Liberal Forum

Buck Naked » 18 Oct 2023, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 4:14 pm

a person who advocates an aggressive or warlike policy, especially in foreign affairs.
"severe limits were put on the peace plan by party hawks"

what is MSLSD?

Like you don't know the slang for a news running 24/7 network on cable.

Skans » 18 Oct 2023, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 4:41 pm

Hezbollah v. Israel
Hamas v. Israel

Israel has ADMITTED to creating Hamas to **** with the PLO. The fact Iran gives Hamas pocket change notwithstanding, Sunni Hamas is NOT an Iranian proxy. 

Skans » 18 Oct 2023, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 4:41 pm

10 years of civil war in Syria

That is the US, child. Syria and Iran have magnificent relations.

Skans » 18 Oct 2023, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 4:41 pm

Lebanese Hezbollah vs. Lebanese Christians.

Civil strife and proxy wars are not the same. Lebanon is stable and at peace. You don't get to just make up wars, fruit.

Skans » 18 Oct 2023, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 4:41 pm

Katib Hezbollah, Aasiab, Narakat Hezbollah in Iraq

So, WE set a country on fire, and a hezie v hezie situation is IRAN'S fault?  

**** off, retard!

Skans » 18 Oct 2023, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 4:41 pm

Yemen v. Iranian backed Yemenites (Ansar Allah)

Look, a real one! 

Problem is, WE and the SAUDS are the OTHER side of that proxy war. So that's one apiece.

Skans » 18 Oct 2023, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 4:41 pm

Baharain - Iranian Al Ashtar Brigades, and Iranian backed Saraya al Mukahr

Sunni regime, shia majority - that problem is POLITICAL, and you can't blame Iran for that. No doubt Iran BACKS the shia and has CHANNELS to the shia - it's the shia thing to do and it's mighty shia of them. But a proxy war it isn't, fruit.

You named one actual proxy war: yemen. You named some minor POLITICAL unrest - Bahrain; but it's not even serious enough to get the island listed as unsafe for TOURISM, pathetic girl.

I owe ya two proxy wars and two terrorist organizations. Syria is one proxy war.

US Code Section 127e funds the Defense Secretary to spend up to $100 million in highly classified black money each fiscal year to support “foreign forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals” - to "combat terrorism."  Here are two of the 20+ proxy wars we have funded between 2017 and today under that particular budget line item:

Egypt (Enigma Hunter)
Tunisia (Obsidian Tower)

Me: Yemen, Syria, Egypt, Tunisia;
You: Yemen. You mouth shat about Lebanon and Bahrain - neither of which is at war, both of which are stable and were designated SAFE FOR TOURISTS until the recent kerfuffle which put the REGION on a no-go.

I owe ya two terrorist groups. I'll give ya al qaeda/isil/isis (one group under different brands, created by and working for us), and I'll give ya the kurdish terror group(s) we activated against al Assad. I can throw in egypt and tunisia - we used local terror groups there. Our terrorist proxies murdered Khadafi - so there's another.

We have used terrorists all over central and south america for the past century. Reagan funded the priest-murdering contras. Obama armed CIA's mexican cartels to prevent that government from shutting them down.  

We have a very long history of supporting terrorism and fighting proxy wars, fruity - FAR more extensive than Iran's. In fact, Iran is the VICTIM of one of our proxy wars, which was the iran/iraq war. 

You may be seated, bitch.

 
 

Cannonpointer » 18 Oct 2023, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 6:04 pm

Israel has ADMITTED to creating Hamas to **** with the PLO. The fact Iran gives Hamas pocket change notwithstanding, Sunni Hamas is NOT an Iranian proxy. 

That is the US, child. Syria and Iran have magnificent relations.

Civil strife and proxy wars are not the same. Lebanon is stable and at peace. You don't get to just make up wars, fruit.

So, WE set a country on fire, and a hezie v hezie situation is IRAN'S fault?  

**** off, retard!

Look, a real one! 

Problem is, WE and the SAUDS are the OTHER side of that proxy war. So that's one apiece.

Sunni regime, shia majority - that problem is POLITICAL, and you can't blame Iran for that. No doubt Iran BACKS the shia and has CHANNELS to the shia - it's the shia thing to do and it's mighty shia of them. But a proxy war it isn't, fruit.

You named one actual proxy war: yemen. You named some minor POLITICAL unrest - Bahrain; but it's not even serious enough to get the island listed as unsafe for TOURISM, pathetic girl.

I owe ya two proxy wars and two terrorist organizations. Syria is one proxy war.

US Code Section 127e funds the Defense Secretary to spend up to $100 million in highly classified black money each fiscal year to support “foreign forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals” - to "combat terrorism."  Here are two of the 20+ proxy wars we have funded between 2017 and today under that particular budget line item:

Egypt (Enigma Hunter)
Tunisia (Obsidian Tower)

Me: Yemen, Syria, Egypt, Tunisia;
You: Yemen. You mouth shat about Lebanon and Bahrain - neither of which is at war, both of which are stable and were designated SAFE FOR TOURISTS until the recent kerfuffle which put the REGION on a no-go.

I owe ya two terrorist groups. I'll give ya al qaeda/isil/isis (one group under different brands, created by and working for us), and I'll give ya the kurdish terror group(s) we activated against al Assad. I can throw in egypt and tunisia - we used local terror groups there. Our terrorist proxies murdered Khadafi - so there's another.

We have used terrorists all over central and south america for the past century. Reagan funded the priest-murdering contras. Obama armed CIA's mexican cartels to prevent that government from shutting them down.  

We have a very long history of supporting terrorism and fighting proxy wars, fruity - FAR more extensive than Iran's. In fact, Iran is the VICTIM of one of our proxy wars, which was the iran/iraq war. 

You may be seated, bitch.

Admit it CP... you've been working on that reply for over an hour now haven't you.

 
 

Skans » 18 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm

P U S S Y . :die:  
 

Aren't you the culturalist nurturing next generation martyrs for reality's sake using other people's last generation replacements as sacrificial goats saving humanities..

RedheadedStranger » 18 Oct 2023, 6:07 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 6:07 pm

Admit it CP... you've been working on that reply for over an hour now haven't you.

I am not sure it was an hour - but it could very well have been.

I'm a striver, son. I strive to give the board good content - while **** cry that standing for my positions is a threat to the board's existence, since they lack the intellect and the stamina to defend their weak, secondhand world views. 

I can tell you I spent a good ten minutes just on editing, as I had to unslap the *** ten times for want of space in the post. I was ready to post at over 5100 characters and I was allowed only 4000 - so that's a 20% cut in content to come in under the wire. 

And yes, I had to do some googling. I'm not walking around with Bahrain's safe travel status on the top of my head.
 

Cannonpointer » 18 Oct 2023, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 6:11 pm

I am not sure it was an hour - but it could very well have been.

I'm a striver, son. I strive to give the board good content - while **** cry that standing for my positions is a threat to the board's existence, since they lack the intellect and the stamina to defend their weak, secondhand world views. 

I can tell you I spent a good ten minutes just on editing, as I had to unslap the *** ten times for want of space in the post. I was ready to post at over 5100 characters and I was allowed only 4000 - so that's a 20% cut in content to come in under the wire. 

And yes, I had to do some googling. I'm not walking around with Bahrain's safe travel status on the top of my head.

You said "good content"...

 
 

Redheaded Stranger » 18 Oct 2023, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 6:22 pm

You said "good content"...

:rofl:  
 

His opinion of good content.

RedheadedStranger » 18 Oct 2023, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 6:22 pm

You said "good content"...

Yes, son. I did.

My content has been stolen by production companies and by posters all over the interwebs. Many of my takedowns of the bush republicans were lifted directly from these pages by Jon Stewarts writers, back when the Daily Show was still funny and clever and biting social commentary.

I only go to one board - mine. But you will find cannonpointer soks all over the interwebs. ANd you will find my arguments copy-pasted around the webisphere, as well. 

If I google RedheadedStranger, I only find you.

Don't feel bad. A lot of people have to die for me to be me 
 

Cannonpointer » 18 Oct 2023, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 6:29 pm

Yes, son. I did.

My content has been stolen by production companies and by posters all over the interwebs. Many of my takedowns of the bush republicans were lifted directly from these pages by Jon Stewarts writers, back when the Daily Show was still funny and clever and biting social commentary.

I only go to one board - mine. But you will find cannonpointer soks all over the interwebs. ANd you will find my arguments copy-pasted around the webisphere, as well. 

If I google RedheadedStranger, I only find you.

Don't feel bad. A lot of people have to die for me to be me 
 

Always allowing others to sacrifice their time so you get to enjoy your own at their expense. Isn't that the same mentality of using other people's money?

Nostradamus'omh » 18 Oct 2023, 5:01 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 5:01 pm

Like you don't know the slang for a news running 24/7 network on cable.

I was axed by Cindy what it means I answered her 
 

Nostradamus'omh » 18 Oct 2023, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 6:34 pm

Always allowing others to sacrifice their time so you get to enjoy your own at their expense. Isn't that the same mentality of using other people's money?

I used some of your mom's money to buy a razor. 

But then I used the razor to shave her back, so, I mean, did I short change her? 

And if I did, was it anywhere NEAR the crime your dad committed when he got her preggers with you?
 

Cannonpointer » 18 Oct 2023, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 6:29 pm

Yes, son. I did.

My content has been stolen by production companies and by posters all over the interwebs. Many of my takedowns of the bush republicans were lifted directly from these pages by Jon Stewarts writers, back when the Daily Show was still funny and clever and biting social commentary.

I only go to one board - mine. But you will find cannonpointer soks all over the interwebs. ANd you will find my arguments copy-pasted around the webisphere, as well. 

If I google RedheadedStranger, I only find you.

Don't feel bad. A lot of people have to die for me to be me

Rush Limbaugh used to steal my content back in the day.

No joke.
 

RedheadedStranger » 18 Oct 2023, 6:38 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 6:38 pm

Rush Limbaugh used to steal my content back in the day.

No joke.

I would not doubt it for an instant. The man was voracious in every respect. He was brilliant, and he created a demand that took TEAMS of people to fill - just as did jon stewart. That his writers, seeing something clever you said, would present it as their own? The only thing I would find hard to believe is that they WOULDN'T do that.

I mean, why NOT take diamonds you find laying on the ground? When I saw my bits used thrice in short order on Stewart's show, I was not angry. I did not blame his writer. Hell, the first time, I figured parallel thinking. The second time, I said huh. The third time, I knew - but I did not object. I wasn't putting the narratives to any use beyond this board - how was I injured?
 

Cannonpointer » 18 Oct 2023, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 6:37 pm

I used some of your mom's money to buy a razor. 

But then I used the razor to shave her back, so, I mean, did I short change her? 

And if I did, was it anywhere NEAR the crime your dad committed when he got her preggers with you?
 

Must have been over 17 years ago and to do that you had to fight my sibling over each penny.

Cannonpointer » 18 Oct 2023, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 6:44 pm

I would not doubt it for an instant. The man was voracious in every respect. He was brilliant, and he created a demand that took TEAMS of people to fill - just as did jon stewart. That his writers, seeing something clever you said, would present it as their own? The only thing I would find hard to believe is that they WOULDN'T do that.

I mean, why NOT take diamonds you find laying on the ground? When I saw my bits used thrice in short order on Stewart's show, I was not angry. I did not blame his writer. Hell, the first time, I figured parallel thinking. The second time, I said huh. The third time, I knew - but I did not object. I wasn't putting the narratives to any use beyond this board - how was I injured?

Back several decades ago the BellSouth message boards were like the Wild West of internet discussion forums. That **** was fun.

What's so funny is BellSouth hosted the boards as an afterthought on their homepage, and never bothered to even look in on them, let alone moderate them. It was truly NHB in its infancy.

BellSouth became ATT and the boards were eventually shut down, but there was a year or two there that it was wide assed open. Kinda like this place is now. I guess that's why I like boards like this so much. They are where I cut my internet teeth back on the late 90's and early 2000's.
 

RedheadedStranger » 18 Oct 2023, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 6:51 pm

Back several decades ago the BellSouth message boards were like the Wild West of internet discussion forums. That **** was fun.

What's so funny is BellSouth hosted the boards as an afterthought on their homepage, and never bothered to even look in on them, let alone moderate them. It was truly NHB in its infancy.

BellSouth became ATT and the boards were eventually shut down, but there was a year or two there that it was wide assed open. Kinda like this place is now. I guess that's why I like boards like this so much. They are where I cut my internet teeth back on the late 90's and early 2000's.

Wish I'd known. 
 

Redheaded Stranger » 18 Oct 2023, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 6:51 pm

Back several decades ago the BellSouth message boards were like the Wild West of internet discussion forums. That **** was fun.

What's so funny is BellSouth hosted the boards as an afterthought on their homepage, and never bothered to even look in on them, let alone moderate them. It was truly NHB in its infancy.

BellSouth became ATT and the boards were eventually shut down, but there was a year or two there that it was wide assed open. Kinda like this place is now. I guess that's why I like boards like this so much. They are where I cut my internet teeth back on the late 90's and early 2000's.
 

Bell South was AT&T before 1983 and the fed judge ruled it a monopoly so the Department of Energy could get their hands on all the patents held by bell labs that created the blueprints for things like netflix and such streaming sites on the web. !8 years later they became part of At&t again through wireless communication networking.
I worked 32 years for a baby bell company. that is how I understand networking inside out when it comes to lines of global communications bypassing 24/7 logistical truths.

Cannonpointer » 18 Oct 2023, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 7:00 pm

Wish I'd known.

That's where I met benson13... and a few others that post here still... although the names are all different now.

I found Benson over at .org by doing an internet search for one of his favorite catch phrases...

"RepubliKKKans"

 


 

RedheadedStranger » 18 Oct 2023, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 7:08 pm

That's where I met benson13... and a few others that post here still... although the names are all different now.

I found Benson over at .org by doing an internet search for one of his favorite catch phrases...

"RepubliKKKans"

If I recall, he was completely worthless, yeah?

That is to say, he lied without shame, was refuted without retraction or acknowledgment, and did not have any regard for the truth. Is that a fair representation?
 

Cannonpointer » 18 Oct 2023, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2023, 7:09 pm

If I recall, he was completely worthless, yeah?

That is to say, he lied without shame, was refuted without retraction or acknowledgment, and did not have any regard for the truth. Is that a fair representation?

Pretty much, but he had his moments.

He was an aggravating little **** mostly, but overall not a bad guy. We had always planned to meet for a beer someday but it never happened. Probably for the best because I would have most likely knocked the piss out of his *** before it was over.
​​​​​​