Exactly. You have no proof of a flawless Election without corruption and interference.Mrkelly » 08 Nov 2023, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ So … stil no proof
just regurgitation of lies
and what makes you think that only the left have people that can’t get to the polls?
again
you only defend Americans rights when you believe in them
you presented regurgitated nonsenserighteous » 08 Nov 2023, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Exactly. You have no proof of a flawless Election without corruption and interference.
I presented the facts. You have hot-air.
Im not repeating myself for imbeciles.
There is a way for elderly to vote with assistance and is implemented in many places.
You’re either too ignorant or insist on enabling the potential for more corruption.
How American of youPhiloBeddo » 08 Nov 2023, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑ If you cannot get your *** to the voting booth, Don't vote. No excuses.
Great isolating fraud to only mail where when counted they immediate separated the envelopes to each ballot stacked the ballots where evidence was tampered with from the start at specific location the events took place. Organized deception eliminates the trace to not bet caught under local election rules changed for the 2020 forward election process.Mrkelly » 08 Nov 2023, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑ you presented regurgitated nonsense
not one stitch of proof of mail fraud
not one … quit lying
all been debunkedNostradamus'omh » 08 Nov 2023, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Great isolating fraud to only mail where when counted they immediate separated the envelopes to each ballot stacked the ballots where evidence was tampered with from the start at specific location the events took place. Organized deception eliminates the trace to not bet caught under local election rules changed for the 2020 forward election process.
Everyone remembers they shut down open counting and when all inspectors were gone they started counting suitcases of ballots stacked under stables for the counting was allegedly stopped but the numbers were changing constant from the closed counting centers.
Actions speak results, words just debate potential outcomes.
Debunking would involve an actual investigation, not the state MSM telling us what we saw we didn't actually see.
they weren't debunked, they were rationalized away by statistical analogies of probability.
proof would be niceStr8tEdge » 08 Nov 2023, 5:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Debunking would involve an actual investigation, not the state MSM telling us what we saw we didn't actually see.![]()
![]()
probability is not proofNostradamus'omh » 08 Nov 2023, 5:40 pm » wrote: ↑ they weren't debunked, they were rationalized away by statistical analogies of probability.
Neither is working theories life isn't self evident on any intellectual plane, just instinctively navigating space evolving forward now as reproductively here one of a kind.
Nostradamus'omh » 08 Nov 2023, 5:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Neither is working theories life isn't self evident on any intellectual plane, just instinctively navigating space evolving forward now as reproductively here one of a kind.
You never stop and I add a little self evident results about compounding chromosomes not available in any reality historically compared with current events reported..
Does PROOF not require an investigation?
sure it does
Go watch the video and tell me it's "speculation".Mrkelly » 08 Nov 2023, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑ sure it does
but there has to be something to investigate besides speculation
Str8tEdge » 08 Nov 2023, 5:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Does PROOF not require an investigation? :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool:
Gateway punditStr8tEdge » 08 Nov 2023, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Go watch the video and tell me it's "speculation".![]()
![]()
![]()
Some new hits:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/1 ... erference/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/1 ... er-voters/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/1 ... nsylvania/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/1 ... t-flipped/
left defines remaining total sum existing, right?Mrkelly » 08 Nov 2023, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Gateway pundit :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right[2] fake news website.[1] The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.[34]The Gateway PunditType of site Available inEnglishOwnerJim HoftCreated byJim Hoft[3]EditorJim HoftRegistrationOptional, required to commentLaunchedOctober 23, 2004; 19 years agoFounded by Jim Hoft in 2004, The Gateway Pundit expanded from a one-person enterprise into a multi-employee operation that is supported primarily by advertising revenue.[35][36] During the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, the site received over a million unique visitors per day.[37] In September 2021, Google demonetized the site for publishing misinformation.[38][39][40]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gateway_Pundit