Yup. He says, "never made it to a court room." What he SHOULD have said was, "never managed to get considered by a court."JustinSane » 27 Oct 2023, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ It bothers me a great deal. It bothers me that over 8000 sworn affidavits were never heard, but rather, casually dismissed - despite the fact they are legal evidence. It bothers me that admitted bias establishment interference with social media did not end up in the sharp end of a courtroom, despite the fact they bragged about it in Time magazine. It bothers me that the vast majority of legal cases were dismissed on technicalities before anything had been heard. It bothers me that there's a relentless legal pincer movement to destroy one man - the very person launched legal proceedings against the establishment accepted outcome of the election.
If there's one thing that defines my state of mind - it's 'bothered'
I dunno.. you tell me what you think?maineman » 27 Oct 2023, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ why do you think Rudy didn't bother to take those binders to a courthouse in PA?
Cannonpointer » 27 Oct 2023, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑ You mean was never CONSIDERED by a court.
They refuse to look. They prefer their families live.
Why would THAT happen? Were any of the malefactors who lied to fisa courts to overthrow the government held to a lawful standard?maineman » 27 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I think that the reason Team Kraken never produced their volumes of supposed "evidence" was that none of them were in a hurry to lose their law licenses.
Again, CODE OF ETHICS? The justice system turned a blind eye to insurrection for four **** years.maineman » 27 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑And attempting to pawn off "affidavits" that merely recounted people's impressions of what they thought might have been suspicious behavior on the part of poll workers as "evidence of massive voter fraud" would be a violation of their code of ethics.
I beg to differ. Here is the smoking gun, right here:
Cannonpointer » 27 Oct 2023, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Why would THAT happen? Were any of the malefactors who lied to fisa courts to overthrow the government held to a lawful standard?
Are you admitting there are two justice systems?
Again, CODE OF ETHICS? The justice system turned a blind eye to insurrection for four **** years.
Are you finally admitting that there are two justice systems?
I beg to differ. Here is the smoking gun, right here:
https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/ ... -tease.jpg
There was a four year investigation of the sitting president's legitimacy based on oppo research and outright lies to a fisa court. An enormous percentage of the coting public was influenced by this insurrection.maineman » 27 Oct 2023, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ there was no evidence of massive voter fraud. Biden won fair and square.
.
maineman » 21 Oct 2023, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Seriously. Two of the biggest proponents of the Big Lie, Powell and Chesebro, have both pleaded guilty. If you were an attorney, why would you EVER plead guilty to a crime you KNOW you didn't commit?
Aren't you MAGA Morons finally beginning to realize that the clown and Team Kraken were conning you all along?
Will you EVER admit it?
.
Why does reality create several types of truth when evolving only occurs at one time living is an equal time just adapting to life as ancestrally positioned since specifically conceived to specifically dead in the optics of random chance developed ignoring nothing stays the same total sum evolved now.
That's a 10-4 big buddy!Cannonpointer » 22 Oct 2023, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ Do you think Putin will steal the election for him again?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom You are correct as then the election staff wouldn't be able to reject votes for not meeting the ballot criteria...rules that have been in place for as long as voting has been around...ConsRule » 25 Oct 2023, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑ No...it does not. The definition of disenfranchise is "deprive (someone) of the right to vote." (emphasis mine). Those people had the right to vote...evidenced by them voting. Disqualifying a vote IS NOT disenfranchisement. You may not like the definition...but tough ****. Disallowing the unconstitutional votes as they relate to the President, would not disenfranchise anyone.
Why are liberals so **** stupid?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom that's a lie on its face...armed with decades of data, you yourself admitted that thru Covid propaganda fearing voters would have the advantage as republicans were prone to vote in person...throwing out all of the laws/rules that left the doors wide open to do whatever they wanted...maineman » 25 Oct 2023, 8:44 pm » wrote: ↑ there was no cheating. Nothing in the revised pandemic-driven procedural changes explicitly favored one party over the other.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom MackTheFinger » 25 Oct 2023, 9:29 pm » wrote: ↑ mainvain is allowed to call MAGA Hats morons but I can't call him mainvain which means a penis where I come from.
.
.
I'll take OTAY for a Hundred...Bill.
.
.

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom why do that when we were subjected to 4.25 years of Russian collusion lies perpetuated by MSM and social media (arms of the DNC)?maineman » 26 Oct 2023, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑ Actually. I am fine with all that. I use things like Hobbs and Masterpiece Cakeshop as civics lessons to show people the long-term effects of voting for Republicans. ALL elections have consequences and SCOTUS is proof of that adage. If we had worked harder in 2016, the clown would not have been elected and SCOTUS would have a liberal majority for the next thirty years. We have no one to blame but ourselves...just like YOUR side has no one to blame for your inability to adjust your GOTV efforts to maximize mail-in balloting during COVID. You snoozed, you lost. We snoozed in 2016 and we lost, but you didn't see Democrats storming the capitol attempting to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power because of it. THAT is the biggest difference between us.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom how about one from your side? do you decry open borders? If not, then you must support them...maineman » 26 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Liar. I have never supported open borders. You claimed that I did and that you had my words to prove my position. You lied about that as well.
You are truth are like oil and water.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 8.maineman » 26 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑ I support Biden because I am a Democrat, and I HATE the GOP platform, especially its stance on abortion, social safety net, the environment, tax policy, Russia, et.al. I despise the clown and I would vote for literally ANYONE that the democrats nominated before I would EVER cast a vote for that fat, misogynistic, incurious, racist ****....
1. Biden did not give us inflation. The world economy did
2. See #1 above
3. I am glad that he stood by Ukraine and strengthened NATO to help the Ukrainians fend off Russian aggression. I am glad he stood by Israel in the face of the terrorism unleashed by Hamas.
4. My taxes are not appreciably higher
5. I LOVE the idea of new IRS agents targeted at wealthy tax dodgers
6. Riding a bike is not on the POTUS job description. But do you really think that the clown could?
7. Fake news
8. man woman person camera television
9. It isn't a hoax
10. When you go after Pence, let me know
11. Hunter is a train wreck. Oddly enough, I never voted for Hunter. Did you vote for Ivanka, or Eric or Donny Jr.?
12. Fake news
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom