Liberal Forum

Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 4:41 pm

If true, it's buried in easily discounted ****.  Not one of the myriad of claims I have given due diligence to. Advanced knowledge to an unprecedented event is pretty damning. The building was on fire and the rescue teams had been pulled. Reporting that it collapsed before it had.... i have no explanation for that.

No ****. Google the sinking of the maine. Now, THAT one was given away by time zones. 

And if you want to read a BLUEPRINT for 9-11, google Operation Northwoods. If showing you the plan isn't enough, I rather doubt enough exists. 
 

Vegas » 27 Sep 2023, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 4:39 pm

I already told you. I gave you the reality of how everyday remodeling and construction happens. Employees see the crews working and drilling, but why would they ask questions? They have their own work to do. Usually, they just see that the place is being remodeled...okay. So? That happens daily everywhere. When was the last time you saw a road construction crew and wondered if they were actually planting explosives underground? It doesn't happen. You see road construction crews, so you safely assume they are doing road construction, then you move on with your day. It's not hard.

Hundreds of tons of load Bearing structures removed before demolition. Not feasible for that to go unnoticed before or certainly after the events. 
 

Cannonpointer » 27 Sep 2023, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 4:42 pm

No ****. Google the sinking of the maine. Now, THAT one was given away by time zones. 

And if you want to read a BLUEPRINT for 9-11, google Operation Northwoods. If showing you the plan isn't enough, I rather doubt enough exists.

Still think it was timezone and you have been misinformed. 
 

Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm

Hundreds of tons of load Bearing structures removed before demolition. Not feasible for that to go unnoticed before or certainly after the events.

Nope. Not true. It didn't need to be controlled. It just needed to fall. 

Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 4:44 pm

Still think it was timezone and you have been misinformed.

You sound suicidal.   
 

Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 4:44 pm

Still think it was timezone and you have been misinformed.

Well, you can actually watch her talk about it. Then you can watch what she described happen, right behind her. I'm not sure you you explain that away by time zones, in your cosmology. 
 

Cannonpointer » 27 Sep 2023, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 4:42 pm

No ****. Google the sinking of the maine. Now, THAT one was given away by time zones. 

And if you want to read a BLUEPRINT for 9-11, google Operation Northwoods. If showing you the plan isn't enough, I rather doubt enough exists.

Northwoods led to the gulf of Tonkin and Iraqi wmds. Reichstag proved wildly successful for Hitler, not surprising we would adopt it. 

My dispute with 911 truthers has nothing to do with the naive belief our government would never do anything evil. I doubt their competency to pull off 911 as a false flag. 
 

Cannonpointer » 27 Sep 2023, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 4:47 pm

Well, you can actually watch her talk about it. Then you can watch what she described happen, right behind her. I'm not sure you you explain that away by time zones, in your cosmology.

Her focus and notes were on the two main buildings that fell. She strangely never said anything about wtc7. Her comments were focused on the towers. 
 

Vegas » 27 Sep 2023, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 4:45 pm

Nope. Not true. It didn't need to be controlled. It just needed to fall.

Needed to fall after an airshow witnessed by hundreds of millions. Not plausible. If I believed it were true and those in control were capable of such a perfect deception, the last thing I would do would be to post about it on a pseudo anonymous political discussion forum. Your actions don't seem to be those of one that really believes the conspiracy narrative.
 

Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 4:51 pm

Her focus and notes were on the two main buildings that fell. She strangely never said anything about wtc7. Her comments were focused on the towers.

I don't know what video you watched. In the clip I provided you, the other towers had been down for hours. She was referring exclusively to tower 7.
 
It would make more sense for you to claim they lied about being live and were using a loop. It's just retarded to say she was not talking about tower 7, when it was the ONLY SUBJECT OF THE CLIP.
 

Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 4:51 pm

Her focus and notes were on the two main buildings that fell. She strangely never said anything about wtc7. Her comments were focused on the towers.

really?

she was asked directly about and and said “this isn’t the first building”

https://youtu.be/VnHP4OxbcbI?si=pwwObr7NsZh8a7wO
 
 

Mrkelly » 27 Sep 2023, 5:07 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 5:07 pm

really?

she was asked directly about and and said “this isn’t the first building”


 

No, it was the second.  Wtc7 would be the third. If this broadcast happened before wtc 7 collapsed that would be extraordinary evidence. This is not a claim I have seen regularly made and most obvious explanation is that it was made after the wtc7 collapse. 

Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 5:10 pm

No, it was the second.  Wtc7 would be the third. If this broadcast happened before wtc 7 collapsed that would be extraordinary evidence. This is not a claim I have seen regularly made and most obvious explanation is that it was made after the wtc7 collapse.

the building is right behind her

and yes, she was asked directly about “the salmon building”

Mrkelly » 27 Sep 2023, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 5:12 pm

the building is right behind her

and yes, she was asked directly about “the salmon building”

Her responses were focused on the twin towers. Questions were certainly salmon building related but her answers weren't. Assuming this was filmed shortly after wt7 collapsed. Building behind her may have been misidentified at wtc7. 
 
 

Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 5:16 pm

Her responses were focused on the twin towers. Questions were certainly salmon building related but her answers weren't. Assuming this was filmed shortly after wt7 collapsed. Building behind her may have been misidentified at wtc7.

no

this is from a website that debunks WT7 conspiracy theories 

Another major red flag in the eyes of conspiracy theorists is the fact that the BBC reported the collapse of Building 7 almost half an hour before it actually fell. This is a verifiable fact: footage can still be watched on YouTube of BBC journalist Jane Standley discussing the building’s destruction while it can be seen standing in the backdrop.

https://www.history.co.uk/articles/buil ... s-debunked

they confirmed this, and went on to debunk it anyway 

look, I went through a **** of these conversations 20+ years ago

I’m out

carry on
 

Cannonpointer » 27 Sep 2023, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 5:02 pm

I don't know what video you watched. In the clip I provided you, the other towers had been down for hours. She was referring exclusively to tower 7.
 
It would make more sense for you to claim they lied about being live and were using a loop. It's just retarded to say she was not talking about tower 7, when it was the ONLY SUBJECT OF THE CLIP.

Bbc got advanced intelligence that a building was about to be taken down and mistakenly broadcast as if it already happened, with the target building standing intact visible in the background. Neither the talking head or the on scene reporter corrected the narrative in real time. 

Or

The building in the broadcast wasn't wtc7. Or this was digitally manipulated after the fact. 

Prove it's authentic and it's case closed. I really don't see an alternative. 

Z09 » 27 Sep 2023, 5:56 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 5:56 pm

You have no clue what you're talking about

the video *******

at least I don’t think that it was hit by a missile from Area 51 

Z09 » 27 Sep 2023, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 6:20 pm

You're a liar 
At no time did I ever say any building that day was hit by a missile.

You're a **** liar.
And you know it

Yes you did
 

Mrkelly » 27 Sep 2023, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 6:11 pm

the video *******

at least I don’t think that it was hit by a missile from Area 51

 
 

Neo » 27 Sep 2023, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2023, 4:14 pm

Your faith in government is remarkable. A controlled demolition with an accompanying airshow? Better bow down and suck that Jewish cock because, if they pulled that off, they are indeed protected by Satan. They are the masters of this world. Chatting about this in public, even on a supposedly anonymous chat forum, is taking your life into your hands.

NEO..I think the planes were capable of destroying everything from where they hit the building and everything else on up. Heat travels upward..so some of the jet fuel that soaked a few floors below would have caught fire to the paper and fiurnishings in the floors below but would have been met with a deluge of water from the sprinkler system.
. If you know anything about house fires...everything from about  3 feet abovre the floor on down is the very last to be destroyed and very often things at floor level just get singed.
To remotely detonate the building in a few key locations while all of this other stuff is going on utilizes the technology that is no more sophisticated than the 100s of times that copper penetrator IEDs were detonated via cell phone link against our boys in Iraq and Afghanistan.