Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
And here we go: 9/11, Building 7 was imploded. Change my mind.
And here we go: 9/11, Building 7 was imploded. Change my mind.
By Vegas
26 Sep 2023 4:02 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
27 Sep 2023 4:00 pm
What do you mean?
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
27 Sep 2023 4:02 pm
The passengers.
[https://i.imgflip.com/9z0a87.jpg][/img]
27 Sep 2023 4:03 pm
Well...I assumed they died. It would be a little hard to survive that. Lol.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
27 Sep 2023 4:06 pm
Vegas » 27 Sep 2023, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Well...I assumed they died. It would be a little hard to survive that. Lol.
I hear people elsewhere saying they're being held incommunicado.
[https://i.imgflip.com/9z0a87.jpg][/img]
27 Sep 2023 4:07 pm
What's so hard to believe that the towers could have been sabotaged with remote controlled explosives as well as struck by the planes...?Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Problem I have with 911 conspiracies is the amount of faith they require for a large number of individuals to act with perfect coordination in full view of the public. Never a whistle blower, never new information. Never a crewmember or passenger ever turning up.
If building 7 was a controlled demolition then so were the twin towers. The second plane hitting the towers was watched by hundreds of millions of people in real time from different angles. For wtc 7 to be a controlled demolition, this second tower strike had to be a coordinated airshow of some sort performed for a live global audience of hundreds of millions. David Copperfield couldn't pull that off in his prime.
That is not to say unsavory characters didn't take full advantage of the attack to capitalize, but the attack itself wasn't staged. No part of it. One has to be Corkey level retarded to believe otherwise.
Office buildings are in a constant state of upheaval with new tenants having entire floors remodeled.
A Telecom Contractor could make the installation undetected..all the way back to the server closet.
One guy.. coming in at any time of the day could get all the main columns wired up ..in most cases without running any new cable. There's always plenty of spare cables to latch onto that go straight from point A to point Z.
27 Sep 2023 4:09 pm
LincolnNebraska » 27 Sep 2023, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑ I hear people elsewhere saying they're being held incommunicado.
Maybe at Epstein's Island.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
27 Sep 2023 4:09 pm
27 Sep 2023 4:11 pm
GHETTOBLASTER » 27 Sep 2023, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑ What's so hard to believe that the towers could have been sabotaged with remote controlled explosives as well as struck by the planes...?
Office buildings are in a constant state of upheaval with new tenants having entire floors remodeled.
A Telecom Contractor could make the installation undetected..all the way back to the server closet.
One guy.. coming in at any time of the day could get all the main columns wired up ..in most cases without running any new cable. There's always plenty of spare cables to latch onto that go straight from point A to point Z.
Exactly. Employees have their own work to do. If they are told that construction and remodeling is going on, then they adjust. They don't sit around and question the construction workers or wonder if there is something nefarious going on.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
27 Sep 2023 4:12 pm
Appeal to retard logical fallacy!!Vegas » 27 Sep 2023, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑ And regardless if someone is retarded or not, the truth remains the same. If a retard says 2 + 2 = 4, does that all of sudden mean 2 + 2 does not equal 4 because a retard said it?
Absolutely true though, if Hitler says the sky is translucent we can't deny that truth because Hitler said it. My criticism of truthers claims goes beyond impeachment of them as people. Has nothing to do with them personally. I have close friends that believe it was staged. They stopped talking to me about it because we reached obvious impasses they couldn't refute. Obvious being if wtc 7 was a controlled demolition then they all had to be. No evidence that any of them were and plenty of evidence they could not have been planned demolitions coordinated with an air show watched in real time by hundreds of millions. It's a dumb notion.
27 Sep 2023 4:14 pm
Your faith in government is remarkable. A controlled demolition with an accompanying airshow? Better bow down and suck that Jewish cock because, if they pulled that off, they are indeed protected by Satan. They are the masters of this world. Chatting about this in public, even on a supposedly anonymous chat forum, is taking your life into your hands.GHETTOBLASTER » 27 Sep 2023, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑ What's so hard to believe that the towers could have been sabotaged with remote controlled explosives as well as struck by the planes...?
Office buildings are in a constant state of upheaval with new tenants having entire floors remodeled.
A Telecom Contractor could make the installation undetected..all the way back to the server closet.
One guy.. coming in at any time of the day could get all the main columns wired up ..in most cases without running any new cable. There's always plenty of spare cables to latch onto that go straight from point A to point Z.
27 Sep 2023 4:14 pm
And why would it be difficult to believe that the towers were imploded as well. They fell like an implosion, just like building 7.Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Obvious being if wtc 7 was a controlled demolition then they all had to be. No evidence that any of them were and plenty of evidence they could not have been planned demolitions coordinated with an air show watched in real time by hundreds of millions. It's a dumb notion.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
27 Sep 2023 4:16 pm
Can you give us one reason why that would be nearly impossible? Demolitions happen all the time around the globe.Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Your faith in government is remarkable. A controlled demolition with an accompanying airshow?
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
27 Sep 2023 4:18 pm
All those examples around the globe took months of planning and were known to the public before the events. Tell me about all the demolitions that happened without public knowledge. That three/four buildings were prepared covertly.Vegas » 27 Sep 2023, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Can you give us one reason why that would be nearly impossible? Demolitions happen all the time around the globe.
27 Sep 2023 4:28 pm
Nice try.Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Timezone issue likely explanation of "damning" prediction by British news talking about wtc7. Wasn't a prediction, it had already happened. Hadn't seen that bit o clip before but seems like that explanation is plausible. That report was filmed after wtc7 fell.
At the time they reported it, the building was still standing. That is a fact.
Got anything else?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
27 Sep 2023 4:34 pm
There is your smoking gun. If true, it's not an easily explained misinterpretation of "pull it" made at a later date. Why is this the first time I heard this claim? My guess is, this report was made shortly after wt7 collapsed. If that is not the case ICannonpointer » 27 Sep 2023, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Nice try.
At the time they reported it, the building was still standing. That is a fact.
Got anything else?
I have no explanation for it.
27 Sep 2023 4:36 pm
You were not paying attention.Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 4:34 pm » wrote: ↑ There is your smoking gun. If true, it's not an easily explained misinterpretation of "pull it" made at a later date. Why is this the first time I heard this claim? My guess is, this report was made shortly after wt7 collapsed. If that is not the case I
I have no explanation for it.
I brought it to the board's attention more than once.
On account of yes - it is a **** smoking gun. One of several, but enough of one that I hammered it home repeatedly, back when this subject was a hot putayda.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
27 Sep 2023 4:37 pm
It was live reportage, and you can watch, in the clip I gave you, the building do as she described, after she described it.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
27 Sep 2023 4:39 pm
Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑ All those examples around the globe took months of planning and were known to the public before the events. Tell me about all the demolitions that happened without public knowledge. That three/four buildings were prepared covertly.
I already told you. I gave you the reality of how everyday remodeling and construction happens. Employees see the crews working and drilling, but why would they ask questions? They have their own work to do. Usually, they just see that the place is being remodeled...okay. So? That happens daily everywhere. When was the last time you saw a road construction crew and wondered if they were actually planting explosives underground? It doesn't happen. You see road construction crews, so you safely assume they are doing road construction, then you move on with your day. It's not hard.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
27 Sep 2023 4:41 pm
We don't know there isn't thermite in a paint can out there.Vegas » 27 Sep 2023, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑ I already told you. I gave you the reality of how everyday remodeling and construction happens. Employees see the crews working and drilling, but why would they ask questions? They have their own work to do. Usually, they just see that the place is being remodeled...okay. So? That happens daily everywhere. When was the last time you saw a road construction crew and wondered if they were actually planting explosives underground? It doesn't happen. You see road construction crews, so you safely assume they are doing road construction, then you move on with your day. It's not hard.
They've had aquatic cars with bulletproof windscreens and machinegun headlamps since the 60s.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
27 Sep 2023 4:41 pm
If true, it's buried in easily discounted ****. Not one of the myriad of claims I have given due diligence to. Advanced knowledge to an unprecedented event is pretty damning. The building was on fire and the rescue teams had been pulled. Reporting that it collapsed before it had.... i have no explanation for that.Cannonpointer » 27 Sep 2023, 4:36 pm » wrote: ↑ You were not paying attention.
I brought it to the board's attention more than once.
On account of yes - it is a **** smoking gun. One of several, but enough of one that I hammered it home repeatedly, back when this subject was a hot putayda.
Who is online
In total there are 4767 users online :: 17 registered, 14 bots, and 4736 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, FJB, Beekeeper, LowIQTrash, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: Mediatoolkitbot, Bolt, DuckDuckBot, MicroMessenger, proximic, CriteoBot, ADmantX, YandexBot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, bingbot