraud committed in each state.
https://electionfraud20.org/fraud-summa ... nsylvania/
But I have little doubt that any demented liberal like yourself would accept ANY evidence of fraud you're shown.
So, by all means, keep your empty head buried in the sand like every other Biden-lover does!
26 Sep 2023 9:43 am
NoneConsRule » 26 Sep 2023, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑ How much voter fraud is acceptable, in your opinion? Feel free to give the percentage of total votes cast that you use as your threshold.
Asking for a friend.
26 Sep 2023 9:48 am
And courts across the land have provided proscriptive remedies to ensure future public health emergencies do not cause voting rule changes occur improperly. They have also said that no voter who followed the rules should be retroactively disenfranchised.ConsRule » 26 Sep 2023, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑ It is, however, unconstitutional when those changes impact how electors for the state are selected.
26 Sep 2023 10:02 am
Which doesn't change the fact that unconstitutional changes to voting laws/rules happened before the 2020 election. And you can quit with the "disenfranchised" ****. Disenfranchised means a person's RIGHT TO VOTE was taken away...it does NOT mean their improperly and/or illegally cast vote was disallowed.maineman » 26 Sep 2023, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ And courts across the land have provided proscriptive remedies to ensure future public health emergencies do not cause voting rule changes occur improperly. They have also said that no voter who followed the rules should be retroactively disenfranchised.
26 Sep 2023 10:15 am
Yeah? Who is it that "debunked" the fact that the FBI demanded Twitter to withhold the evidence of the Hunter laptop that they knew was authentic, or that the White House ordered those 51 former CIA agents to produce a letter claiming it was Russian disinformation when that was repeatedly proven false?
Where's YOUR evidence that this has been debunked?
You liberals must really enjoy the view you get with you head so deeply up your dumb ***!
26 Sep 2023 7:08 pm
What does Hunter’s **** laptop have to do with voter fraud?Zeets2 » 26 Sep 2023, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah? Who is it that "debunked" the fact that the FBI demanded Twitter to withhold the evidence of the Hunter laptop that they knew was authentic, or that the White House ordered those 51 former CIA agents to produce a letter claiming it was Russian disinformation when that was repeatedly proven false?
Where's YOUR evidence that this has been debunked?
You liberals must really enjoy the view you get with you head so deeply up your dumb ***!
26 Sep 2023 7:10 pm
voters who cast their votes in accordance with the rules published by their cities/counties/states cannot have those votes discarded after the fact.ConsRule » 26 Sep 2023, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ Which doesn't change the fact that unconstitutional changes to voting laws/rules happened before the 2020 election. And you can quit with the "disenfranchised" ****. Disenfranchised means a person's RIGHT TO VOTE was taken away...it does NOT mean their improperly and/or illegally cast vote was disallowed.
26 Sep 2023 7:11 pm
A statically relevant number of voters would not have voted for Biden if they knew the laptop wasn't a Russian attempt to influence our election.maineman » 26 Sep 2023, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑ What does Hunter’s **** laptop have to do with voter fraud?
26 Sep 2023 7:14 pm
Why, because you say so?
26 Sep 2023 7:16 pm
Sure they can. But it didn't happen because no judge had the balls.maineman » 26 Sep 2023, 7:10 pm » wrote: ↑ voters who cast their votes in accordance with the rules published by their cities/counties/states cannot have those votes discarded after the fact.
There have been many elections overturned because of crap like that happening.
26 Sep 2023 7:27 pm
I never said that could happen. Those are your words, not mine.maineman » 26 Sep 2023, 7:10 pm » wrote: ↑ voters who cast their votes in accordance with the rules published by their cities/counties/states cannot have those votes discarded after the fact.
26 Sep 2023 10:18 pm
maineman » 26 Sep 2023, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑ What does Hunter’s **** laptop have to do with voter fraud?
Damn, are you really that stupid?
27 Sep 2023 6:44 am
FIFYBruce » 21 Sep 2023, 10:20 pm » wrote: ↑ How **** gullible and stupid would anybody have to be in order to believe Biden won the 2020 election?
You had some extra words.
27 Sep 2023 8:25 am
is obfuscation the only tool in your belt?
27 Sep 2023 8:26 am
name one that had "crap" even remotely "like that" that was overturned.golfboy » 26 Sep 2023, 7:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure they can. But it didn't happen because no judge had the balls.
There have been many elections overturned because of crap like that happening.
27 Sep 2023 8:27 am
Because fraud is a word with a very specific meaning. You should look it up and try to use it with some degree of specificity going forward.
27 Sep 2023 8:29 am
that is not FRAUD. People responding to the news, fake or otherwise, is not voter fraud.Neo » 26 Sep 2023, 7:11 pm » wrote: ↑ A statically relevant number of voters would not have voted for Biden if they knew the laptop wasn't a Russian attempt to influence our election.
27 Sep 2023 9:19 am
People being prevented from knowing the truth through coordinated media manipulation and government censorship may not technically be fraud but it is frauds incestuous first cousin. It was wrong, it sets a dangerous precedent, and is wholly un-American.maineman » 27 Sep 2023, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ that is not FRAUD. People responding to the news, fake or otherwise, is not voter fraud.
27 Sep 2023 9:20 am
Simple fool!, as if you didn't know!maineman » 26 Sep 2023, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑ What does Hunter’s **** laptop have to do with voter fraud?
Just play dumb and the rest of us won't blame you for being such a gullible pawn and helping to stick us with this incompetent, senile, corrupt, idiot you voted for!
Poll: 17% of Biden Voters Would Have Abandoned Him if They Knew About Stories the Media Censored
Western Journal By Johnathan Jones 11/24/20
As many as 17% of those who voted for Democrat Joe Biden might have chosen differently at the polls, had they been given fair media coverage of the candidates in the weeks leading up to the election, according to a report.Alleged election malfeasance aside, the establishment media, as expected, played a large part in interfering with the 2020 election, as concluded by Newbusters.
Media’s suppression of Hunter Biden’s laptop was election interference
Had Biden voters known of scandal, election would've tipped to Trump
Washington Times By Tim Murtaugh 11/12/20
When The NY Post broke the story of the laptop and its contents in mid-October 2020, it revealed the extent to which Hunter Biden sold access to his powerful father.
Emails showed that the elder Biden was aware of his son’s influence-peddling to foreign operators, approved it and was likely a financial beneficiary (“10% for the big guy,” read one email).
Other emails indicated that Hunter and Joe Biden co-mingled their finances, shared bank accounts and covered each other’s bills. In one message, Hunter revealed that he had been locked out of a bank account and that his father was using it. In a text, Hunter complained that he was required to give his father half of his money.
This was explosive stuff just before a presidential election. And most of the media wanted none of it.
Twitter suspended The NY Post’s account and barred anyone from sharing the story. Facebook similarly throttled its dissemination. Other than The Post and Fox News, no major news outlets would touch it except to aggressively discount it.
Isn't it clear even to a Biden lover like you that by using the FBI to inform Twitter and Facebook that the laptop was "Russian disinformation" and ordering them to suppress the story WHEN THEY KNEW IT WAS AUTHENTIC, then getting 51 former CIA agents to sign their names to a phony document attesting to its false claim, IS DEMOCRAT ELECTION INTERFERENCE!Bozell To Levin: Survey Shows 4.6% Of Democrats Would Not Have Voted For Joe Biden Had They Known Hunter Biden Story
11/12/20
(CNS News) — Media Research Center (MRC) Founder and Pres. Brent Bozell laid out on the Mark Levin Show on Tuesday survey data indicating that the media’s bias by omission resulted in the defeat of President Donald Trump.
Bozell explained that it is well-known how the mainstream media dedicates over 90% of its Trump airtime to negative coverage of the president, but the MRC president argues that their omission of Trump’s successes and Joe Biden’s failures is much more dangerous.
“We took a survey after the elections, on the night of the elections, and asked Democrats if they knew about the Hunter Biden story. A full 36% of Democrats knew nothing about the Hunter Biden story,” Bozell said. “Further, 4.6% of Democrats said they would not have voted for Biden had they known this story. We then took that 4.6% and we spread it across the electoral landscape.”
So tell me, genius. WHERE'S THE (corrupt) DOJ INVESTIGATION OF THAT ELECTION INTERFERENCE BY THE FBI AND CIA? HUH?
Who is online
In total there are 6200 users online :: 14 registered, 13 bots, and 6173 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, FJB, Beekeeper, SouthernFried, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, Sayaras, sole, ….., Huey, Fuelman
Bots: Bolt, DuckDuckBot, MicroMessenger, YandexBot, curl/7, ADmantX, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, CriteoBot, Googlebot, Applebot