Now isn't eternity. Everyone of a social identity is doing it one way or another that sustains alternate realities believing in parallel universes each generation gap changing population one lifetime at a time now.
You can disagree with the definition of disenfranchise to your whiny *** liberal hearts content...it doesn't change the definition.maineman » 25 Oct 2023, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑ We'll have to agree to disagree. Courts, however, agree with me, and will NOT disenfranchise any registered voter who cast his or her vote in 2020 in good faith according to the rules published by their state and local governments. Don't like it? Move.
he never calls me “sweetie”righteous » 25 Oct 2023, 6:53 pm » wrote: ↑ REPEATING WHAT YOUR MAIN SQUEEZE, *** REFERS TO YOU AS.
YOU AND *** MUST BE QUITE THE FLAMBOYANT AMANTS MASCULINS
Remember that sentiment the next time you (or another liberal) whine about the SCOTUS rulings overturning Roe, slapping down gun restrictions, allowing bakeries and web designers to tell *** to pound sand,etc. The courts agree with me (us)...Don't like it? Move.
Since when do definitions count when interpretation adds confusion to any word all the time. Live vs live vs evil. Live in person, live as a person, evil is just ignoring live displacement eternally separated by one's chromosome combination present.ConsRule » 26 Oct 2023, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑ You can disagree with the definition of disenfranchise to your whiny *** liberal hearts content...it doesn't change the definition.
ConsRule » 26 Oct 2023, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑ Remember that sentiment the next time you (or another liberal) whine about the SCOTUS rulings overturning Roe, slapping down gun restrictions, allowing bakeries and web designers to tell *** to pound sand,etc. The courts agree with me (us)...Don't like it? Move.
What are the long term effects affecting each generation gap honoring traditional beliefs now isn't eternity when chromosome results are never same form as the arriving fertilized cell changes population occupying space one at a time eternally separated here, now?maineman » 26 Oct 2023, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑ Actually. I am fine with all that. I use things like Hobbs and Masterpiece Cakeshop as civics lessons to show people the long-term effects of voting for Republicans. ALL elections have consequences and SCOTUS is proof of that adage. If we had worked harder in 2016, the clown would not have been elected and SCOTUS would have a liberal majority for the next thirty years. We have no one to blame but ourselves...just like YOUR side has no one to blame for your inability to adjust your GOTV efforts to maximize mail-in balloting during COVID. You snoozed, you lost. We snoozed in 2016 and we lost, but you didn't see Democrats storming the capitol attempting to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power because of it. THAT is the biggest difference between us.
BEHIND CLOSED DOORS HE DOES, BUTTERCUP.
LINK FROM WHAT, NUMBNUTS?
righteous » 26 Oct 2023, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ LINK FROM WHAT, NUMBNUTS?
INSTEAD OF YOUR LEFTIST CIRCLE JERK GAMES TELL US IF YOU APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE OF BIDENS OPEN DOOR POLICY.
I KNOW ITS DIFFICULT FOR YOU TO REFRAIN BUT NO LEFTIST GIBBERISH AS AN ANSWER.
APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE.
You dance between literal interpretations and figurative estimations never coming to specific relative results present as self evidently here evolving at the same time.maineman » 26 Oct 2023, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ Show a link to a post from me where I said I didn't oppose open borders. You claim they were "my words". Show us all MY WORDS saying that, or run away from it. We KNOW you'd never have the character to admit you were wrong.
I saw democrats capitalizing on a Chinese biological weapon. Taking steps to destroy the record economy that Obama and Trump provided. When that wasn't enough to ensure a Biden presidency democrats threw gasoline on simmering racial tensions. Democrats had been keeping racism alive on life support for decades and played this card to improve Biden's odds. When that still wasn't enough they performed ballot harvesting operations against local law but easier to hide with increased mail in voting opportunities.maineman » 26 Oct 2023, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑ Actually. I am fine with all that. I use things like Hobbs and Masterpiece Cakeshop as civics lessons to show people the long-term effects of voting for Republicans. ALL elections have consequences and SCOTUS is proof of that adage. If we had worked harder in 2016, the clown would not have been elected and SCOTUS would have a liberal majority for the next thirty years. We have no one to blame but ourselves...just like YOUR side has no one to blame for your inability to adjust your GOTV efforts to maximize mail-in balloting during COVID. You snoozed, you lost. We snoozed in 2016 and we lost, but you didn't see Democrats storming the capitol attempting to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power because of it. THAT is the biggest difference between us.
Neo » 26 Oct 2023, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ I saw democrats capitalizing on a Chinese biological weapon. Taking steps to destroy the record economy that Obama and Trump provided. When that wasn't enough to ensure a Biden presidency democrats threw gasoline on simmering racial tensions. Democrats had been keeping racism alive on life support for decades and played this card to improve Biden's odds. When that still wasn't enough they performed ballot harvesting operations against local law but easier to hide with increased mail in voting opportunities.
It's also very perceptible to fraud ......maineman » 26 Oct 2023, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ cool spin. Did Hannity give that to you? Ballot harvesting is legal.
SO YOU WANT TO ****** OUT LIKE A TYPICAL LEFTIST THAT IS AFRAID TO ADMIT HE SUPPORTS OPEN BORDERS FOR FEAR OF GETTING YOUR *** REAMED OUT AND SOREmaineman » 26 Oct 2023, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ Show a link to a post from me where I said I didn't oppose open borders. You claim they were "my words". Show us all MY WORDS saying that, or run away from it. We KNOW you'd never have the character to admit you were wrong.
YOUR VIRGIN ASSHOLE WAS STOLEN TOO, HYMIE, BY THAT BIG SOMALIAN PAL OF YOURS
righteous » 26 Oct 2023, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ SO YOU WANT TO ****** OUT LIKE A TYPICAL LEFTIST THAT IS AFRAID TO ADMIT HE SUPPORTS OPEN BORDERS FOR FEAR OF GETTING YOUR *** REAMED OUT AND SORE
OK ITS WHAT I EXPECTED, MARY
righteous » 26 Oct 2023, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ YOUR VIRGIN ASSHOLE WAS STOLEN TOO, HYMIE, BY THAT BIG SOMALIAN PAL OF YOURS![]()
I REMEMBER EXACTLY WHAT YOUR STANCE ON OPEN BORDERS IS, HYMIEmaineman » 26 Oct 2023, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh.... so you lied when you claimed those were "my words"? Gosh. Whoever would have expected that from you? [/sarcasm off]
The fact of the matter is, not only have I never SAID that I support open borders, I do not even THINK that open borders are a good idea.
You are a liar and you have all but admitted it here.
But I'll give you one more chance: link to a post where I said I supported open borders or show the tiny modicum of character necessary to admit you misspoke.