Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 12:56 pm

I am not a democrat, nazi boi.
 
But I guess if you have nothing, throw rocks.

You keep telling me you're an FDR Democrat.  Make up your mind already!
 

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm

You keep telling me you're an FDR Democrat.  Make up your mind already!

An FDR Democrat is - by definition, you drooling idiot - NOT a member of the democrat party.

Do you think a Jeffersonian Republican is a member of lindsey graham's party, you tard?
 

Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 1:35 pm

An FDR Democrat is - by definition, you drooling idiot - NOT a member of the democrat party.

Do you think a Jeffersonian Republican is a member of lindsey graham's party, you tard?

Well, FDR was a Democrat, but a Communist Democrat.  Are you trying to tell me that you're really a communist?

As for Jefferson, yeah, Jefferson would make a good Republican today.
 

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 1:40 pm

Well, FDR was a Democrat, but a Communist Democrat.  Are you trying to tell me that you're really a communist?

Are you trying really hard to remove any doubt of your flaming transgenderism and homosexuality?

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 1:40 pm

As for Jefferson, yeah, Jefferson would make a good Republican today.

Well damn, I guess you answered THAT question without hesitation, fruitcake.

FDR saved capitalism, stupid.

Only a flaming gay would argue that investing in national infrastructure is BAD for the economy, and investing in war is good for it.

Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 1:43 pm

Are you trying really hard to remove any doubt of your flaming transgenderism and homosexuality?

Well damn, I guess you answered THAT question without hesitation, fruitcake.

FDR saved capitalism, stupid.

Only a flaming gay would argue that investing in national infrastructure is BAD for the economy, and investing in war is good for it.

FDR got us into WWII.  That is the only thing that got us out of the Great Depression.  His stupid infrastructure projects was 95% craptastic project that never amounted to anything.  In fact, I was horseback riding in Colorado this summer and got to see some failed FDR projects and old FDR bum camps.  They guy was worthless.  He really was.  But, you go on and keep jacking off to his photo.  Just don't shoot your wad on your screen.  There's a lot more school'n I'm going to have to do to you, 'ol boy.

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 1:53 pm

FDR got us into WWII.  That is the only thing that got us out of the Great Depression.

So, let's get your gayness on the record.

Investing in the dams and bridges and parks and rural electrification that served 4 generations of Americans and are still paying for themselves every generation to this very day - THAT was "bad" for the economy.

Paying corporations to build tanks and planes and bombs that were blown up and abandoned all over the world - that was "good" for our economy. 

I can actually SEE the benefits of the TVA, the Hoover Dam, the Bay Bridge, the Blue Ridge Parkway. Explain how blowing up Hiroshima economically benefits America.        
 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 1:59 pm

So, let's get your gayness on the record.


 

Now, is this going to be my "permanent record"?  My FBI file?  My CIA dossier?  Or just Cannonpointer's Commie-White-List record.

Investing in the dams and bridges and parks and rural electrification that served 4 generations of Americans and are still paying for themselves every generation to this very day - THAT was "bad" for the economy.

Damns never paid for themselves in terms of real dollars.
Bridges were sub-par, inferior and didn't last very long.
Yeah, FDR spent the equivalent of billions on parks.  So, that I could sit my *** down on a horse for 6 hours looking at beautiful mountains.  Waste of money.  What I learned was that park was just ONE BIG BUM CAMP - where they cut down a bunch of timber 'cuz they had nothing else to do.  Then, they called it a "park".

Paying corporations to build tanks and planes and bombs that were blown up and abandoned all over the world - that was "good" for our economy. 

It was good for my portfolio.  Sucks if you didn't ride that wave.  Well, you've always got your gold Kilo bars. Maybe you can make one into a Gold Dildo and offer it up to Biden's Boy, LL Cool for a "good time".

I can actually SEE the benefits of the TVA, the Hoover Dam, the Bay Bridge, the Blue Ridge Parkway. Explain how blowing up Hiroshima economically benefits America.      

Now, Japan builds cars, TV's, electronics, watches and all kinds of great stuff for us.  See how that works.  Annihilation.  When you annihilate your enemy, the few remaining, helpless, weakened, pathetic people rebuild and become your friends.  I think it's called the Hiroshima Affect, or something like that.
 

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 2:09 pm

Now, is this going to be my "permanent record"?  My FBI file?  My CIA dossier?  Or just Cannonpointer's Commie-White-List record.

That last one, gay. The one you DON'T wanna be on.

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 2:09 pm

Damns never paid for themselves in terms of real dollars.

Four generations of electric customers and the taming of several rivers means more than your *** spew. The TVA and the Hoover Dam have saved many lives, conserved billions of acre feet of water, and generated electricity for tens of millions of american businesses and citizens - stupid.

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 2:09 pm

Bridges were sub-par, inferior and didn't last very long.

There it goes again - *** spew. The Bay Bridge continues to be a money maker and a necessary piece of infrastructure, stupid. Blithely lying about the bridges the greatest generation's parents built just makes you look retar ted.

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 2:09 pm

Yeah, FDR spent the equivalent of billions on parks.  So, that I could sit my *** down on a horse for 6 hours looking at beautiful mountains.  Waste of money.  What I learned was that park was just ONE BIG BUM CAMP - where they cut down a bunch of timber 'cuz they had nothing else to do.  Then, they called it a "park".

You can ignore this part, skans.

For the heterosexuals, google "Big Bend National Park." Google "Great Smokey Mountains National Park." Google "Blue Ridge Parkway National Park." FDR's CCC built almost 900 state and local parks, and another 94 national parks. These are wealth in the bank of America's fruited plain. On top of that, FDR gave America rural electrification - a national grid that entitled repukes have allowed to go to **** 85 years later.

Skans » 25 Sep 2023, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 2:09 pm

Now, Japan builds cars, TV's, electronics, watches and all kinds of great stuff for us.  See how that works.  Annihilation.  When you annihilate your enemy, the few remaining, helpless, weakened, pathetic people rebuild and become your friends.  I think it's called the Hiroshima Affect, or something like that.

Okay - so you are saying that CONQUEST, NOT capitalism, is our economic model? You're REALLY this stupid, you **** fruit?  

Look. There are people who reason by description, and people who reason by prescription. I'm a description man. I build my map BASED ON OBSERVATION OF THE TERRITORY.

You're a prescription boi. You read people you believe are rully rully smart, and then you try to smush the territory into fitting the map you got from reading those people you were stupid enough to trust.

You end up lying about bridges, lying about dams, lying about parks, abandoning your defense of capitalism in order to maintain it. You end up disrespecting a generation that was SO much smarter than you, ya frank burns dip ****. And worst of all, you **** idiot, you end up on Cannonpointer's Commie-White-List record.
 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2023, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2023, 2:52 pm

That last one, gay. The one you DON'T wanna be on.

Whatever.  Robert Kennedy lied on his gun control plans.  And, I'm just making everyone aware of that.  Do you like Heroin Addict Bobby so much that you would hand him over all of your guns?
 
 

Skans » 26 Sep 2023, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2023, 10:47 am

Whatever.  Robert Kennedy lied on his gun control plans.  And, I'm just making everyone aware of that.  Do you like Heroin Addict Bobby so much that you would hand him over all of your guns?

We all know your real problem with him, fruitcake. 

He won't pretend your lab rattery had any dignity or masculine thinking involved in it. 

You broke like a bitch, and he stood like a man. 

Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2023, 2:20 pm

We all know your real problem with him, fruitcake. 

He won't pretend your lab rattery had any dignity or masculine thinking involved in it. 

You broke like a bitch, and he stood like a man.

The fact that Kennedy stands up for the individual freedom for people to determine whether or not they want the Vax is something I put in the Positive column for him.  I know that you want to make it out as though I have some problem with people who choose not to get vaxxed.  I really don't.  But, you, on the other hand, you do have a problem with people who chose to get vaxed.

I am for freedom in that regard.  Clearly you want to dictate to others what they should do as far as vaccines go. But, isn't that always the difference between a freedom loving Republican and a dictatorial Democrat?
 
 

Skans » 26 Sep 2023, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2023, 2:22 pm

The fact that Kennedy stands up for the individual freedom for people to determine whether or not they want the Vax is something I put in the Positive column for him.  I know that you want to make it out as though I have some problem with people who choose not to get vaxxed.  I really don't.  But, you, on the other hand, you do have a problem with people who chose to get vaxed.

I am for freedom in that regard.  Clearly you want to dictate to others what they should do as far as vaccines go. But, isn't that always the difference between a freedom loving Republican and a dictatorial Democrat?

Sure it is, Pook. But the fact that he stood like a man and you folded like a bitch is something that reactivates your deep shame. Little men despise great ones, just as neutered dogs hate and fear nut smell.

Let's face it. He stood like a man. You folded like a scared bitch. And I say that with all due respect.
 
 

Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2023, 2:26 pm

Sure it is, Pook. But the fact that he stood like a man and you folded like a bitch is something that reactivates your deep shame. Little men despise great ones, just as neutered dogs hate and fear nut smell.

Let's face it. He stood like a man. You folded like a scared bitch. And I say that with all due respect.

LOL, that's a wonderful fantasy you wrote there  . 

The fact is, like I said, I'm a one-issue voter.  I vote for Gun Freedom with the party that has a track record of protecting gun owner's rights, and not stealing them.  I just don't care much about what Kennedy thinks of vaccines.  Not an issue I care about.
 

Skans » 26 Sep 2023, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2023, 2:31 pm

LOL, that's a wonderful fantasy you wrote there  . 

The fact is, like I said, I'm a one-issue voter.  I vote for Gun Freedom with the party that has a track record of protecting gun owner's rights, and not stealing them.  I just don't care much about what Kennedy thinks of vaccines.  Not an issue I care about.

Do you mean the party of ron reagan?

The one that has passed mire gun legislation than the part of rfk?      
 

Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2023, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2023, 2:35 pm

Do you mean the party of ron reagan?

The one that has passed mire gun legislation than the part of rfk?    

Clinton passed the Assault Weapon Ban.  And, the new gun ban all of the Democrats keep promising is far far more restrictive than what Clinton passed.

Also, Clinton passed the only law to ever make someone a criminal for owning a semi-auto, full-length shotgun.  Clinton forced me, YES FORCED ME UNDER THREAT OF IMPRISONMENT, to:

• get fingerprinted
• get photographed
• register a USAS-12 with my finger prints and photograph, social security number and other personal information, or go to prison for 10 years and pay a $250,000 fine. 

So, I don't want to hear your **** about what Republicans did.  They didn't do **** to me compared to what the Democrats, particularly Bill Clinton, did to me personally.   
 

Skans » 26 Sep 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2023, 2:40 pm

Clinton forced me, YES FORCED ME UNDER THREAT OF IMPRISONMENT, to:

• get fingerprinted
• get photographed
• register a USAS-12 with my finger prints and photograph, social security number and other personal information, or go to prison for 10 years and pay a $250,000 fine.

For a little bitch who let himself get bullied into taking experimental drugs, this sounds like not much of a big deal, fruitcake. All they had to threaten you with was PAPERWORK!    

Given that you support a fellow who said, "I prefer to take the guns first and do the due process later," I have to take your claims with a grain of salt.   
 

Raygun wasn’t big on AKs

https://youtube.com/shorts/-6PqDY1lq7U? ... g2HK_hzQvR
 

Mrkelly » 26 Sep 2023, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2023, 6:15 pm

Raygun wasn’t big on AKs

https://youtube.com/shorts/-6PqDY1lq7U? ... g2HK_hzQvR

Regan was a Rino.  A former Democrat. But, he did not pass any laws to take guns away from the People.

Also, Regan was commenting only on a full-auto AK-47 a machine gun.  Not semi-auto guns that look like AK's.  Next time, listen to the clip you post, and PAY ATTENTION!
 
 
 

Skans » 27 Sep 2023, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 8:33 am

Regan was a Rino.  A former Democrat. But, he did not pass any laws to take guns away from the People.

Also, Regan was commenting only on a full-auto AK-47 a machine gun.  Not semi-auto guns that look like AK's.  Next time, listen to the clip you post, and PAY ATTENTION!

didnt say he did goober

but when he left officeReagan joined former Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter in a letter published in The Boston Globe that called on Congress to pass a ban on assault weapons.Later, in a letter to Rep. Scott Klug, a Wisconsin Republican, Reagan said the limitations proposed by the Assault Weapon Ban “are absolutely necessary” and that it “must be passed.” Klug voted in favor of the ban.
 

Mrkelly » 27 Sep 2023, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 9:15 am

didnt say he did goober

but when he left officeReagan joined former Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter in a letter published

Well, I don't know anything about that, Smarmy.  You didn't post that.  You posted a clip of Regan talking about AK-47 machine guns. And, that was what I was replying to.