Liberal Forum

Z09 » 27 Sep 2023, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 11:39 am

I never said any such thing

 

More lies. ^^^

Believe what you wish to believe. No skin off my nose.

sootedupCyndi » 27 Sep 2023, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 11:31 am

Exactly what i thought.
Then hearing about building 7- They were very QUIET about that!
I'm thinking HUH??? Oklahoma City was another one!

The Structural Engineer was allowed by the [[[JWO controlled MSM]]] to pass on a rapidly cooked up narrative that was based on several gross assumptons and all out guesses..as to how the theoretical "stored energy" of the collapsing upper floors was able to continue to "snowball" with just enough force to make all of the concrete encased beams, girders and columns collapse in unison.
At no time was this explanation presented to the GOYIM MASSES as just a theory..it was presented as fact.
 

OdeToJoy » 26 Sep 2023, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2023, 4:54 pm

your *** imploded from too much dick 

Problem I have with 911 conspiracies is the amount of faith they require for a large number of individuals to act with perfect coordination in full view of the public. Never a whistle blower, never new information. Never a crewmember or passenger ever turning up.

If building 7 was a controlled demolition then so were the twin towers. The second plane hitting the towers was watched by hundreds of millions of people in real time from different angles. For wtc 7 to be a controlled demolition, this second tower strike had to be a coordinated airshow of some sort performed for a live global audience of hundreds of millions. David Copperfield couldn't pull that off in his prime.

That is not to say unsavory characters didn't take full advantage of the attack to capitalize, but the attack itself wasn't staged. No part of it. One has to be Corkey level retarded to believe otherwise.
 

Vegas » 27 Sep 2023, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 11:35 am

@Z09  thinks a missile from Area 51 hit it. 

I remember 
 

Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 2:12 pm

Problem I have with 911 conspiracies is the amount of faith they require for a large number of individuals to act with perfect coordination in full view of the public. Never a whistle blower, never new information. Never a crewmember or passenger ever turning up.

If building 7 was a controlled demolition then so were the twin towers. The second plane hitting the towers was watched by hundreds of millions of people in real time from different angles. For wtc 7 to be a controlled demolition, this second tower strike had to be a coordinated airshow of some sort performed for a live global audience of hundreds of millions. David Copperfield couldn't pull that off in his prime.

That is not to say unsavory characters didn't take full advantage of the attack to capitalize, but the attack itself wasn't staged. No part of it. One has to be Corkey level retarded to believe otherwise.

Many pilots and engineers have come forward and expressed their doubts about the formal report of 9/11. They gave pretty compelling reasons as to why the report is false. Engineers have given multiple reasons as to how a demolition would be more probably than the floors just buckling. 

Z09 » 27 Sep 2023, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 2:39 pm

Vegas:
It would make more sense. The hole in the pentagon looks like a missile could have done that, not a 747, it was too small. The bodies found could be the staff.

Believes building 7 was hit by a missile from Area 51 ^^^

Vegas » 27 Sep 2023, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 2:30 pm

Many pilots and engineers have come forward and expressed their doubts about the formal report of 9/11. They gave pretty compelling reasons as to why the report is false. Engineers have given multiple reasons as to how a demolition would be more probably than the floors just buckling.

Controlled demolition makes the most sense....if you spend weeks/months preparing a building for a controlled demolition. Buildings that size would require thousands of tonnes of support structures removed. Ever seen a tour of a building about to be demolished? No one could take their Starbucks to the 79th floor of one of these buildings and not clearly see something wrong. That would have to be seeing something wrong for months without reporting it.  

it's a **** distraction. You and people like you get real questions ignored. "Who profited from 911?" And other valid lines of inquiry are quashed with guilt by association. "Yer one of those idiots that believe the government controlled demolished, ain't ya?"

Plenty of real conspiracies to investigate, controlled demolition of skyscrapers isn't one. 

Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 3:24 pm

Controlled demolition makes the most sense....if you spend weeks/months preparing a building for a controlled demolition. Buildings that size would require thousands of tonnes of support structures removed. Ever seen a tour of a building about to be demolished? No one could take their Starbucks to the 79th floor of one of these buildings and not clearly see something wrong. That would have to be seeing something wrong for months without reporting it.  

it's a **** distraction. You and people like you get real questions ignored. "Who profited from 911?" And other valid lines of inquiry are quashed with guilt by association. "Yer one of those idiots that believe the government controlled demolished, ain't ya?"

Plenty of real conspiracies to investigate, controlled demolition of skyscrapers isn't one.

I call ****. You know less about demolition that you do about ****** - and you ain't had ****** since a ****** had you.

Plenty of REAL experts have disagreed with you - and then there was the indisputable FACT that the BBC **** up and read their script 20 minutes before the **** thing imploded.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M26-B44qQIs

Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 3:24 pm

Controlled demolition makes the most sense....if you spend weeks/months preparing a building for a controlled demolition. Buildings that size would require thousands of tonnes of support structures removed. Ever seen a tour of a building about to be demolished? No one could take their Starbucks to the 79th floor of one of these buildings and not clearly see something wrong. That would have to be seeing something wrong for months without reporting it.  

it's a **** distraction. You and people like you get real questions ignored. "Who profited from 911?" And other valid lines of inquiry are quashed with guilt by association. "Yer one of those idiots that believe the government controlled demolished, ain't ya?"

Plenty of real conspiracies to investigate, controlled demolition of skyscrapers isn't one.

They didn't need to make it controlled. They just needed to bring it down.  And it's not hard to miss things. I have worked in different buildings with remodeling going on. Day after day they were doing some kind of construction work. None of us cared to get the details, nor did we care to stand around and watch them. We had our own job to do. We received an email saying that on such and such a date through such and such a date, there will be remodeling going on. Please park in the other lot and take another elevator. That was it. We didn't need to know the details. Why would we care? There easily could have been construction going on during working hours. Nobody is going to question it. 

Cannonpointer » 27 Sep 2023, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 3:30 pm

I call ****. You know less about demolition that you do about ****** - and you ain't had ****** since a ****** had you.


 

   
 

Vegas » 27 Sep 2023, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 3:30 pm

They didn't need to make it controlled. They just needed to bring it down.  And it's not hard to miss things. I have worked in different buildings with remodeling going on. Day after day they were doing some kind of construction work. None of us cared to get the details, nor did we care to stand around and watch them. We had our own job to do. We received an email saying that on such and such a date through such and such a date, there will be remodeling going on. Please park in the other lot and take another elevator. That was it. We didn't need to know the details. Why would we care? There easily could have been construction going on during working hours. Nobody is going to question it.

Perhaps they wouldn't question it before the demolition but they sure as **** would afterwards. It would start with "gee Harvey, it was kinda weird the elevator wouldn't stop on 75-78" and develop into an investigation. Tons of load bearing structures would have to be removed before det cord installation would do anything. 

Sorry it's retarded to believe 911 was a controlled demolition.  Like **** Biden drool stupid. 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 27 Sep 2023, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 3:30 pm

I call ****. You know less about demolition that you do about ****** - and you ain't had ****** since a ****** had you.

Plenty of REAL experts have disagreed with you - and then there was the indisputable FACT that the BBC **** up and read their script 20 minutes before the **** thing imploded.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M26-B44qQIs

Timezone issue likely explanation of "damning" prediction by British news talking about wtc7. Wasn't a prediction, it had already happened. Hadn't seen that bit o clip before but seems like that explanation is plausible.  That report was filmed after wtc7 fell. 
 

Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 3:35 pm

Perhaps they wouldn't question it before the demolition but they sure as **** would afterwards. It would start with "gee Harvey, it was kinda weird the elevator wouldn't stop on 75-78" and develop into an investigation. Tons of load bearing structures would have to be removed before det cord installation would do anything. 

Sorry it's retarded to believe 911 was a controlled demolition.  Like **** Biden drool stupid.

They did and still are questioning it. 

Vegas » 27 Sep 2023, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 3:44 pm

They did and still are questioning it.

911 truthers smell like special Olympics winners. 
 

Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 3:46 pm

911 truthers smell like special Olympics winners.

Or you can try to debunk it. 

Vegas » 27 Sep 2023, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 3:53 pm

Or you can try to debunk it.

The thing about the special Olympics is win, lose, or place, you are still retarded. Wtc buildings were not felled by controlled demolition. 
 

What happened to all dem peoples in the plane?

Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 3:57 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 3:57 pm

The thing about the special Olympics is win, lose, or place, you are still retarded. Wtc buildings were not felled by controlled demolition.

And regardless if someone is retarded or not, the truth remains the same. If a retard says 2 + 2 = 4, does that all of sudden mean 2 + 2 does not equal 4 because a retard said it?