Liberal Forum

maineman » 23 Oct 2023, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 4:28 pm

a threat does not need to be armed to be credible.  The term "bloodless coup" exists for a reason.

If the fake electors scheme had been successful, and if Pence had done what the clown wanted him to do instead of what the constitution directed him to do, the outcome could have been completely different.

A threat has to be credible to be a threat. Unarmed idiots **** on walls is monkey blm behavior beneath the conservative cause but it was no insurrection. Having a slate of alternate electors isn't an insurrection. As for a bloodless coup look no further than Russiagate. No further than Hillary Clinton's claim the election was stolen by Russia. That was far from a peaceful transfer of power. 
 
 

Neo » 23 Oct 2023, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 5:50 pm

A threat has to be credible to be a threat. Unarmed idiots **** on walls is monkey blm behavior beneath the conservative cause but it was no insurrection. Having a slate of alternate electors isn't an insurrection. As for a bloodless coup look no further than Russiagate. No further than Hillary Clinton's claim the election was stolen by Russia. That was far from a peaceful transfer of power.

Hillary conceded two days after the election.  Trump never did.  

Having a slate of fake electors, and a plan to disrupt the transfer of power to intimidate the Veep into accepting that slate IS an insurrection.
But hey...you're free to disagree... I could give a ****.  Convincing YOU isn't really essential, is it?  

Neo » 23 Oct 2023, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 10:50 am

Doesn't this prove his contention of rigged elections?

Trump needs no proof. 

Res Ipsa Loquitur. 
 

maineman » 23 Oct 2023, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 4:23 pm

Rashida did not call for an insurrection.  She called for civil disobedience.  BIG difference.

None of the BLM demonstrations were designed to disrupt the constitutional transfer of power.

Nuance is lost on MAGA morons like you.

Still clinging to your totally ridiculous "INSURRECTION NARRATIVE"...?
Can't you see how  Hysterically Gay and Ridiculous that makes you look...?

 
Your MSM  Propaganda sources with their feeble attempts to make the bear spray look so scary to a TOTALLY GAY AND EFFEMINATELY RAISED POS like you.  and they succeeded.
No doubt they traumatized you with the images of the knives, the fire cracker, the flag poles, the "Tug of War" with the bicycle racks and the fire extinguisher too.....  
 
 
 

maineman » 23 Oct 2023, 5:55 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 5:55 pm

Hillary conceded two days after the election.  Trump never did.  

Having a slate of fake electors, and a plan to disrupt the transfer of power to intimidate the Veep into accepting that slate IS an insurrection.
But hey...you're free to disagree... I could give a ****.  Convincing YOU isn't really essential, is it?

Saying Russia manipulated the election and installed Trump is hardly a concession. How is the Russia lie any different from the vote rigging lie? Both are huge turds with tiny corn kernels of truth. 
 

JustinSane » 23 Oct 2023, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 11:53 am

Yes. When I was talking to someone recently about the relentless lawfare unleashed against Trump, as being a means to removing him from the election cycle entirely, they said 'well, why wouldn't they just steal the next election, since you think they did that last time?' to which I replied 'They are.. that's exactly what they're in the process of doing'

All of the stuff that's already acknowledged regarding influence of social media to benefit Biden .. oh sorry.. I meant 'enhance democracy' - is already enough to conclude it was rigged

The left was burning cities to intimidate white voters - and the corrupt FBI got down on one knee to signal to BLM that they were not going to enforce the law.

Remember the left wing lynch mobs coming after the Kenosha Kid? 

The only reason he stood up was that the pigs stood down. EVERY BIT OF THAT VIOLENCE was election interference.
 

Mrkelly » 23 Oct 2023, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 11:58 am

if I had a business I might

good idea goober

I have a business card - a very high quality one - that has the job title "Reasonably Corrupt Opportunist."

Not kidding. Then there is my name and under that, the motto, "Have gun, will travel." Then my phone - and that is the entire card.

Neo » 23 Oct 2023, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 5:58 pm

Saying Russia manipulated the election and installed Trump is hardly a concession. How is the Russia lie any different from the vote rigging lie? Both are huge turds with tiny corn kernels of truth.

She conceded.  She did not contest the results of the election in any court in any state. She did not call up democratic secretaries of state asking them to "find" the extra votes she needed to win their state.  She did not speak before a giant crowd on the ellipse and send them to the Capitol to fight like hell.  And more importantly, she didn't run again after she got beat.

maineman » 23 Oct 2023, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 5:42 pm

I wasn't serving with Naval units at the time.

              I'm just going by what you yourself claimed.... 
   You said you had served 25 years in the US Navy..... JUst trying to make sure I am not misunderstanding you here buddy...

             You said you held the Rank of 0-4 at the time of a Live Fire engagement in 1981..... Were you in another Branch of the Service holding that 0-4 Pay Grade at the time?... Regardless, the only live fire engagement our Military was involved in is the one I sourced for you ---- The First Gulf of Sidra Incident with the 2 Libyan Fighter Jets who were shot down by our 2 F 14 Navy Tomcats... 

              The only other mention of any US Military operation in 1981 is as follows: El Salvador: After a guerrilla offensive against the government of El Salvador, additional U.S. military advisers were sent to El Salvador, bringing the total to approximately 55, to assist in training government forces in counterinsurgency.=12.5px  This was a Personnell / Logistics Operation --- not a Live Fire engagement... 

maineman » 23 Oct 2023, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 12:40 pm

You sat on your lazy *** and didn't even TRY to GOTV.  Now, all you can do is whine and bitch.

I didn't sit on mine. 

I was at the stop the steal rally, pookie. 
 

Cannonpointer » 23 Oct 2023, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 6:03 pm

I didn't sit on mine. 

I was at the stop the steal rally, pookie.

a day late and a dollar short.  

Kobia2 » 23 Oct 2023, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 6:02 pm

              I'm just going by what you yourself claimed.... 
   You said you had served 25 years in the US Navy..... JUst trying to make sure I am not misunderstanding you here buddy...

             You said you held the Rank of 0-4 at the time of a Live Fire engagement in 1981..... Were you in another Branch of the Service holding that 0-4 Pay Grade at the time?... Regardless, the only live fire engagement our Military was involved in is the one I sourced for you ---- The First Gulf of Sidra Incident with the 2 Libyan Fighter Jets who were shot down by our 2 F 14 Navy Tomcats... 

              The only other mention of any US Military operation in 1981 is as follows: El Salvador: After a guerrilla offensive against the government of El Salvador, additional U.S. military advisers were sent to El Salvador, bringing the total to approximately 55, to assist in training government forces in counterinsurgency.=12.5px  This was a Personnell / Logistics Operation --- not a Live Fire engagement... 

Uh oh. Are you busting out a prevarication?
 

Kobia2 » 23 Oct 2023, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 6:02 pm

              I'm just going by what you yourself claimed.... 
   You said you had served 25 years in the US Navy..... JUst trying to make sure I am not misunderstanding you here buddy...

             You said you held the Rank of 0-4 at the time of a Live Fire engagement in 1981..... Were you in another Branch of the Service holding that 0-4 Pay Grade at the time?... Regardless, the only live fire engagement our Military was involved in is the one I sourced for you ---- The First Gulf of Sidra Incident with the 2 Libyan Fighter Jets who were shot down by our 2 F 14 Navy Tomcats... 

              The only other mention of any US Military operation in 1981 is as follows: El Salvador: After a guerrilla offensive against the government of El Salvador, additional U.S. military advisers were sent to El Salvador, bringing the total to approximately 55, to assist in training government forces in counterinsurgency.=12.5px  This was a Personnell / Logistics Operation --- not a Live Fire engagement... 

Are you aware that the US Military has military personnel who serve tours of duty with the United Nations?  Y/N?

maineman » 23 Oct 2023, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 6:02 pm

She conceded.  She did not contest the results of the election in any court in any state. She did not call up democratic secretaries of state asking them to "find" the extra votes she needed to win their state.  She did not speak before a giant crowd on the ellipse and send them to the Capitol to fight like hell.  And more importantly, she didn't run again after she got beat.

She and others claimed Russia manipulated the election. Her operatives attempted to remove a duly elected president of the United States. They started a resistance campaign inside the federal government and doj. It was a coup attempt. Several of them. All failed.

Removing him from the ballot just might succeed and stand as proof of election manipulation. Trump is a figurehead. Democrats are going to turn him into a martyr if they succeed. 
 

Nostradamus'omh » 23 Oct 2023, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 5:02 pm

see you are unable to cope with the order I arranges the vocabulary.

PREACH, brutha!

maineman » 23 Oct 2023, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 6:04 pm

a day late and a dollar short.

No, no. I was there Jan 6. Right on time. Listened to Trump's speech. Then went and had a nice dinner, then back to the hotel. I had plenty of cash to take care of my own needs. I'm not a leftist.

Neo » 23 Oct 2023, 6:07 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 6:07 pm

She and others claimed Russia manipulated the election. Her operatives attempted to remove a duly elected president of the United States. They started a resistance campaign inside the federal government and doj. It was a coup attempt. Several of them. All failed.

Removing him from the ballot just might succeed and stand as proof of election manipulation. Trump is a figurehead. Democrats are going to turn him into a martyr if they succeed.

cool story.  

She conceded.  
FACT.  He didn't.  FACT.

Cannonpointer » 23 Oct 2023, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 6:10 pm

No, no. I was there Jan 6. Right on time. Listened to Trump's speech. Then went and had a nice dinner, then back to the hotel. I had plenty of cash to take care of my own needs. I'm not a leftist.

wise

maineman » 23 Oct 2023, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 6:11 pm

wise

Also right on time and flush with cash - NOT a day late and NOT a dollar short. 

I wanted to be counted among those willing to speak the truth to power. In my belief, then and now, the election was stolen and a dementia patient was installed to humiliate and finish off the republic. 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 23 Oct 2023, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Oct 2023, 6:01 pm

I have a business card - a very high quality one - that has the job title "Reasonably Corrupt Opportunist."

Not kidding. Then there is my name and under that, the motto, "Have gun, will travel." Then my phone - and that is the entire card.

Did it have a knight on it?

Ages ago

I bought a hundred of these to use as cards

it was an old fart thing back then

[img]blob:2df68152-0ff0-4872-b4a1-92913a649925[/img]
https://daytonamagic.com/wp-content/upl ... D_TUIT.jpg