"Safe and effective" is a legal standard - not an opinion.LincolnNebraska » 26 Sep 2023, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑ Agreed. It's as simple as this. Adjectives are judgements. They are opinions, not facts.
False.LincolnNebraska » 26 Sep 2023, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑ It's only a lie if he believed it was not safe and effective and said otherwise.
Safe and effective are two adjectives, and hence, opinions.Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑ "Safe and effective" is a legal standard - not an opinion.
Repeat that until you understand it.
Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ False.
It was a lie if he knew the FDA had not declared it so.
And he knew the FDA had not declared it so, because he was the one who TOLD the FDA to skip the testing and issue an emergency use authorization.
You need to think in heterosexual terms about this. The gay thinking is clouding your masculinity and making you think like a bitch.
Trump's bitch.
Those two words are a legal designation that you are not competent to make. We don't et just any clown make legal distinctions - even when those legal distinctions are adjectives.LincolnNebraska » 26 Sep 2023, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Safe and effective are two adjectives, and hence, opinions.
Lying is conveying something as true when you know it is false.Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Fun fact.
Under the law, the standard is, "Knew or ought to have known."
Every criminal on earth can lie and say I did not know - and no jury on earth can read minds.
So the legal standard to determine someone is responsible for lying is, "Knew or ought to have known."
Before a government agent lies that a vaccine has been put through the rigorous testing required under the law before using the term "safe and effective," that agent has a duty to be sure it is true.
ESPECIALLY when the government agent in question created a program called "Operation Warp Speed" in order to bypass the rigorous testing required under the law before using the term "safe and effective."
See how that works? In man world, you cannot AUTHOR the program that skipped the testing, and then say, "I had no idea they had skipped the testing."
Trump lied. People died. You may go now. Leave the door ajar.
It's still an opinion. Do you really not know the difference between fact versus opinion?Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Those two words are a legal designation that you are not competent to make. We don't et just any clown make legal distinctions - even when those legal distinctions are adjectives.
Again - the gaythink is clouding your manhood, son.
lmao. That doesn't even make any sense.
Under the law, Lying is saying anything you had a responsibility to know was false. And since trump is the one who waived the testing, he knew the testing required to make the claim "safe and effective" had not been done.LincolnNebraska » 26 Sep 2023, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Lying is conveying something as true when you know it is false.
An opinion is not a fact.
Oh, believe me, I know. You are functioning in precisely that age range.
It is a false utterance about a legal definition. That is not a matter of opinion, stupid.LincolnNebraska » 26 Sep 2023, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑ It's still an opinion. Do you really not know the difference between fact versus opinion?
lol. Learn to compose a coherent sentence.Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Under the law, Lying is saying anything you had a responsibility to know was false.
You now sound like Nostradamus.
Okay, I'll bite. So?Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑
If I ride by on a horse and you tell people you saw me on a cow, that is a lie - not an opinion.
To you - an admitted fourth grade functioning fruitcake.
Like the one you responded to, retard?
To a ***.
Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Like the one you responded to, retard?
Google it, fruitcake.
Google "safe and effective," retard.LincolnNebraska » 26 Sep 2023, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm going to internet search your incoherent sentence?
For a ***.