To me, he was more than half bad. He forced me to get finger printed and photographed under threat of 20 years in prison and a 250K fine. Yeah, I take that kind of **** personally. I hate the guy.
tRump wants to take your guns away if your neighbor call the cops and says that you are a danger to societySkans » 02 Oct 2023, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑ To me, he was more than half bad. He forced me to get finger printed and photographed under threat of 20 years in prison and a 250K fine. Yeah, I take that kind of **** personally. I hate the guy.
I can deal with that. Because, ALL of my neighbors are armed to the teeth. And, they shoot on their land every chance they get. They carry, even when they come over to my house. No one is taking anyone's guns away in my neighborhood. But, Clinton threatened to fine me 250K and throw me in prison for 20 years. F- Clinton.Mrkelly » 02 Oct 2023, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑ tRump wants to take your guns away if your neighbor call the cops and says that you are a danger to society
and THEN find out if it’s true
so, there is that
But tRump wants to take away “due process” and take your gunsSkans » 02 Oct 2023, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ I can deal with that. Because, ALL of my neighbors are armed to the teeth. And, they shoot on their land every chance they get. They carry, even when they come over to my house. No one is taking anyone's guns away in my neighborhood. But, Clinton threatened to fine me 250K and throw me in prison for 20 years. F- Clinton.
Your neighbors dont have any teethSkans » 02 Oct 2023, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ I can deal with that. Because, ALL of my neighbors are armed to the teeth. And, they shoot on their land every chance they get. They carry, even when they come over to my house. No one is taking anyone's guns away in my neighborhood. But, Clinton threatened to fine me 250K and throw me in prison for 20 years. F- Clinton.

I don't like that position, but it is better than what any Democrat will do.Mrkelly » 02 Oct 2023, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ But tRump wants to take away “due process” and take your guns
and you can “deal with that”
OK Mr second amendment
show me on Dem that ever said that he wanted to do away with due processSkans » 02 Oct 2023, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑ I don't like that position, but it is better than what any Democrat will do.
Biden wants to ban AR's and "Assault Weapons". Kennedy wants to ban "Assault Weapons". Beto wants to ban all semi-auto pistols and rifles. F-you, you better have something better than THAT if you want to debate me on this issue. Democrats suck tranny cock.Mrkelly » 02 Oct 2023, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ show me on Dem that ever said that he wanted to do away with due process
Beto want to take ARs, but he want to pass a law
tRump wants to skip the law
show where any of them have said the want to take away due process so they can take your gunsSkans » 02 Oct 2023, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑ Biden wants to ban AR's and "Assault Weapons". Kennedy wants to ban "Assault Weapons". Beto wants to ban all semi-auto pistols and rifles. F-you, you better have something better than THAT if you want to debate me on this issue. Democrats suck tranny cock.
I didn't say anything about due process. I said ALL OF THEM WANT TO TAKE AWAY OUR GUNS. But, since you are pressing the point, Democrats hate Due Process. They have proven this time and time again.Mrkelly » 02 Oct 2023, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ show where any of them have said the want to take away due process so they can take your guns
but tRump suggested it in a cabinet meetingSkans » 02 Oct 2023, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ I didn't say anything about due process. I said ALL OF THEM WANT TO TAKE AWAY OUR GUNS. But, since you are pressing the point, Democrats hate Due Process. They have proven this time and time again.
So what? He suggested it. And, he was advised not to do it. So, he did not pursue it. Lots of **** is "suggested" in cabinet meetings. That's what they are for - batting around ideas. So, yeah, I have no problem with that. It went nowhere.Mrkelly » 02 Oct 2023, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ but tRump suggested it in a cabinet meeting
but you can “deal with that”
Let's not forget how inflationary Women's Lib was to our economy.Cannonpointer » 01 Oct 2023, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑ He was one hell of an orator - he really was. What he lacked in fluidity he more than made up in easy homilies, affability, and sheer believability.
He was an extremely weak president. Even the homosexual party INSISTS that Tip O'Neal bent him over and dicked him repeatedly. Almost every gay on this board has defended his record by assuring me Tip **** him in the *** on the regular.
He tripled the national debt, fudged every number the feds had thitherto kept honest, and intorduced the term "service economy." He stole the future of the following generations. The middle class had grown under every previous president since FDR. Under reagan, it began a swift and steady decline.
There were more rich people, but also more poor. Which is pretty much how third world countries are.

lmao. You must live in a cave. The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act passed last year. About 20 states have taken advantage of it.Mrkelly » 02 Oct 2023, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ show where any of them have said the want to take away due process so they can take your guns
so, what’s you problem with the Dems?Skans » 02 Oct 2023, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑ So what? He suggested it. And, he was advised not to do it. So, he did not pursue it. Lots of **** is "suggested" in cabinet meetings. That's what they are for - batting around ideas. So, yeah, I have no problem with that. It went nowhere.
Mrkelly » 02 Oct 2023, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ but tRump suggested it in a cabinet meeting
but you can “deal with that”
Mrkelly » 02 Oct 2023, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ so, what’s you problem with the Dems?
their rhetoric about taking away ARs went nowhere too
they only “suggested it”
Clinton passed an assault weapon ban.Mrkelly » 02 Oct 2023, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ so, what’s you problem with the Dems?
their rhetoric about taking away ARs went nowhere too
they only “suggested it”
They must have agreed with tRumpLincolnNebraska » 02 Oct 2023, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ lmao. You must live in a cave. The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act passed last year. About 20 states have taken advantage of it.
https://www.murphy.senate.gov/imo/media ... t_text.pdf