Where are the photos of the plane hitting the pentagon?Z09 » 30 Sep 2023, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑ https://abcnews.go.com/US/photos/fbi-re ... e-46490818
Open up the link...
You'll see debris of the plane..
Of course on this very site we were told trucks dumped plane parts there right after the crash so the phony FBI agents would find them...
Yeah...That's believable too....
viewtopic.php?p=2394353#p2394353
So why do you keep yammering?Z09 » 30 Sep 2023, 6:30 pm » wrote: ↑ We both know there's no clear footage of the plane ...
Just a silver streak and an explosion..
We both equally know this is literally impossible - if there were a plane.Z09 » 30 Sep 2023, 6:30 pm » wrote: ↑ We both know there's no clear footage of the plane ...
Just a silver streak and an explosion..
So you have no intention of showing the footage - YOU CANNOT EVEN FIND THE FOOTAGE YOU SAY EXISTS.Z09 » 30 Sep 2023, 6:30 pm » wrote: ↑ We both know there's no clear footage of the plane ...
Just a silver streak and an explosion..
Show it, fruitcake.
Define "secured," you poor little thing.Z09 » 30 Sep 2023, 7:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Remarkable how air plane debris showed up at a crash site that was secured..
I'm pretty sure I pointed it out before but consider the words of your witness I made bold and then answer the question...Z09 » 30 Sep 2023, 6:14 pm » wrote: ↑
"I just looked up and, you know, a plane was flying directly at us," he said.
He said it was just 10 to 15 seconds before the plane hit the building.
"I just couldn't believe something that big could be flying that low and flying directly at us," he reiterated.

You need to get the story straight, the phoney FBI agents dropped the parts so the real ones could 'discover' them...Z09 » 01 Oct 2023, 5:39 am » wrote: ↑ So ....
Phony plane parts are brought to the crash so phony FBI agents can discover them and pass on the narrative that a plane crashed there and not a missile?
And no one noticed this at a site that had hundreds of reporters there as well as all kinds of law enforcement from different agencies?
Yeah...
That's believable too..
So on a morning that hundreds of people raced to the Pentagon including the media and film crews, no one noticed a truck pulling up to the building and dropping plane parts around the crash site....
And that's what Jantje wants us to believe......!
Not trucks, truck.. and they didn't need a big one, maybe it came out of the trunk of that taxi they used for the lighting pole pics, that cab driver was in on the scam too...Z09 » 01 Oct 2023, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑ So...
The phony FBI agents dropped the plane parts....
So they were driving trucks that day and no one noticed plane parts being DELIVERED to the Pentagon???
Ok
What engine would that be, you think this wouldn't fit in the trunk of a taxi?


Ok, maybe they needed two taxis..
There should be scorch marks because of the intense heat ( 4080°F) of the Explosion fuielled by the Jet fuel and the Proximity of the "C" on the fuselage ....NO?
Well, I want to here your "maybe not" theory .....
What they saw was a mock up of a plane employing predator drone technology to remotely steer the mock up......Z09 » 30 Sep 2023, 6:30 pm » wrote: ↑ We both know there's no clear footage of the plane ...
Just a silver streak and an explosion..
However, after considering the witnesses, dead bodies, missing passengers, missing plane and DNA of passengers on the plane I've shaped an opinion.
You disagree and I'm trying to respect that.
But if you had witnesses that claim they saw a missile I might be swayed.
But nobody has ever claimed that.
If 100 witnesses say they saw a plane...
....why can't just a couple say it was a missile?
Because most hit the ground and cause an impact crater which creates a whole lot of earth beIng disturbed which acts like a fire suppression device ....Z09 » 01 Oct 2023, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Every plane that crashes doesn't necessarily gets 100% burnt ...
The impact itself...
Same thing with a car crash..
I attack you personally because I am weak - not because my argument is.Z09 » 01 Oct 2023, 5:25 am » wrote: ↑ You have no argument.
Instead you just attack me personally...
The people pushing the narrative put it there.
I am not here to argue any position you assign to Jantje - even had I NOT already seen you assign a straw man position to him, you **** cow.Z09 » 01 Oct 2023, 5:25 am » wrote: ↑ Jantje mentioned it was trucked in right after the crash.
So truck drivers brought plane debris TO the crash site?
Who told you that, fruitcake? Can you prove your claim? Who drove the car?Z09 » 01 Oct 2023, 6:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Funny...
A compact car delivered phony plane parts to crash site...
And who told you THAT, fruity? You just make **** up on the fly.Z09 » 01 Oct 2023, 6:54 pm » wrote: ↑ And of course with hundreds of film crews and numerous security personal no on saw anything?
You are the only one telling faerie tales, fruitcake. I'm just asking questions about the rather preposterous and ever changing narrative.Z09 » 01 Oct 2023, 6:54 pm » wrote: ↑ I suppose the phony FBI agents told the 100 phony witnesses to keep the film crews busy while the compact car dropped off phony parts ...
Wonder what happened to the plane that left Dulles that AM?
Take care Canon..
I hope you pass on your silly fairy tale to some high school kids
Are you having a sale, fruity?
Like a missile? Really?
You've never shown it. You just keep running your vacuous head about it.
The hundred you made up, fruity?Z09 » 01 Oct 2023, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑ The 100 people that witnessed the plane ...
Are they all lying?
The only one running a narrative is you, fruitcake. You run from questions. And it's easy to see why.
Please re-ask any question you say I have ducked.
I've made no such claim. I have questioned your rather silly and indefensible narrative, while you have attacked my right to do so and ascribed straw man positions to me.
The taxi driver's testimony is preposterous. It's been utterly discredited. The fact that you cling to such a witness puts your other witnesses in question.
I strongly doubt any large percentage said any such thing. People do not take note of the airline when they see a jet in the sky - ESPECIALLY if it is flying low on the way to crashing. Such an event - IF IT HAPPENED AT ALL - would be extremely traumatic for any observer. YOUR GLIB, UNSOURCED ASSURANCES that every one of these witness - each and all, a hundred people - took the time to notice the insignia of the airline that owned the plane which suddenly and terrifyingly appeared just above their heads as they milled aimlessly about in the near vicinity of the pentagon i silly. Just absolutely silly. ALL HUNDRED WITNESSES said, "It was an American Airlines plane - or at least, not Braniff, so help me God?" You're **** drunk. You're making **** up.Z09 » 01 Oct 2023, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑ 100 witnesses that didn't even know each testifying they saw an American Airlines plane flying close to the ground moments before a crash .
All lying?
YOU are the one who ran your mouth about video of a missile - not me.