Liberal Forum

Neo » 28 Sep 2023, 10:41 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Sep 2023, 10:41 pm

Building would have had to have been rigged on the exact same floors the planes crashed into. The explosives would have had to been undamaged and intact after the impact. That removes the use of most conventional explosives, which would have been melted and neutralized by the fires. Also would have required piloting skills not held by any of the hijackers.  So fantastic (see non existent) explosives were used and the planes weren't flown by inexperienced terrorists.

None of that is actually true. It's barely even truthy.

Neo » 28 Sep 2023, 10:41 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Sep 2023, 10:41 pm

Simple answer is better. Angry Muslims attacked some buildings.

The simple answer has a thousand holes in it. The fake implosion of tower 7 after it was "pulled;" the infamous dancing jews; the fact that the owner doubled his insurance against a terrorist attack mere days before the terrorist attack - there are all kinds of holes in the propaganda explanation. Then there are the hundreds of engineers who insist that jet fuel does not burn hot enough to burn steel - and the fact that THREE buildings fell in their own footprints, just like a controlled demolition would do and a jet collision would not.

Then there is the most secure building in the country getting hit by a plane and not one (1) photo of the **** thing. Give us a break. That is not simply lacking credibility. It's lacking possibility.

I will just say this. If the twin towers collapsed as they did from being struck by jets and tower 7 collapsed as it did from PTSD, then we need to indict everyone involved in the demolitions industry for fraud. Pretty much any **** thing you do is gonna make buildings collapse in their own footprints. Hit them with a jet on this floor at that angle, or on that floor at this angle, or just hit the **** building NEXT to them. They're gonna collapse in their own footprint, pretty much whatever you do.

So these fake "experts" are running a grift. I'll wager Trump is involved. Anything THAT shady, he has a paw in it. 
 

Neo » 28 Sep 2023, 10:41 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Sep 2023, 10:41 pm

Simple answer is better. Angry Muslims attacked some buildings.

Do you have a simple answer why there are no pictures of a plane hitting the Pentagon?

 



 

Sumela » 28 Sep 2023, 10:44 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Sep 2023, 10:44 pm

why were they angry??

Turn your way-back machine to 10,000 years ago for that answer.

Z09 » 29 Sep 2023, 6:01 am » wrote: ↑

29 Sep 2023, 6:01 am

I should also point out about 100 witnesses saw a low flying American Airlines plane a few seconds before the crash...
The plane even hit a light tower that fell onto a taxi.
Moments later a huge explosion and everyone on that plane was never heard from again.

Norad and ATC never reported a plane flying across country and landing in Nevada at Area 51.

It's friggin dumb.

​​​​​​I don't think a missile was sent from a submarine or military base either.
That's rather hilarious too.

I should point out that a half dozen witnesses saw you say that Building7 was hit by a missile from area51..

You think that proves anything?

 


 

Jantje_Smit » 29 Sep 2023, 3:29 am » wrote: ↑

29 Sep 2023, 3:29 am

Do you have a simple answer why there are no pictures of a plane hitting the Pentagon?

 

A Plane or plane like object hit the pentagon at hundreds of miles per hour. Thousands of witnesses saw it flying low at high speed, cutting down dozens of street lights in its path. So it was either a plane of similar type as one seen take off by friends and family that hit the building or it was something that looked like a 747. Simplest answer is it was one of the missing flights. The pentagon has far more cameras inside than out. Hubris, we believed no one would dare attack the building. I am sure it could have been a cruise missile in drag or some kind of hologram coordinated with pyrotechnics. Transvestite cruise missile in 747 drag. 
 

Neo » 29 Sep 2023, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑

29 Sep 2023, 6:45 am

A Plane or plane like object hit the pentagon at hundreds of miles per hour. Thousands of witnesses saw it flying low at high speed, cutting down dozens of street lights in its path. So it was either a plane of similar type as one seen take off by friends and family that hit the building or it was something that looked like a 747. Simplest answer is it was one of the missing flights. The pentagon has far more cameras inside than out. Hubris, we believed no one would dare attack the building. I am sure it could have been a cruise missile in drag or some kind of hologram coordinated with pyrotechnics. Transvestite cruise missile in 747 drag.

That's not an answer to the question I asked, it's a simple question, how come you don't have a simple answer?

 


 
 

Jantje_Smit » 29 Sep 2023, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

29 Sep 2023, 6:54 am

That's not an answer to the question I asked, it's a simple question, how come you don't have a simple answer?

 

Simple answer, a plane hit the building at a speed fast enough that the cameras didn't get a clear picture. 
 

Neo » 29 Sep 2023, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑

29 Sep 2023, 7:27 am

Simple answer, a plane hit the building at a speed fast enough that the cameras didn't get a clear picture.

Right, one frame a second....

I suppose I could ask how those thousands of witnesses didn't have a problem clearly seeing a plane in that case but let's not go there..

 




 

RebelGator » 29 Sep 2023, 5:42 am » wrote: ↑

29 Sep 2023, 5:42 am

Turn your way-back machine to 10,000 years ago for that answer.

What?!   

The West has been bombing them, murdering their children,
stealing their land, and stealing their oil/gas for 10,000 years!?

OMG.  I thought it was only the last 100 years.  My bad  

Neo » 28 Sep 2023, 11:14 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Sep 2023, 11:14 pm

We had American military next to their unholy meteorite in Saudi.

Oh **** - my bad.  I thought maybe it was cuz The West had been 

bombing them and stealing from them for decades.

Sanctions, regime change wars, constant meddling....

Trumpystein...""we took the oil""
 

Sumela » 29 Sep 2023, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

29 Sep 2023, 8:14 am

Oh **** - my bad.  I thought maybe it was cuz The West had been 

bombing them and stealing from them for decades.

Sanctions, regime change wars, constant meddling....

Trumpystein...""we took the oil""

Bin laden primary complaint was US troops on Islamic holy ground. I am sure he had other complaints but that seems to have been the trigger. 
 

Neo » 29 Sep 2023, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑

29 Sep 2023, 8:17 am

Bin laden primary complaint was US troops on Islamic holy ground. I am sure he had other complaints but that seems to have been the trigger.

I love the part where Reagan Admin funded and trained he and his crew in the 80s, made many promises, and then 
they disappeared....and popped back up in a big fkg way.  Yikes.  More failed UksePHsunalJIzm  

Z09 » 29 Sep 2023, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑

29 Sep 2023, 8:15 am

Can you give us some examples where we stole land and oil?

I just did, you old neocon burnout  
 

Z09 » 29 Sep 2023, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

29 Sep 2023, 8:12 am

What land have we've stolen?
What oil have we've stolen?

East Syria....read a book bitch.  Pay attn retard.

Trumpenstein...""we took the oil"""
 

Z09 » 29 Sep 2023, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

29 Sep 2023, 8:22 am

Can you repost it?

Can't find it..

Show us where we stole land and oil...

Id rather show you Murican trannies fleeing Afghan

goat herders.  After taking *** whippings.  


 
 

Z09 » 29 Sep 2023, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑

29 Sep 2023, 8:24 am

So we stole land in East Syria and we're getting oil there?

According to Trumpy.  Yer King


 

Z09 » 29 Sep 2023, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

29 Sep 2023, 8:27 am

I think you need to do alittle research and maybe you won't make a fool out of yourself as quickly...

Does the U.S. own oil in Syria?
After DCE's license, from the Office of Foreign Assets Control, to operate became public last August, the State Department issued a statement in which it underscored that the “United States government does not own, control, or manage the oil resources in Syria.”

^^^^^  
Quoting WASH DC bureaucrats.  THE SWAMP.    

 

Z09 » 29 Sep 2023, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑

29 Sep 2023, 8:05 am

I never said a missile hit Building 7
That's a lie.. 

So all the witnesses are lying?

However, I can show YOUR quotes saying the plane that hit the Pentagon might have been sent to Area 51
And the missile was shot from a military base or submarine?

Are you serious?

That's just dumb

No it isn't, the missile must have come from somewhere, a military base or submarine is a logical option, where do you think it came from, area51?

 
 

Z09 » 29 Sep 2023, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

29 Sep 2023, 8:35 am

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gh1YHtRZUts

Stick yer propaganda video

up yer *** old man.

In Trumpy I Trust, he has never told a lie...he said...""WE TOOK THE OIL, WE LEFT TROOPS ONLY FOR THE OIL"""
 

Sumela » 29 Sep 2023, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑

29 Sep 2023, 8:19 am

I love the part where Reagan Admin funded and trained he and his crew in the 80s, made many promises, and then 
they disappeared....and popped back up in a big fkg way.  Yikes.  More failed UksePHsunalJIzm

I liked when Rambo went to Afghanistan and joined them in killing Russians.