NOT TRUE. MANY LEGAL EXPERTS CHIMED IN ON WHAT THEY KNEW TO BE THE DURATION OF THE CASE AND EXPENSES INCURREDmaineman » 24 Oct 2023, 9:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Court trials don't run up huge expenses. It would have only lasted a few days.
YEP. This sad fact is why Rothschild formed the ADL way back in the very early 1900s as one of the very first things on the list to take control of the USA.righteous » 24 Oct 2023, 9:17 pm » wrote: ↑ DO YOU KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT LAW LIKE YOU PROCLAIM, MOPBOY?
TO PLEAD NOT GUILTY WOULD DRAW OUT THE CASE FOR MANY MONTHS IF NOT YEARS AND WOULD COST MILLIONS FOR THE DEFENDANT LEAVING THEM PENNILESS.
THIS WAS THE INTENDED PLAN OF THE CORRUPT JUDICIAL SYSTEM
righteous » 24 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm » wrote: ↑ YOU HAVE NO **** IDEA WHAT IT COSTS TO DEFEND YOURSELF IN CASES OF THIS NATURE
GO BACK TO MOPPING FLOORS
YAWN
DONE WITH YOUR IGNORANCE
lol. Most ignorant claim ever.maineman » 24 Oct 2023, 9:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Court trials don't run up huge expenses. It would have only lasted a few days.
DEFENSE LAWYERS ARE FREE?maineman » 24 Oct 2023, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑ She had a court date. HER request. And to defend YOURSELF costs absolutely nothing - although you probably would have a fool for a client if you did. She knew the evidence was overwhelming. She knew she could cut a deal. She did.
righteous » 24 Oct 2023, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑ NOT TRUE. MANY LEGAL EXPERTS CHIMED IN ON WHAT THEY KNEW TO BE THE DURATION OF THE CASE AND EXPENSES INCURRED
righteous » 24 Oct 2023, 9:38 pm » wrote: ↑ DEFENSE LAWYERS ARE FREE?ELLIS COULDN'T AFFORD THE LENGTHY CASE AND TOOK A PLEA
YAWN
BYE BYE
As a grammar geek, I got rid of the dependent clause - leaving only the unvarnished fact of the matter.maineman » 24 Oct 2023, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Seeing as I am not really conversant in your creative litany of homebrewed epithets, I really can't answer that question.
YAWNmaineman » 24 Oct 2023, 9:38 pm » wrote: ↑ did you read about them on Gateway Pundit, or did Hannity tell you?![]()
The case against all 19 co-defendants might have taken a long time, but she asked to be tried separately, and early. Trying Powell alone would have been cut and dried... and she knew it. She may not have known for sure, but after the first conference with Fani who undoubtedly gave her a peak at the evidence arrayed against her and also gave her a look at what leniency in exchange for cooperation might look like, she folded like a circus tent.
Cannonpointer » 24 Oct 2023, 9:43 pm » wrote: ↑ As a grammar geek, I got rid of the dependent clause - leaving only the unvarnished fact of the matter.
ELLIS WAS CROWDFUNDING LEGAL FEES SINCE AUGUST, THEN RAN OUT OF MONEY, BONEHEADmaineman » 24 Oct 2023, 9:40 pm » wrote: ↑ You said that she would defend herself. Do you know what that term means?
YOU NEED TO RE-EVALUATE YOUR USELESS EXISTENCE, MOPBOY.maineman » 24 Oct 2023, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑ you need to have your glass of warm milk and call it a day, little cowboy.
ONE LOOK IN THE MIRROR TO REMIND YOURSELF YOU'RE AS DUMB AS YOU LOOK.
righteous » 24 Oct 2023, 9:56 pm » wrote: ↑ ELLIS WAS CROWDFUNDING LEGAL FEES SINCE AUGUST, THEN RAN OUT OF MONEY, BONEHEAD
righteous » 24 Oct 2023, 9:58 pm » wrote: ↑ YOU NEED TO RE-EVALUATE YOUR USELESS EXISTENCE, MOPBOY.
BEST YOU GET BACK TO CLEANING FLOORS IN THE CHILDRENS [sic] CLASSROOMS
![]()
righteous » 24 Oct 2023, 10:00 pm » wrote: ↑ ONE LOOK IN THE MIRROR TO REMIND YOURSELF YOU'RE AS DUMB AS YOU LOOK.
![]()
![]()
YAWNmaineman » 24 Oct 2023, 10:02 pm » wrote: ↑ warm milk. go for it.
BTW..I haven't mopped anything since I mopped the deck of the USS Dubuque in the summer of 1969.