Search it yourself. You can't even define simple words.Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Google "safe and effective," retard.
Learn that it is a legal term, retard.
lol When the poster resorts to "stop embarrassing yourself," you know they got nothing.Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑ To you - an admitted fourth grade functioning fruitcake.
Here's an idea - why don't you stop embarrassing yourself, your schools and you nation, you retard, and just GOOGLE the term, "safe and effective."
Learn something, downsey.
Okay, dick sucker
Stop embarrassing yourself.LincolnNebraska » 26 Sep 2023, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑ lol When the poster resorts to "stop embarrassing yourself," you know they got nothing.
Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. Glad you trust your search engine. I'm sure it's quite objective and accurate.
2. The reason the left made it a virtue signal to vax is that they believed trump was against it. Your NAMBLA sources only gay that fact - they do not negate it.
3. Trump lied BEFORE late 2021. He lied when he was still in office.
That's 16, by the way.
16 is the number of times I have told you that and you have pretended not to hear me because you have no answer that will save your orange dreamsycle.
In the world of men, words have meanings. Kids and women speak without thought of consequence. Men do not.
They're discussing concepts like standards, benefit-risk, and recommendations. Those are concepts regarding judgments, not facts. Your entire summary is about judgment. Judgment does not lend itself to true-false.
Hey, man, perhaps you can also "google" some simple definitions for words like lie, opinion, and fact.
Try reading it! lolCannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Stop embarrassing yourself.
https://www.niskanencenter.org/safe-effective-mean-fda/
I did, homo. It has to do with statutory obligations under the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act.
I googled what you did not understand, and presented it to you so that you would be without excuse for your effeminate ball washing, pookie.LincolnNebraska » 26 Sep 2023, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey, man, perhaps you can also "google" some simple definitions for words like lie, opinion, and fact.
Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I did, homo. It has to do with statutory obligations under the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act.
It is a LEGAL DESIGNATION - not an opinion.
If a weak little queer like you put those words on something he was selling, he would go to jail. When he cried that it was just an opinion, they would bugger him for being suck a weak little *** and a girl.
Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I googled what you did not understand, and presented it to you so that you would be without excuse for your effeminate ball washing, pookie.
I'm good.
It demonstrates that the words "safe and effective" are a legal designation - not an opinion.LincolnNebraska » 26 Sep 2023, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Good lawd. Your piece actually demonstrated what I've been saying. Mind boggling.
Your own source discusses changing standards. That's makes it opinion.Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑ It demonstrates that the words "safe and effective" are a legal designation - not an opinion.
It's pretty clear that you are gay.
So you admit the terms are based on STANDARDS - not opinions.LincolnNebraska » 26 Sep 2023, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Your own source discusses changing standards. That's makes it opinion.
Standards are based on opinion. They're not facts.Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ So you admit the terms are based on STANDARDS - not opinions.
The fact that standards change from time to time does not mean they are opinions. They are standards.
It's pretty clear that your are quite a stupid fellow.
I can get you the information - I CANNOT get you the education or the intellect.
Okay girl. Whatever you chirp to defend your orange dreamsicle.LincolnNebraska » 26 Sep 2023, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Standards are based on opinion. They're not facts.