Liberal Forum

Robert Kennedy talks out of two sides of his face on Gun Control.  He recently claimed, just like Joe Biden claimed, that "he's not going to take your guns away"

However, Kennedy is on the record saying that he would get behind an assault weapons ban, which the overwhelming majority of Democrats support.  Further, he’s also stated that he supports more restrictions on gun purchases to make it more difficult for people to buy, own and carry guns. 

This **** Democrat is like the rest of the Democrats - an F-ing 2-faced liar. 

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 9:26 am

Robert Kennedy talks out of two sides of his face on Gun Control.  He recently claimed, just like Joe Biden claimed, that "he's not going to take your guns away"

However, Kennedy is on the record 

Great link.

Are you "on record" making this claim?
 

Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 9:37 am

Great link.

Are you "on record" making this claim?

Stop being like the lazy Democrats demanding links.  I'm going to give you links, just this one time.....but you're still lazy!

https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment ... -his-desk/

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4 ... -violence/

Am I "on the record" making this claim?  Yeah, I started a topic about it, didn't I.
 

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 10:06 am

Stop being like the lazy Democrats demanding links.  I'm going to give you links, just this one time.....but you're still lazy!

https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment ... -his-desk/

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4 ... -violence/

Am I "on the record" making this claim?  Yeah, I started a topic about it, didn't I.

I'm on record agreeing that you're on record. 
 
Did he say anything about taking the guns, and THEN doing due process?

Oh, wait - that was another guy. Nevermind.

Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 10:11 am

I'm on record agreeing that you're on record. 
 
Did he say anything about taking the guns, and THEN doing due process?

Oh, wait - that was another guy. Nevermind.

He says he wants to ban assault weapons.  The guy lived in Malibu CA for years. He likely has never even seen an "assault weapon".  He's just another full-of-****, elitist Democrat, with no Constitutional conviction who will do and say whatever to get elected.  That's what he does when he's not getting high.
 

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 10:22 am

He says he wants to ban assault weapons.  The guy lived in Malibu CA for years. He likely has never even seen an "assault weapon".  He's just another full-of-****, elitist Democrat, with no Constitutional conviction who will do and say whatever to get elected.  That's what he does when he's not getting high.

Constitutional conviction - the kind employed to give israel socialized medicine while americans die of preventable diseases?
 

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 10:22 am

He says he wants to ban assault weapons.  

Don't waste my time with what he SAYS.

Tell me what he MEANS.

Like, when Trump SAID, "I'd rather take the weapons first, THEN do the due process," that was not what he MEANT.

So, don't bother quoting him. Have one of his adherents explain to me what he really MEANT.

Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 10:25 am

Constitutional conviction - the kind employed to give israel socialized medicine while americans die of preventable diseases?

Most Republicans would be for cutting funding to Israel. Unless we are getting something very specific for our money, there's no reason to throw money at them.  I would cut them along with NPR, PBS, The National Endowment for the Arts, Africa Command, African Development Foundation, Global Media Agency, Healthcare Research Agency, Agricultural Marketing Services, BATFE, CIA, FBI, CDC, Botanic Garden, Barry Goldwater Scholarship program, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Center for Nutrition Policy, Commission of Fine Arts, International Religious Freedom Commission, Community Oriented Policy Services, Elder Justice Initiative, Energy Star Program....

Dude, if you don't see all of the government waste in the tiny handful of agencies I listed, agencies that all can be easily eliminated, then YOU ARE A DEMOCRAT.
 

Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 10:29 am

Don't waste my time with what he SAYS.

Tell me what he MEANS.

Like, when Trump SAID, "I'd rather take the weapons first, THEN do the due process," that was not what he MEANT.

So, don't bother quoting him. Have one of his adherents explain to me what he really MEANT.

I don't read people's minds.  I just listen to what they say and then make up my mind.

I leave the wacky mind-reading, aura-visions, and utterance-interpretations to the spiritually confused and the chemically high.
 

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 10:36 am

Most Republicans would be for cutting funding to Israel.

Define "cutting."

Define "would be."

Would be except for what? Except for voting for it? Except for sucking AIPAC's dick at every possible opportunity, like sold-out, corrupted rats?

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 10:36 am

Unless we are getting something very specific for our money, there's no reason to throw money at them.  I would cut them along with NPR, PBS, The National Endowment for the Arts, Africa Command, African Development Foundation, Global Media Agency, Healthcare Research Agency, Agricultural Marketing Services, BATFE, CIA, FBI, CDC, Botanic Garden, Barry Goldwater Scholarship program, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Center for Nutrition Policy, Commission of Fine Arts, International Religious Freedom Commission, Community Oriented Policy Services, Elder Justice Initiative, Energy Star Program....

Dude, if you don't see all of the government waste in the tiny handful of agencies I listed, agencies that all can be easily eliminated, then YOU ARE A DEMOCRAT.

I have never once doubted your willingness to gore the other fellow's ox, Proggie Went a-Courtin'.

Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 10:41 am

Define "cutting."

Define "would be."

Would be except for what? Except for voting for it? Except for sucking AIPAC's dick at every possible opportunity, like sold-out, corrupted rats?

I have never once doubted your willingness to gore the other fellow's ox, Proggie Went a-Courtin'.

Would be as in "need the votes in the House, Senate and the Presidency".  Cutting means just that - reducing the amount Israel gets.  I would not expect Republicans to cut all aid to Israel without cutting all aid to every other country out there as well.
 

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 10:38 am

I don't read people's minds.  I just listen to what they say and then make up my mind.
 

And by they you mean think tanks (or their downstream outlets).
And by make up your mind you mean repeat your received talking points.

That's why on the non-cosmetic issues, you and Biden are peas and carrots, Forrest. 
 

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 10:43 am

Would be as in "need the votes in the House, Senate and the Presidency".  Cutting means just that - reducing the amount Israel gets.  I would not expect Republicans to cut all aid to Israel without cutting all aid to every other country out there as well.

You're the gift that keeps on giving, proggie.   

So - "would be" - if we were not all voting for it. GOT it. 

And then by "cutting" you meant, "giving less" - which is an outright gay lie as it has happened zero times, and repukes would nuke the moon if anyone tried it (not that anyone would). 
 

Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 10:44 am

And by they you mean think tanks (or their downstream outlets).
And by make up your mind you mean repeat your received talking points.

That's why on the non-cosmetic issues, you and Biden are peas and carrots, Forrest.

What's the deal, Cannonpointer, are you supporting RFK, Jr.?  Do you like his stance on gun control?  Do you want him as your president.  ****, just come out and spill the beans already.  You're a closet Democrat, aren't you.
 

Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 10:48 am

You're the gift that keeps on giving, proggie.   

So - "would be" - if we were not all voting for it. GOT it. 

And then by "cutting" you meant, "giving less" - which is an outright gay lie as it has happened zero times, and repukes would nuke the moon if anyone tried it (not that anyone would).

It's what I want.  It is what the majority of Republicans want.  We need make our party leaders listen to us, now don't we.

But, Cannonpointer, you're not a Republican.  So, you don't count. Why should Republicans listen to a damn thing you have to say?
 

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 10:51 am

What's the deal, Cannonpointer, are you supporting RFK, Jr.?  Do you like his stance on gun control?  Do you want him as your president.  ****, just come out and spill the beans already.  You're a closet Democrat, aren't you.

I like his stance on pharma - which is killing more mother **** than guns (thanks, drumpf).

I'm an OPEN FDR Democrat. If you could stay focused on other than *** dick, you would remembered that.

You support a candidate who said, "I would rather take the guns first, and do the due process part later." 

It's clear who favors gun grabbing, fruitcake.     


 

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 10:53 am

It's what I want.  It is what the majority of Republicans want.  We need make our party leaders listen to us, now don't we.

Huh.

Ten minutes ago, the repuke party was a paisley panoply of populist platitudes. Ten minutes later, you're admitting that the PARTY does not represent the BASE. Or, "Just like democ rats."

You're all over the board, Clete.

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 10:53 am

But, Cannonpointer, you're not a Republican.  So, you don't count. Why should Republicans listen to a damn thing you have to say?

Oh., Idunno. Hearing criticism from other than the chorus is what the big parties do?

You REALLY need to land on a spot when it comes to all those multi-ethnic, multi-gender, diversity equity and inclusion voices informing the paisley party, pookie.

Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 10:56 am

I like his stance on pharma - which is killing more mother **** than guns (thanks, drumpf).

I'm an OPEN FDR Democrat. If you could stay focused on other than *** dick, you would remembered that.

You support a candidate who said, "I would rather take the guns first, and do the due process part later." 

It's clear who favors gun grabbing, fruitcake.   

Trump does not support any assault weapons ban.
Trump does not support any handgun ban.
Trump does not support a ban on military style rifles.
Trump does not support making it harder for Americans to get guns.
Trump is wrong on his stance concerning taking guns from people who make disturbing public statements - he needs to be educated on that.
Trump was wrong on his stance on bump-stocks, again, he needs to be educated about that. 

But, this is nothing compared to what the Democrats will do to our gun rights if it ever gets the Senate, House and Presidency again.   Hey, I am primarily a one-issue voter - GUNS AND GUN OWNER RIGHTS.  It defines the mindset of our leaders.  Either they are afraid of their constituents owning powerful weapons, because they are against us, or they support our right to own powerful weapons, because they are ONE OF US.
 

Only thing we know for sure about Trumpy

is that while draining The Swamp....

he hired The Swamp. Trumpy is terrible at guberning

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 11:02 am

Trump does not support any assault weapons ban.
Trump does not support any handgun ban.
Trump does not support a ban on military style rifles.
Trump does not support making it harder for Americans to get guns.
Trump is wrong on his stance concerning taking guns from people who make disturbing public statements - he needs to be educated on that.
Trump was wrong on his stance on bump-stocks, again, he needs to be educated about that. 

But, this is nothing compared to what the Democrats will do to our gun rights if it ever gets the Senate, House and Presidency again.   Hey, I am primarily a one-issue voter - GUNS AND GUN OWNER RIGHTS.  It defines the mindset of our leaders.  Either they are afraid of their constituents owning powerful weapons, because they are against us, or they support our right to own powerful weapons, because they are ONE OF US.

I get that "one issue" thing.

But I'm three issue. Don't steal our guns, don't molest our children and don't try to make us lab rats. 

Those are all deal breakers for me. 

If I could get you repukes to stop polishing AIPAC's dick and stop aligning with Biden and Pelosi on foreign policy, that would be nice, too.