They aren't waiting for a conviction. Conviction on the charges he's facing wouldn't disqualify him.MackTheFinger » 23 Oct 2023, 10:08 pm » wrote: ↑ .
NO !
.
Well not if he is brought down under the law.
.
It's all just a big circle-jerk for the Rachel Maddow crowd....Neo » 23 Oct 2023, 10:20 pm » wrote: ↑ They aren't waiting for a conviction. Conviction on the charges he's facing wouldn't disqualify him.
That is the precedent they are setting with these suits. I predict some will be successful.MackTheFinger » 23 Oct 2023, 10:31 pm » wrote: ↑ .
I am 99% sure they can't do it because...than all you would have to do is make accusations against some to suit your agenda.
.
States set ballot eligibility for their elections. Not sure the Supremes will step in.MackTheFinger » 23 Oct 2023, 11:08 pm » wrote: ↑ .
That is what the Supreme Court is for !
.
OMB...can appeal all way to there if he is not satisficed with the rulings.
.Neo » 23 Oct 2023, 11:13 pm » wrote: ↑ States set ballot eligibility for their elections. Not sure the Supremes will step in.
Ancestral position vs social situation among lifetimes never accepting why they were ever born. When will you accept your chromosomes keep you eternally separate lifetime occupying space as displaced here now?maineman » 23 Oct 2023, 7:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Look. I really don't give a **** what you SEE. I know what I lived through. Lebanon was awash with gunfire on a daily basis. Various factions of Lebanese militia were continually engaging with UNIFIL forces and UNTSO officers were routinely called upon to mediate disengagement. That was my job. I never said I DELIVERED fire to hostile forces, I said I took hostile fire. I was always unarmed. I got shot at... a lot. Everybody with blue berets got shot at. And I just missed getting shot at on several occasions as well. I had literally JUST delivered the UN duty vehicle five minutes earlier in the US Embassy parking lot to my Belgian buddy when this happened:
https://search.archives.un.org/united-n ... culture=en
and these guys were my replacements at ILMAC/UNLOB:
https://search.archives.un.org/united-n ... or-ireland
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!Vegas » 23 Oct 2023, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Maybe another insurrection? Except this time it would need to be in the millions, not a couple hundred.
None of those votes would count.
She very well may have believed, in her heart of hearts, that he cheated and that she would have prevailed without that cheating. That belief did not prevent her from conceding the election, which she did - in the videotape on the link I posted.Cannonpointer » 23 Oct 2023, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑ If I concede an issue, that means I am no longer suing over it.
Google, "Mueller Investigation."
In the bedroom, you can, and almost certainly do, have things both ways.
But not on this. Not today, Satan. Not today.
first president elected by write in campaign. Hell of a precedence. then watch the electoral college get required again. to override the will of the people that outvoted those not voting.Squatchman » 24 Oct 2023, 6:03 am » wrote: ↑ None of those votes would count.
He's going to be barred from running at all in those states.
But go ahead. The comedy will be epic.
Trump supporters throwing their votes away has a nice ring to it.
Squatchman » 24 Oct 2023, 5:22 am » wrote: ↑ Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
. That's funny!
wanna bet?Squatchman » 24 Oct 2023, 6:03 am » wrote: ↑ None of those votes would count.
He's going to be barred from running at all in those states.
But go ahead. The comedy will be epic.
Trump supporters throwing their votes away has a nice ring to it.
As hilarious as top down vs bottom up, leaderships vs fellowships, inside out trading gets advantages over those only allowed to trade secrets outside in.Sumela » 24 Oct 2023, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ The left/right obsession
with Trumpy is funny.
ukspeshunALjizm!!!
Hey, I didn't call you a *** dicker or anything.maineman » 24 Oct 2023, 6:16 am » wrote: ↑ She very well may have believed, in her heart of hearts, that he cheated and that she would have prevailed without that cheating. That belief did not prevent her from conceding the election, which she did - in the videotape on the link I posted.
I would suggest that we step a bit further away from our spiteful past where personal epithets and slanders seemed to abound. Let's keep our respective conjugal sex lives out of our discussions going forward, eh?
Cannonpointer » 24 Oct 2023, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey, I didn't call you a *** dicker or anything.
What is it that makes everyone on this board tho thenthitive?